The OutdoorsPlus        
Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 195

Thread: *REVISED* NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

  1. #1

    Talking *REVISED* NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    UPDATE June 10, 2009: Revised edition EZ AA added to the review

    In my original testing of the EZ AA, I noticed reduced output and low runtime efficiency of the EZ AA Lo mode. NiteCore promptly issued a recall in early April 2009, and worked to revise the product. They have sent me a revised shipping version, which is now added to this review. I have left the background pics the same, as the light does not look appreciably different. Where appropriate, I have updated this review with the new info.


    ---------------

    Reviewer's Note: The NiteCore EZ AA was provided by NiteCore for review.

    Warning: Pic heavy!

    The EZ AA is the latest much-anticipated 1xAA offering from NiteCore. Unlike the continuously-variable NiteCore models, this light is a simple two-stage twist interface similar to a number of keychain lights (e.g JetBeam Jet-μ, Aeon, etc.). In fact, the EZ AA appears to be designed to compete with 1xAAA keychain lights, given its remarkably small size for a 1xAA light.





    Packaging is similar to the D10/EX10 series NiteCore lights, and comes with a one-page instruction sheet, warranty card, wrist lanyard, extra o-rings, and new "lock-style" keychain clip. No holster or body tube clip is included (or available, AFAIK).

    UPDATE:
    The instruction sheet has been updated with new output and runtime specs, and now explicitly supports Li-ion (i.e. 14500). Here is a summary of the changes.

    Original EZ AA Instructions:
    • Battery illustrated as "1.5V AA" only
    • Warning included: "do not use batteries that exceed 2 volts, as they may permanently damage the flashlight."
    • Hi mode listed as "130 lumens for 1.5 hrs"
    • Lo mode listed "15 lumens for up to 20 hours"

    Revised EZ AA Instructions:
    • Battery illustrated as simply "AA" with voltage restriction
    • Previous warning against >2V replaced with: "DO NOT use rechargeable Li-ion batteries without safety circuit." (suggesting that protected 14500 IS supported).
    • Hi mode is now listed as "130 lumens for up to 50 minutes" (which seems more consistent with my runtime results)
    • Lo mode is now listed as "10 lumens for up to 20 hours" (which seems more consistent with my output readings and runtimes)
    It is good to see the manual has been brought in line with actual performance.

    Since I know size is the prime concern for a keychain light, I thought I would show you how it compares to a couple of 1xAAA and 1xAA lights.



    EZ AA: 85.0mm x 16.6mm, 20.9g (no battery)

    The EZ AA is certainly among the smallest 1xAA lights I've seen (although the award for that goes to the Zebralight H50 headlamp). Build design is somewhat similar to my 1xAAA JetBeam Jet-μ, but on a larger scale to accommodate the 1xAA cell.

    Note that the 85.0mm height is with a battery installed but not activated. In comparison, fully engaged at max output would be ~83mm, but I doubt you'd be carrying it that way on your keychain.





    Overall and fit and finish are excellent on my sample. Emitter is well focused in the reflector and gives a nice beam (scroll down for beam shots).

    So what's under the hood?





    As you can see, the head of the EZ AA has a brass pill, instead of the typical aluminum. This is presumably for heat-sinking purposes - although aluminum has better thermal conductivity than brass, brass is considerably denser than aluminum. Normally it wouldn't be an issue, but given the low overall mass of the light, my guess is that they wanted to beef up the heat-sinking ability without raising the overall size and weight (not sure if it makes much of a difference though - scroll down this thread for a discussion).

    The head contact surface includes a small spring surrounded by a foam cushion. On twisty lights that require tightening for activation, the foam is typically used to reduce battery rattle (and potentially to limit contact surfaces for multi-stage lights). The head spring is a good idea, given the lack of a spring in the tail region (note the small metal post at the base of the battery tube in the pic above). These type of lights run the risk of crushing your cells if there isn't some sort of variable-resistance spring included somewhere.

    User interface is very straight-forward: tighten the head until the light comes on (Lo mode). Keep tightening until full contact is made and the light switches to Hi. In my testing, it typically took about one-and-a-quarter full turns past the Lo activation point to reach Hi. To turn off, loosen the head until the light turns off.

