Grrrrrrrr

Graham

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 11, 2001
Messages
1,346
Location
Tokyo (again..)
Interesting. Given all the stuff that has gone on in previous years regarding trademarks in domain names, I don't think Arc would have any trouble getting it from them if they wanted it.

Graham
 

x-ray

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 1, 2002
Messages
1,941
Location
London
Looking on the bright side /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif at least the site will still create sales for Arc.

Better that than a direct competitor get the URL just to reduce Arcs turnover.
 

Graham

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 11, 2001
Messages
1,346
Location
Tokyo (again..)
That's why a lot of companies go to considerable trouble to register as many possible permutations and misspellings of their name.. although they aren't always successful.

Graham
 

James S

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 27, 2002
Messages
5,078
Location
on an island surrounded by reality
My favorite story of such "one letter off" scams was between 2 major phone companies. I forget which was which now, but lets say it was AT&T that was hawking 1-800-OPERATOR as their collect call service. but if you dialed 1-800-OPERATER you got MCI (or was it sprint, I don't remember the details)

/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 

shrap

Enlightened
Joined
Apr 3, 2003
Messages
276
Location
Northern California
I believe companies can use legal action to get names that include their company name, so cybersquatting domain names is slowly dying out.
 
Top