You can read the signatures on the banner posted on the space shuttle crawler.
The resolution of the digital shots is much higher. Matter of fact, decent pano stitching software allows a $200 digicam to exceed the 9" x 18" format film camera. Sorry for the rant, but I've reviewed the film based Gigapxl site on numerous occasions during film -vs- digital debates and found the images to be lacking.
The large format film shots show a glaring inferiority with film that it's remaining pundits show just how visually impaired they are. Basically, you have a choice between the longer density range of slide film and better midtone response but limited dynamic range, or muddy colors and contrast of print film but greater dynamic range. I'd rather shoot digital and not have to make compromises, nor fuss over my scanner capabilities.
Also, the Gigapxl film shots have poor shadow detail, which is to be expected with print film, but the highlights are trashed. My aging 10D doesn't blow highlights this badly in daylight in JPEG mode. Authors might want to consider investing in another scan service rather than write paragraphs of diatribe about Kodak tech films that were obsolete during the middle 80s. Probably get better image quality and resolution from current 4x5 / 8x10 Fuji slide films.