    UPDATE: The revised EZ AA requires a shorter twist to activate Hi from Lo - a little over three-quarters of full turn now, instead of a one-and-a-quarter turn.

    Note: Do NOT keep tightening past the point Hi comes on, or you risk damaging your cells.



    The light comes with a standard quarter-inch tripod attachment point in the base. Note that in the pic above I am using a larger model "gorilla" flexible tripod than the one most places sell.

    Comparison Beamshots

    Given the interest in the output of both the Hi and Lo modes, I've done some comparison beamshots at both settings. Comparators used are the NiteCore D10 (Cree Q5) and Fenix LD10.

    All lights are on 100% on Sanyo Eneloop. Distance is about 0.5 meters from a white wall.

    Hi mode :





    Spillbeam width is slightly less than the NiteCore D10 or Fenix LD10, likely due to the narrower head/reflector. Note the relative absence of Cree rings despite the good amount of centre-beam throw. Max output is certainly in the same ballpark as the others (see Summary Table later in this review for a comparison).

    UPDATE: The Hi mode appears to be unaltered on the revised version, so I've let these original pics stand. Here is a direct comparison of the new revised EZ AA to the original:





    As you can see, my revised sample is slightly less focused for throw, but is otherwise comparable.


    Lo mode:

    UPDATE: The original EZ AA had abnormally low output, so I have replaced the beamshots here with a direct comparison of the original EZ AA to the new revised version:




    As you can see, the new EZ AA is detectably brighter on its Lo setting. Scroll down to the summary table and runtimes for more details.


    Testing Method: All my output numbers are relative for my home-made light box setup, a la Quickbeam's flashlightreviews.com method. You can directly compare all my relative output values from different reviews - i.e. an output value of "10" in one graph is the same as "10" in another. All runtimes are done under a cooling fan.

    Throw values are the square-root of lux measurements taken at 1 meter from the lens, using a light meter.

    Throw/Output Summary Chart:



    The throw of the EZAA remains about typical for a 1xAA light of this brightness. Max output on NiMH is also about a typical for a well-driven light, in the same league as the D10 or Fenix LD10.

    UPDATE: The original EZ AA had an abnormally low Lo mode, likely somewhere around 6-7 lumens based on my comparisons to other lights of known lumen estimate (a far cry from the original 15 lumen specs). This new revised EZ AA seems pretty much bang on with the revised specs of 10 lumens. The new EZ AA now also supports 14500 Li-ion, as shown below:



    Definitely a bit brighter on Li-ion than standard batteries, so I don't recommend you run it on Hi for extended periods without cooling. Note also that it was rather difficult to activate Hi on protected 14500 on my sample without using a LOT of twisting force.

    Here are some additional beamshots comparing Hi and Lo on 14500 vs Eneloop:









    Output/Runtime Comparison



    UPDATE: I have only done Eneloop runs so far, but as you can see above (dotted lines) performance on Hi is not that different from before - although regulation seems to be enhanced. Output and runtime on Lo is considerably enhanced - scroll down for a better illustration. I will continue to update these graphs as the rest of the battery types are tested. Note again that 14500 is now supported on the new EZ AA.






    Output/runtime efficiency is certainly acceptable on Hi (actually looks a lot like the Eagletac P10A). But good performance here is not that surprising - there is not really a lot of difference between various 1xAA models when driven maximally.





    UPDATE: The performance on Lo on alkaline has drastically improved on this revised version. Note the full regulation pattern now, and the more than double output/runtime efficiency. Also notice the particular good Lo runtime on 14500.

    Potential Issues

    Although impressively small for a 1xAA light, I am not sure if everyone would find it feasible on a keychain (it might be most suitable for those who carry their keys in a purse or in baggy pant pockets). For short periods of time, I have tried carrying it in my jeans front pocket on my keychain instead of my 1xAAA Jet-µ, and honestly I haven't noticed the difference (but I also have a fair number of keys on there, so my keychain is bulky to start). This is likely to be highly subjective and variable among users, so YMMV.

