I see your point, thanks for pointing it out.paulr said:In both of those graphs the L1p v2 runs about 2 hours to 50% on an alkaline cell. In the FR graph you linked to, the v2.5 hits 50% after 1 hour 7 minutes. So the v2 has almost double the alkaline runtime as the v2.5. That's a pretty significant difference by my standards. I will say the long decreasing tail (below 50% but before sharp cutoff) lasts about equally long.
LowBat said:I see your point, thanks for pointing it out.
With either version I'm much happier with the performance as compared to the Inova X1. I liked the X1 with it's sleek design and HAIII finish but didn't care for the lack of spill.
geepondy said:Why are not the L2 runtimes significantly longer, if at all really, then the L1's? From what I read the beams between the two are pretty much equal?
geepondy said:Why are not the L2 runtimes significantly longer, if at all really, then the L1's?
lamperich said:@ cratz2?
---
and the cell from the L1 reads .97V
--
under load?
Happy New Year
cratz2 said:Nope... just after 4 hours on very near continual use (less than a minute of 'off time') if I pull the NiMH and measure it on the DMM, it shows .97V.