So I got my A2, now I have a question......

clipse

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 17, 2003
Messages
428
First off, I love this light so far. It goes very nicely with my watch. :D

a2.jpg

My question though, is in the inconsisties in the machining. The groovs at the top of the body (closest to the head) have a ridge on two of them. Not really noticably but there just the same. Thats not the part I don't like. Here is what sparked this thread.
wtf.jpg

the line that looks like a smudge. (coincedently, you can see one of the ridges in the groove at the bottom of the pic.)

Is that line and the ridge normal? Just curious.

clipse
 

dragoman

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 23, 2006
Messages
421
Location
Maryland
huh.....never noticted, but mine has exact same line and a couple of the grooves have the same "ridges" yours does....

Pretty normal I guess, doesn't really bother me...

dragoman
 

clipse

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 17, 2003
Messages
428
I guess it doesn't really bother me. I just kinda expected more from a light that has a bigger following than some deities. :)

Still, its a completely awesome flashlight.

clipse
 

greenLED

Flashaholic
Joined
Mar 26, 2004
Messages
13,263
Location
La Tiquicia
clipse said:
I guess it doesn't really bother me. I just kinda expected more from a light that has a bigger following than some deities. :)
I respect your attention to detail - I still do that sometimes, but I've trained myself not to care that much. I stopped paying attention to the cosmetics of a light some time ago. They are, foremost, tools to be used and abused. Smudges, nicks, dings, scratches, etc. just give lights their "character" and as long as they don't interfere with their functioning, I'm cool.
 

SCblur

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
818
All of my SF lights have the smudge. Not sure what it's for, but it's always there.
 

clipse

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 17, 2003
Messages
428
greenLED said:
I respect your attention to detail - I still do that sometimes, but I've trained myself not to care that much. I stopped paying attention to the cosmetics of a light some time ago. They are, foremost, tools to be used and abused. Smudges, nicks, dings, scratches, etc. just give lights their "character" and as long as they don't interfere with their functioning, I'm cool.

I completely agree. The only thing is, I bought this new so I could put the smudges, nicks, ding, and scratches on it. :) Again though, this is not a deal breaker, just an observation. This light is still [peter griffin voice]'freakin sweet!!!'[/peter griffin voice]

clipse
 
Last edited:

SCblur

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
818
In my quest for the ultimate flashlight, I have noticed that there are a few companies out there that put more emphasis on aesthetic perfection (McLux, HDS) than SF. As GreenLED said, SF's focus is definitely on performance, and w/ their large military contracts, one can understand their mindset. They are making tools that are meant to take a beating. Their lights are top notch, no doubt about it, but they aren't going to be so obsessed about the aesthetic details as are most of us CPFers.
 

Blindasabat

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
2,204
Location
Michigan
The smudge is a machining mark. See how it follows the line of the flare out to the head? That smudge is the path of the tip of the milling tool as it moves along cutting aluminum forming the shape you see around the base of the clip holder.
My A2 has it too and I think my L2 had, and L1 have it too, I just didn't look that closely at them. I think some shades of HAIII cover it better than others.
 

cobra-ak

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
197
Got it on mine don't worry about it the A2 is above all that, you'll see the light,LOL
 

Haz

Enlightened
Joined
Apr 14, 2005
Messages
919
Location
Sydney, Australia
I have exactly the same mark in the same place on the light as yours. At first i thought it was defective as well. However, after checking a few pics on the forum on other A2, i notice it was normal to have such marks. Since I was not a loner in this, then i believe it's alright!.
 

Ritch

Enlightened
Joined
Jun 12, 2006
Messages
305
Location
Central Europe
Sleep tight tonight, those grooves are caused by production.
sleepy.gif
I checked straight evenly my A2, L1, L2. They all have exactly the same marks.

richard
 
Last edited:

Bullzeyebill

Flashaholic
Joined
Feb 21, 2003
Messages
12,164
Location
CA
greenLED, you are going to have to check my A2 for smudges, when you get it. Sent it out today.

Bill
 

JNewell

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 28, 2006
Messages
1,800
Location
Land of the Bean and the Cod
It's what Blindasabat said - the marks are from the cutters. Ideally, they would not be there, but they are admittedly only cosmetic. Re: other mfr's lights not showing these, make sure you're comparing lights with as intricate milling. Anyone should be able to get a simple round body with some checkering done without tooling marks. Lights like the A2 and U2 are a different order of work. :)
 

turbodog

Flashaholic
Joined
Jun 23, 2003
Messages
6,425
Location
central time
One of SF's designers stated that one of SF's most important qualities is the "chicks dig it" one.

I should have saved the clipping.




SCblur said:
In my quest for the ultimate flashlight, I have noticed that there are a few companies out there that put more emphasis on aesthetic perfection (McLux, HDS) than SF. As GreenLED said, SF's focus is definitely on performance, and w/ their large military contracts, one can understand their mindset. They are making tools that are meant to take a beating. Their lights are top notch, no doubt about it, but they aren't going to be so obsessed about the aesthetic details as are most of us CPFers.
 

schiesz

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 28, 2006
Messages
1,380
Location
Lees Summit, MO
SCblur said:
...I have noticed that there are a few companies out there that put more emphasis on aesthetic perfection (McLux, HDS) than SF.

I thought this statement was a bit funny because the 'company' that makes the Mclux makes statements like this:

This light is first and foremost intended as a tool to be used and although the price is significant, it is not priced due to time and effort devoted to cosmetic perfection or appearance. There are cosmetic irregularities in the finishes and some parts have tooling marks. The quality of materials, fit and function are of import but the looks are secondary.

This was actually written by bernie, but it sounds like a don quote to me. It seems to me like Don is always talking about how his lights are meant to be tools and the aesthetics are not the goal. It is actually US who have labelled the McLux products as aesthetic perfection, not the company.

schiesz
 

Galiphrey

Enlightened
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
308
Location
Georgia
Thanks for posting this, Clipse; I was wondering exactly the same thing. I thought it was a scored region inteded to be cut off but wasn't, or something. Also mine has _exactly_ the same "Ridge" in exactly the same place as in your picture. I was afraid I had done it somehow.

It would be neat to see how these are made; -think a CNC machine does a lot of it??
 

Planterz

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
1,162
Location
Tucson, AZ
I looked at my A2 and I have exactly the same markings on mine. I don't know if I'd ever have noticed myself if you hadn't brought it up.
 

Somy Nex

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 29, 2005
Messages
746
Location
Penang, Malaysia
I didn't notice any ridges (from memory) but I do remember seeing the smudge in both my black limited edition A2s. I would prefer it not to be there, but well, its not really that big a deal either i suppose =)
 
Top