Re: New Leadlight APC deconstrucetd - beware of new luckyduck, bigha and jasper laser
The area of the MCA is directly related to power capability. Period. The conversion efficiency losses from the IR energy through the MCA has to go somewhere, this energy is dissipated as heat in the MCA and the less area, the higher the energy density in the MCA crystals.
This is simple physics and no amount of clever marketing talk can repeal the laws of thermodynamics.
The surface area difference between a 1.7mm² and 1.2mm² MCA is more than it might appear - a 1.2mm² part is only 50% of the area of a 1.7mm² part. Again, simple mathematics.
Higher MCA temperature will lead to lowered efficiency at higher output powers and reduced lifetime of the laser - no matter what the output power is.
And - what IS the spot size of the IR energy on the MCA aperture? This is before any collimation... I'm not saying this is the case without inspection of the assembly, but it is POSSIBLE that not all of the IR energy even passes through the MCA. For the same reason, the alignment of a smaller MCA is more critical.
Who remembers the "old days" of CB radio when all a guy needed was a pot tweaker to bump the output power of his radio up by a few hundred percent? The FCC came down hard on the manufacturers - and the design community solution to that was detuning, cheaper parts, adding negative feedback (ALC)...etc. The option? Be put out of business and/or heavily fined for selling non-type compliant product.
Sound familiar?
If I might be blunt, my suspicion is that the "real reason" behind the design changes is to lower cost AND to approach a condition that consistently meets the FDA/CDRH regulations for this laser class, both being goals of this industry, due to internal business forces and external pressure from customs agents etc.
It's nice to see the APC circuit redesigned to prevent current runaway though.