    Tighten-to-activate twisty lights always have the potential to be battery crushers, so care needs to be used not to over-tighten. Inclusion of the head spring is a good idea, but common sense should still prevail.

    Preliminary Observations

    The EZ AA certainly lives up to its name - it's an easy to use light. Basically, you could treat it as a single-stage low light, like the Fenix E01 - simply twist to activate. But you also have the option to fully tighten to jump to the max possible output you could reasonably expect on a 1xAA light (on standard batteries).

    What is really different about this light is its slim lined design - they have kept it as thin as possible to allow you to potentially run it on a keychain. The limited storage capacity of a 1xAAA battery (which is the usual dominion of keychain lights) can be frustrating, so I can see the appeal of this design. But I'm not sure yet it if it will be comfortable enough for EDC keychain pocket carry over the long-term - in short testing so far, I honestly haven't noticed the difference compared to my Jet-µ I will report back on my extended experience with it once all the runtime testing is complete.

    Consistent with NiteCore offerings, the light appears to be of high quality, with careful attention to detail in the design (e,g. small spring on the head, brass heatsink, etc.). Despite the small size, the reflector does a very good job in balancing decent throw with a very smooth beam (especially for a Cree). And despite the thin battery tube walls, the light still feels solid to me. I would think many would find this an attractive package even if they weren't looking for the thinnest possible 1xAA.

    As with all lights, it comes down to what your intended use is. Even if keychain carry isn't a priority for you, you might prefer the KISS interface and slim-lined design of the EZ AA. But if you are looking for a good all-around general purpose light, I think you would want to carefully consider the NiteCore D10. For a little more money, you get a slightly larger light with much greater versatility (i.e. lower Lo, continuously variable interface, choice of twisty or piston-clicky action, etc.).

    For a simple two-stage light intended for EDC use, I personally like the choice of output levels on the EZ AA. The Lo mode is lower than I expected, and the option for max power is appreciated. I think these are sensible output choices for the intended usage, but given the lower body mass I don't recommend you run it on Hi for extended periods of time without some form of cooling (i.e at least hand-hold it).

    UPDATE: The revised EZ AA has considerably improved output/runtime efficiency on Lo - more than double that of the original EZ AA overall. And the performance on 14500 is very impressive.

    Lo output is now a believable 10 lumens on standard batteries. Some may still find this too low for a two-stage light, but I rather like it for keychain carry. For those that want more, Lo output on 14500 is measurably higher for most the time (i.e. 15+ lumens).

    The reduced amount of twisting necessary to access Hi from Lo is useful on the new EZ AA. Also, 14500 Li-ion support is a nice addition, as it gives users more options (although again, I wouldn't recommend running it for extended periods on Hi).

    All in all, a good upgrade from the original version.
    Last edited by selfbuilt; 06-13-2009 at 01:41 PM. Reason: Updates: Revised edition reviewed
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  2. #2
    Flashaholic* csshih's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    3,921

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    ouch.. that was fast.. great review!

  3. #3

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    I wonder what the runtime would be in a very cold enviroment, or just with some sort of cooling method.

  4. #4

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Another great review Selfbuilt! I figured it would be too large for keychain carry, and your comments comfirmed it for me.
    I wish they would make a AAA version of this light, and make it with a spring in the tail (like Fenix E01), so that it won't be a cell crusher. A super small two stage single AAA cree light would be killer!

  5. #5
    Flashaholic* qip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    u.s
    Posts
    1,503

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    very nice ...i guess heat factored in to why L91 couldnt give the usual high FLAT regulation

  6. #6
    Flashaholic* Zeruel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SIN
    Posts
    3,285

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Thanks for the review
    Noob question, is it regulated? Not sure if I read the graphs right, light output starts dips constantly....

    Hmm...low seems bright, but that's cool by me.

  7. #7
    Flashaholic* applevision's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    1,060

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Outstanding review.

    Thanks so much!!
    Galadriel: I give you the light of Eärendil, our most beloved star. May it be a light for you in dark places, when all other lights go out.

