Xygen
Enlightened
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2005
- Messages
- 310
Last edited:
I'm using a Sony DSC-F828. It's small CCD-Sensor is great for macro-shots. (2cm min. distance)Nell said:What kind of camera/lens are you using to get those details. I am looking for a new camera.
According to the description at waions sales-thread it's a Lux-I. But its brighter than my Q3 which should have a Lux-III.CroMAGnet said:Way Awesome pix!! :twothumbs
What is the LED. loox large like a 5w from the closeup.
Wow! That's ok I think. Fast even half around the globe. :rock:As for the download speed of your video, I'm downloading it as we speak and it started at about 150 KB/sec and it has alternated between 124 and 150 KB/sec.
Actually this is my first light with optics. I like the beam pattern way more then the "softer" beam of the Q3. It has a very bright distinctive hotspot and a relativ small darker ring around it. Not really much sidespill.So... how about a subjective review? How do you actually like it? How's the clickie? Hows the beam pattern?
I do not have 3.7V R123's. But I think it'll be just a little bit brighter, because those 3.0V rechargeable I used are measured up to 3.9V open circuit.Edit - also, have you tried measurements with a 3.7-4.2V R123 with the Morhpo and the Q3? Waion said in the original thread it is supposed to be safe with 3.7V R123s. Only reason I ask is the Q3 gets quite a bit brighter with the 3.7V vs a primary 123 cell.
Waion? Can you tell us the name of the company? I can't believe that this will be the first and last light of this company.Trashman said:Beautiful light. Who is the actual manufacturer?
Xygen said:Video anybody?
Download
17.4 MByte!
Pls gimme feedback about download-speed. I can upload a smaller one when too slow.
You mean kilobytes per second (kBps), right?nemul said:drop to 89kbps then slowly made it around 160kbps by the end of the download...