Could it also be due to Energizer using a different packaging process with more reliability and ruggedness in their AAA and AA Lithium formulations? Since they were after all bringing to mass market a new Lithium battery in the most common sizes consumer buy! So that Joe Six pack has less chance of having any incidents with them they made sure it was well built and sealed? And that the upside of this extra packaging ruggedness is longer seal integrity, which was demonstrated in their extensive tests, and allowed a 15 year shelf life claim? And that since the volume of CR123A's sold are small by comparison, they will not extend this new improvement to CR123's?
Is this line of reasoning logical? Somone here has to know the exact technical rational behind Energizer being able to stamp expiry dates 15 years into the future on these batteries VS only 10 for their Cr123A's. I think this is a fascinating little mystery, and it is astonishing to find it unexplained... (I've searched and found no answers yet)