  8. #8

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Nice..

  9. #9
    *Flashaholic* Burgess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,864

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Thank you, SelfBuilt !








    Does it get hot on High, when holding it ?

    _

  10. #10

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Quote Originally Posted by selfbuilt View Post
    P.S.: My light came directly from NiteCore, so I have no idea what the bonus rechargeable option 4sevens is providing with his lights.


    Great review, though.


    adirondackdestroyer, why do you say it's a cell crusher now? There is a spring in the head already (presumably the hi mode contact), so unless you keep cranking after that spring makes contact, there's no crushing.

    A (stiff) tailspring could let you crank farther, but it adds that much extra length, too.

  11. #11

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    So the EZAA had better throw than the D10?
    That doesnt make the most sense given its smaller size. Maybe it gets higher throw because it lacks flood?

    Also does the body look too thin? Meaning do you think it would be very durable? I guess i doubt you could really crush it with your hands but if the body were too thin then it could bend and mess up the threading making it not work or be less water resistant...

    I carry a lumapower incendio on my keychain and its not too bad so personally I think that the EZAA would not even be an issue. I was thinking about getting a connexion or a nitecore d10 to replace it because of the common battery size and the keychain hole.

  12. #12
    Flashaholic* coloradogps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,261

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Great review!


  13. #13

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Another well deserved review.

    I am concerned with the foam cushion. Seems like this will be a weak link in the reliability of the light in general. I am assuming that this foam is silicone based. And if so, degradation by heat and moisture is likely down the road; not to mention, thermal and compression set.

    Any idea what is the material of this foam?

  14. #14

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Quote Originally Posted by Abyssos View Post
    Another well deserved review.

    I am concerned with the foam cushion. Seems like this will be a weak link in the reliability of the light in general. I am assuming that this foam is silicone based. And if so, degradation by heat and moisture is likely down the road; not to mention, thermal and compression set.

    Any idea what is the material of this foam?
    The light should work without the foam. The downside is that the battery will rattle and you lose some shock protection if the light is dropped.

  15. #15

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Thanks again for this excellent review, I can't wait mine.
    Welcome to take a look at my beamshots at 5m ,10m distance and lux readings

  16. #16
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    11,257

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Quote Originally Posted by Abyssos View Post
    Another well deserved review.

    I am concerned with the foam cushion. Seems like this will be a weak link in the reliability of the light in general. I am assuming that this foam is silicone based. And if so, degradation by heat and moisture is likely down the road; not to mention, thermal and compression set.

    Any idea what is the material of this foam?
    Arc AAA has been using foam for years, no problems with foam. Also, Endeavors lights,no problem their either. You hear that foam is a problem?

    Bill

  17. #17
    Flashaholic* AFAustin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    outside of Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,799

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    selfbuilt, thanks for enlightening us once again, and your extremely rapid response time is much appreciated! With so much speculation and so little information on the EZ, it was good of you to get this to print so quickly.

    The EZ looks like a very nice offering, and I jumped in on the pre-order based on the remarkably small size (for an AA light) more than anything. After reading your review, I guess I was initially a bit disappointed with only about 45 minutes flat runtime on an eneloop on high, when the promos kept touting 1.5 hrs. With the EZ posing with an eneloop in some of the photos, I associated the two things. In fairness, now that I read a bit more carefully, the specs do say "up to 1.5 hrs." and they don't specify the cell. But, even though an e2 squeezes out 1.5 hrs. before dropping below 50%, as qip points out, the e2 fails to produce its usual flat runtime....?

    OTOH, the output on high and the attractive beam are not a bit disappointing! And I'm still mightily impressed with the small size, based on the comparison photos. I'm really looking forward to knowing how it feels in the hand.

    Like Abyssos, I'm also wondering about the foam cushion long term. I've had a few lights in the past that used them, and I can remember some problems---like their falling off after the glue quickly gave out.

    But, those are small nits to pick, and overall I am impressed with what I've seen, reinforced by your always spot on comments.

