[ QUOTE ]
paulr said:
What's the deal with the twisty? Won't it be offered any more? I find the tail switch makes the light too big. I'd rather use the twisty and keep it small. A smaller diameter tube (like Surefire E1/E2) would be nice too, even if it means the head being larger than the tube.
[/ QUOTE ]
Thanks to all who answered; my small tax refund, which I filed about a week ago, is going for a Arc-LSH-P. I got a good price. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
Aside from my opinion that the Kroll switch is a POS (put it in your pocket, and it has a 100% chance of getting turned on, for a greater or lesser period of time, in any given day, considering that I have other things in my pocket.....) I too greatly prefer the smaller size of the 123 twisty.
In fact, if the 123 twisty wouldn't have worked, I wouldn't have bought an Arc-LSH-P. That's how little I think of the Kroll switch. And to be perfectly clear: it's not *just* the size, although that's a pretty big factor. Kroll switches are crap. Put one on a $120+ light, and you have a $120+ piece of crap. I can't believe they were ever made 'standard' on the Arc-LS, after all of the talk about keeping the size down, the quality as high as possible, and lets not forget that it's nice to set an Arc-LS on end to light up an area. Try that with one of those crappy $4 Kroll switches on an Arc-LS. Just my opinion, of course. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/mad.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/twak.gif