I am almost done with my own M6-R pack, so I decided to do some bench testing with a few incandecent lights:
Here is an H3, 6V, 55W bulb, clearly showing the soft-start feature on the LVR's, first at 10mS/div and then at 40mS/div. The scope's built-in RMS voltage reading for a longer sweep (100mS) was 6.36Volts.
I know these next pictures are much harder to see (underexposed!), but this is for the MN21, first at 4mS/div, 10mS/div, and then at 20mS/div. The scope's built-in RMS voltage reading for a longer sweep (100mS) was 6.02Volts.
I then tested the MN20 (the only MN20 bulb that I have with me at the moment!): first at 10mS/div and then at 100mS/div. The scope's built-in RMS voltage reading for a longer sweep (100mS) was 6.25Volts (which to me it makes sense since the loaded voltage for the pack when using the MN20 is higher given the 2.5A draw vs. the MN21's 4.8A draw).
Then came the N2, first at 10mS/div and then at 100mS/div. The scope's built-in RMS voltage reading for a longer sweep (100mS) was 6.35Volts, the peak voltage of the pack, instead of 11.3Volts as with the MN20, was higher at 11.5Volts.
and finally, the MN15. The scope's built-in RMS voltage reading for a longer sweep (100mS) was 6.33Volts, the peak voltage of the pack, instead of 11.3Volts as with the MN20, was higher at 11.5Volts.
Now that I know that these lower current bulbs will not blow up in the KT4, I can try them one by one. That is all for now, except that I have an MN15 running in my M6 right now, which should have a VERY long runtime
![]()
Will



. That is all for now, except that I have an MN15 running in my M6 right now, which should have a VERY long runtime
Reply With Quote
. Yes, they we bright, but to the side of me, and of course I try not looking much in that general direction