    Thanks again for your excellent work!
    Last edited by AFAustin; 04-06-2009 at 11:22 PM.
    You can say any foolish thing to a dog, and the dog will give you this look that says, "My God, you're right! I never would've thought of that!" (Dave Barry)

  18. #18
    Flashaholic* Penguin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Diamond Bar, California
    Posts
    688

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Thanks SeflBuilt! I look forward to seeing mine in the mail!
    Fiat Lux

  19. #19

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Thank you for your review now waiting for mine to come come to think of it, maybe this light should have come in 3 stages, a middle at 25-40lumens would be great!

  20. #20
    *Flashaholic* kaichu dento's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    大和/Alyeska
    Posts
    5,440

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Quote Originally Posted by ruriimasu View Post
    Thank you for your review now waiting for mine to come come to think of it, maybe this light should have come in 3 stages, a middle at 25-40lumens would be great!
    Can't wait for the EZ AA II
    Marduke - Solitaire...I've seen matches which are brighter AND have a longer runtime. 光陰矢の如し

  21. #21
    Super Moderator
    DM51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Borg cube #51
    Posts
    13,339

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Excellent review! This is sure to appeal to those who want something as small as possible, but with better performance than is obtainable with an AAA cell. It looks a very neat little light, and is bound to generate a lot of interest.

    Moving to the Reviews section.
    Resistance is futile...

  22. #22
    Flashaholic* EngrPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    3,679

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    This is the review I was looking forward to. All positives as far as I'm concerned.

    Because of density, brass could be a better heat sink than aluminum for the first seconds only. Once both metals get to the same temperature, thermal conductivity is the only variable.

    The job of the heat sink is to keep the emitter cool. The emitter will be hotter using brass when the light is on for a length of time.

    If you turn both lights off, the aluminum will get cooler more quickly while the brass stays warm.

    So there is only one circumstance when brass might be better, when the flashlight is stone cold and for a few seconds.

    I'm not going to make additional posts on the subject to avoid taking the thread OT. Anyone who is familiar with thermal analysis will understand... it's pretty basic.

    Brass is like a gallon jug attached to a drinking straw. Aluminum is like a quart jar attached to a garden hose. Start filling them with water at the same rate, and see which one overflows.

    The reason brass is better in the EZAA? First, I doubt the emitter won't run hot enough that the emitter goes into an unsafe temperature, regardless which metal is used. Second, brass makes for smoother, more durable threads. Third, brass won't oxidize as fast, providing better electrical contact. Finally, exposed brass looks way cooler.
    Last edited by EngrPaul; 04-07-2009 at 04:50 AM.

  23. #23
    Flashaholic* mighty82's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    612

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    The D10 was rated 3-5 lumens, but was in reality about 0.3 lumens, so I should have known it was the same deal with this one.

    The 15 lumens seems to be about 6-7 from the measurements here. Now I hope the runtime will be at least as long as with the LD10.
    It should be, with constant current regulation and much lower output.

  24. #24

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Just a quick update - runtimes are continuing, and I plan to do a 2650mAh NiMH Hi mode run after the Lo mode eneloop is done (sometime today).

    FYI, NiteCore informs me that their runtimes are based on higher capacity NiMH, so we'll see how my results compare. The graphs will be update as new runs come in.

    Quote Originally Posted by tempman View Post
    I wonder what the runtime would be in a very cold enviroment, or just with some sort of cooling method.
    Quote Originally Posted by Burgess View Post
    Does it get hot on High, when holding it ?
    All my runtimes are done under a cooling fan. I haven't tried extended use by hand yet.

    Quote Originally Posted by Zeruel View Post
    Noob question, is it regulated? Not sure if I read the graphs right, light output starts dips constantly....
    Yes, I would definitely say it is regulated. The pattern looks a little different from some others, but it is still regulated.

    Quote Originally Posted by eyeeatingfish View Post
    So the EZAA had better throw than the D10?
    .. Also does the body look too thin? Meaning do you think it would be very durable? I carry a lumapower incendio on my keychain and its not too bad so personally I think that the EZAA would not even be an issue.
    Actually, the throw is within the range of the others - raw Lux is always bound to be a misleading variable from one sample to another (i.e. the difference from 2400 lux to 2000 lux is 20% more lux, but only 10% more throw when taking the square roots). That's within the variation you would see between samples.

