1203
Newly Enlightened
Re: New Stanley H.I.D. and 1365 lumen spotlights
Thanks for the heads up.
Thanks for the heads up.
Has anyone seen sources for these Stanley HID's in Australia,
Definitely will be my next purchase if I can get one,
Comparing it to the N30, I don't think the price increase is unreasonable. Don't underestimate the cost difference between Li-ion and NiMH batteries, to start with.Wow nice... For the price this is definetly better deal than many other famous brand HID lights out there.
Again, dedicated flashlights makers dissapoints me.
We wait for a hid light for months (for example the L35), the makers tell us that they are improving reflector, electronics, battery, etc. They release the light at $300+, and can only be bought at special sites / stores.
In comparison between the L35 and this, compare runtime, weight, and size -- the L35 is really a cut above the Stanley. If these things aren't worth the difference to you, by all means, don't buy it just because it's "better", but don't take it for granted and assume that these improvements in the L35 don't make it a lot more costly to build than the Stanley.This is not meant to offend Amondotech or any other hid light making company, but it really pisses me off when i see them charging us 2 or 3 times more for a product that doesn't perform much better.
I wouldn't bet on finding a Li-ion battery that cheap. Remember, retail typically doubles the price from the manufacturer, so you've got probably less than $30 for the battery upgrade, and you've got to add charging and protection circuits.If I made flashlights I would take this design and put a lithium battery into it, lower low mode, brighter led module, 4300k temp bulb, battery meter, and details such as centered bulb, durable lenses, waterprofnes and rate it at 3500 lumens. Then I'll price this at $150.
Also, it's worth remembering that most flashlight makers can't push the volume Stanley+Walmart will, so they have lower production runs -- this means higher costs, which means higher prices, which means they can't push that volume, which means...
After almost an hour I finally have this thing aligned. I found some rc truck transmission spacers that worked perfect. I used 4 of them. not sure of the thickness of them though. Broke the bulb clip, so I used some motocross grip wire to keep the bulb nice n snug....gonna go outside n see how much different it is.......NorCal, best way is to unclip the bulb, hold the reflector in your left hand and with your right hand, slowly move the bulb out of the bore while pointing at a wall about 20' away. Be sure to keep the bulb aligned in the X & Y axis as you plul it out or it's very difficult to focus. You have a couple minutes before it get too hot to hold.
But then a company that specializes in tools, NOT in flashlights, releases a light that perform just as good or a little bit worse than the L35, at a super low price of $75. The L35 might have better runtime or design, but for the price you could get 4 of this stanley. Same case with the Dorcy 220lumens thrower and the tiablo A10.
Richard, overall output and run-time are often the most hotly debated topics among enthusiasts. If you significantly increase one or the other, or perhaps even both at once it's considered to be a big deal. Auto manufacturers are constantly balancing performance vs. fuel mileage where a 10% difference can make or break the model's success or failure. This is the case with almost every other device used in the world, where power runs head to head with efficiency. It's my suggestion that you may be greatly devaluing one of these the two key performance indicators with regards to run-time. If we estimate both the Stanley and L35 to be about the same overall output then we must recognize the significance of 300% more run-time with the L35. Ammondotech could have just added a SLA battery that's 3 times the size but they didn't. The 3152 or early POB already existed and consumers wanted smaller, lighter HID's. Instead they chose to go for one of very first ever li-po designs which would provide incredible run-time, while lightening the package substantially from NiMH, never mind SLA's. The example of the Dorcy 220 vs. Tiablo is similar because the two lights are worlds apart yet you suggest that price is the only difference. The Tiablo uses a variety of high capacity li-ion and or primary cells vs. a fixed 700mAh NiMH. The Tiablo is constructed of 7075 aluminum vs. 6061. It's finish is typeIII vs. typeII anodizing. It's waterproof to 15' vs. who knows. Not to mention the other possible differences such as the quality of machining, heat sinking, circuitry, soldering connections and electrical contact points.
Many would disagree. This is the other age old debate where all the other qualities and characteristics beyond lumen output and run-time are weighed. Everyone has an opinion of what these other features are worth so even in areas where there might be measurable differences the value of those differences are considered subjective. Your idea of "getting the job done" might be chasing off mating cats in the backyard while another person's idea of "getting the job done" is finding their way out of a cold, dark, wet cave or perhaps rescuing passengers from a car that's hanging precariously near a cliff. If you took your point of view that size, weight and efficiency isn't important then applied it to other fields of technology we'd live in a pretty funny world of grandfather clocks and cars that still average 7 mph. It's an interesting test to look at Surefire, what with all these $20 lights available from China. If lumen output where the only important measure for the consumer then Surefire would be in big trouble. They survive and increase for the same reason why some people would rather have one McGizmo than 20 $20 Dorcy's.richardcpf
When it comes to spotlight it is all about brightness. IMO it doesn't matter if the thing is 1'' longer or weights 1 more pound, what matter is that it does the job and for the money it has a great value.
I think this backs my point that more or better features don't come for free or in your scenario, next to nothing. The L35 uses an fantastic lithium-polymer battery with all the proper circuitry and balancing unique to li-po chemistry, has and LED module, has a 4300K bulb, has battery meter, has a centered bulb, a durable lens, is water spray resistant, is 3200 lumens, (3500 isn't possible without overdriving) and look where it's priced. $319 is still a bargain in my opinion! You're simply not going to be able to take an $80 light and upgrade it to these specs for $70 more. Even if all those things could be changed for $120 the time and developmental costs haven't even been taken into account and they're a huge investment.richardcpf
If I made flashlights I would take this design and put a lithium battery into it, lower low mode, brighter led module, 4300k temp bulb, battery meter, and details such as centered bulb, durable lenses, waterprofnes and rate it at 3500 lumens. Then I'll price this at $150.