    I don't find the body to be fragile - despite being thin, it still seems fairly firm. And glad to hear the size of the Incendio is good for you - keychain carry is a subjective issue, I suspect.

    Quote Originally Posted by AFAustin View Post
    I guess I was initially a bit disappointed with only about 45 minutes flat runtime on an eneloop on high, when the promos kept touting 1.5 hrs. ... But, even though an e2 squeezes out 1.5 hrs. before dropping below 50%, as qip points out, the e2 fails to produce its usual flat runtime....? ... Like Abyssos, I'm also wondering about the foam cushion long term.
    Runtimes are progressing, and we'll see how the 2650mAh does. As for the L91 runtime, I realize it may not be quite as flat as some others - but I don't see anything abnormal about it. In fact, all the runs look remarkable similar to the EagleTac P10A.

    As for the foam cushion, I understand the concern (especially unsticking - used to happen with me on the JetBeam C-LE). We'll see how this one survives the testing. It can always be replaced (Dr Sholl corn pads worked well in the C-LE, may need to be trimmed to be used here). And it may work fine without it (although I would expect some possible battery wobble with the cushion).

    Quote Originally Posted by EngrPaul View Post
    So there is only one circumstance when brass might be better, when the flashlight is stone cold and for a few seconds. ...
    I'm not going to make additional posts on the subject to avoid taking the thread OT. Anyone who is familiar with thermal analysis will understand... it's pretty basic.
    Since the light is meant to be run in the hand (with your own circulatory system serving as the ultimate heat exchanger), my guess is that they simply wanted to increase the overall density without overly increasing the weight. But I am not an engineer, so I will bow to your expertise on this one.

    Quote Originally Posted by mighty82 View Post
    The D10 was rated 3-5 lumens, but was in reality about 0.3 lumens, so I should have known it was the same deal with this one. The 15 lumens seems to be about 6-7 from the measurements here. Now I hope the runtime will be at least as long as with the LD10. .
    Yes, I was pleasantly surprised by how low both the D10 and EZ AA are, relative to their specs. I really think this apparent ~5-10 lumen low on the EZ AA is a good level for a keychain light. We'll see how the runtimes do (so far, I'm at 14 hours on the eneloop low mode run, and still going ...)

    More to come ...
    Last edited by selfbuilt; 04-07-2009 at 05:55 AM.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  25. #25

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Great review.

    I'm very disappointed about the low level, I expected 15 (anounced) lumens and this is less than half.
    Very low and very high for two levels.
    I would preferred 15 and 90 or even 20 and 80 and 1,5 or 2 hours high with an Eneloop (that's what I'm going to use on it).
    Last edited by Ble; 04-07-2009 at 06:01 AM.

  26. #26
    Flashaholic* rayman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,118

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Great review .

    Makes me want to have the light even more. But I ordered the warm-white version so I have to wait even more .

    rayman
    My Lights (current favourite: Maglite 2D modded with XM-L2 T3-7A3; current EDC: Thrunite Ti Hi modded with XP-L Hi U6-5A3)

  27. #27
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    11,257

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    As I noted in an earlier post, the foam in the EZ should be no real problem. To come to this conclusion I use years of experience with foam in two of my Arc AAA's, one of them I purchased in 2003. The foam, for one, keeps the AAA cell from moving around when the light is turn off. For another, it serves as a mechanical devise to prevent reverse polarity, if a cell is inserted backwards. Now my poor little 6 year old Arc AAA, has, not intentionally, been through three wash and dry cycles in our washing machine, and the foam has not been affected. It has been used and used and used, and the foam is ok. So, when I say that the foam will, and maybe I should say, should, not be a problem. The maker of that light did (does) supply extra foam for those that might have need for some, and one time I inadvertantly knocked the foam piece off. Was able to stick it back on, but sent for some extra foam just in case.

    My Endeavor CR2 Ion has never had a problem with the foam, and extra foam is available. So, extra foam should be made available for the EZ, and may never have to be used. Foam used in the EZ, is something that does not need to be worrried about, and should not be considered a deal breaker for those considering this light. Just my not too humble, but based on my experience with foam used in flashlights, opinion.

    Bill

  28. #28

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Quote Originally Posted by Ble View Post
    Great review.

    I'm very disappointed about the low level, I expected 15 (anounced) lumens and this is less than half.
    Very low and very high for two levels.
    I would preferred 15 and 90 or even 20 and 80 and 1,5 or 2 hours high with an Eneloop (that's what I'm going to use on it).
    Thanks for getting the quick review up. I am a bit disappointed in the first stage output being only half of what it is advertised as. I was hoping this to be the ideal pocket AA light with a nice “primary” first stage of 10-15 lumens. Most lights like the Novatac and Ra where careful in selecting the most useful setting to be near this rating. There are so many other lights that provide a low-low level for night navigation or extreme long emergency runtime. And an AAA light can already provide a decent runtime at the lower setting.

    This light only has two settings and the nice 10-15 lumen primary setting would be possible with good runtime with the AA cell.

    Not as critical to me – but - I would have preferred the high to be set to a bit lower to give a runtime of at least two hours. Set the max current to the LED to stay within its efficiency range of approximately 350mA to the LED which would be approximately 1 amp or so draw from the battery. Brightness would hardly be affected but runtime would go up considerably. 45 minutes of regulated high output from an Eneloop is not very good. But I can live with the high level of the EZAA since it would only be used very occasional.

    I think this light will be nice but I could see myself purchasing an EZAA- II if it came out with the three levels as mentioned (or with the claimed 15 lumens setting and a better more efficient use of high - that way the two stage switch would remain).
    Last edited by regulator; 04-07-2009 at 09:09 AM.

  29. #29
    Flashaholic* BabyDoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beachwood, Ohio
    Posts
    1,245

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Since there is a tripod attachment, is there any caution issued in the instructions or needed when running this light in high mode on a tripod, where you will not have the heat sinking advantage of your hand?

  30. #30
    Flashaholic* AFAustin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    outside of Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,799

    Default Re: NiteCore EZ AA Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, PICS & more!

    Quote Originally Posted by Bullzeyebill View Post
    As I noted in an earlier post, the foam in the EZ should be no real problem. To come to this conclusion I use years of experience with foam in two of my Arc AAA's, one of them I purchased in 2003. The foam, for one, keeps the AAA cell from moving around when the light is turn off. For another, it serves as a mechanical devise to prevent reverse polarity, if a cell is inserted backwards. Now my poor little 6 year old Arc AAA, has, not intentionally, been through three wash and dry cycles in our washing machine, and the foam has not been affected. It has been used and used and used, and the foam is ok. So, when I say that the foam will, and maybe I should say, should, not be a problem. The maker of that light did (does) supply extra foam for those that might have need for some, and one time I inadvertantly knocked the foam piece off. Was able to stick it back on, but sent for some extra foam just in case.

    My Endeavor CR2 Ion has never had a problem with the foam, and extra foam is available. So, extra foam should be made available for the EZ, and may never have to be used. Foam used in the EZ, is something that does not need to be worrried about, and should not be considered a deal breaker for those considering this light. Just my not too humble, but based on my experience with foam used in flashlights, opinion.

    Bill
    Yes, now that selfbuilt refreshes my tired recollection, I think it was with the C-LEs that I had my "foam problems" (sounds like a bad dental condition ). Bill, thank your your comments on the flip side of this---needless to say, I'm hoping the EZ is more like your Arcs and less like my C-LEs. And....the EZ will be presumed innocent till proven otherwise!

    selfbuilt, I meant also to ask your opinion of the "mucho twisting to change levels" issue, but I guess we'll all have a personal opinion on that soon enough.....
    Last edited by AFAustin; 04-07-2009 at 07:29 AM.
    You can say any foolish thing to a dog, and the dog will give you this look that says, "My God, you're right! I never would've thought of that!" (Dave Barry)

Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •