Imalent
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 109

Thread: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

  1. #1

    Cool Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Reviewer's Note: The Fenix LD10 (R4) and LD20 (R4) were provided for review by the Canadian Fenix distributor Notosora International Imports Ltd.

    Warning: pic heavy as usual!

    Specifications for LD10/20 (R4), adapted from Fenix, Notosora and other websites:
    • Cree XP-G R4 LED
    • Two modes of output, selected by turning the bezel:
    • LD10-R4 General Mode: 9 lumens (34hrs) -> 50 lumens (6hrs) -> 105 lumens (2.2hrs) -> SOS
    • LD10-R4 Turbo Mode: 132 lumens (1.5hrs) -> Strobe
    • LD20-R4 General Mode: 9 lumens (71hrs) -> 50 lumens (13hrs) -> 105 lumens (5hrs) -> SOS
    • LD20-R4 Turbo Mode: 205 lumens (2hrs) -> Strobe
    • Digitally regulated for constant brightness
    • Uses one (LD10) or two (LD20) 1.5V AA ( Alkaline, NiMH, Lithium ) battery (not included)
    • LD10-R4: 100mm (L) x 21.5mm (D)
    • LD20-R4: 150mm (L) x 21.5 mm (D)
    • Removable titanium-coated steel pocket clip
    • Made of T6 aircraft-grade aluminum
    • Type III hard-anodized finish
    • LD10-R4: 50g weight (excluding batteries)
    • LD20-R4: 56g weight (excluding batteries)
    • Water-proof to IPX8 standard
    • Toughened ultra clear glass lens with AR coating
    • Push-button tail cap switch
    • Capable of standing up securely on a flat surface to serve as a candle
    • Includes a holster, a lanyard, two spare o-rings, and a rubber switch boot
    • MSRP: LD10-R4 ~$59; LD20-R4 ~$63

    It’s been a long time since I’ve reviewed a member of the standard AA-class of Fenix lights. Here’s a chance to see how the new LD10/20 versions equipped with XP-G R4 emitters stack up to the earlier “torch-bearers” from Fenix.

    As it just so happens, I have the earlier LD10/20 Q5, as well as all iterations of the original LxD (Q5, Q2, P4 and short-lived Rebel R100) to compare to. Time for a

    Since the lights use the same head and come in effectively the same packaging, I will focus on the LD20 for most of the product shots below (the LD10 looks the same, just shorter! ). Where the difference is important, I’ll show both lights.



    The LD10/20-R4s come in the new standard Fenix packaging. Included inside the thin cardboard box with molded plastic insert is the light along with a manual, warranty card, titanium-coated clip, spare o-rings, extra black tailcap boot cover, wrist lanyard, and belt pouch with closing flap.





    From left to right: Duracell alkaline battery, Fenix LD20-R4, Fenix L2D-Q5, 4Sevens Quark AA-2, NiteCore D20, EagleTac P20A2-II.



    From left to right: Duracell alkaline battery, Fenix LD10-R4, Fenix LD10-Q5, Fenix L1D-Q5, 4Sevens Quark AA, 4Sevens Mini-AA, NiteCore D10.

    Externally, the new LD10/20-R4s appear very similar to the original LD10/20 series lights. The most significant body change is that knurling has been added the body/battery tubes, and seems slightly more aggressive than what was previously used on the tailcaps. Identification labels are clear, although not as bright as the previous versions. Fit and finish are very good on my samples, with no flaws in the matte black type-III hard anodizing.

    New with these lights is the removable Fenix stainless steel pocket clip (with black titanium coating), very similar to the TK12-R5 I reviewed previously.




    One thing that has changed is the screw threads – they are now square-cut on both the tail and head sections. While this is a nice feature in-and-of itself, it means the new versions are no longer backward-compatible with the parts from earlier generations. Up until these new lights, you could happily mix-and-match body and tailcap tubes from any previous Fenix version (i.e. LDx0-Q5 all the way down to the original LxD-P4). Now, you will need to stick with parts from this new generation.

    The tailcap threads are still anodized for tailcap lock-out, like before. Both LD10 and LD20 lights can still tailstand in their default stock forms.




    The new LD10/20 uses the new Cree XP-G emitter, with a cool-white R4 output bin (no tint bin reported). As you can see above, my samples came with a smooth reflector, but I believe OP textured is also available. Note that the reflectors are NOT user-swappable. You must buy one version or the other, so make sure you check first if it matters to you.

    And now for the white wall hunting. Since both use the same head, I’m only showing the LD20 below. All lights are on Max on 2x Sanyo Eneloop NiMH, about 0.5 meters from a white wall.

    Note: I accidentally put the wrong labels on the images below – they should all say LD20.





    Even with the Smooth reflector, the LD20-R4 has a very even beam with no obvious rings (thanks to the XP-G emitter). It also has a larger and less defined hotspot than the L1D-Q5, with reduced centre-beam throw.

    Like with many XP-G-based lights with smooth reflectors, there is some evidence of a slightly dark centre to the hotspot (i.e. a faint donut pattern). This is only noticeable at a distance – and only if you are looking for it. It is not at all distracting in this case.

    User Interface

    This hasn’t changed from earlier model LD10/20 lights. All standard Fenix lights use a similar mechanism – tighten the head for Turbo modes, loosen the head slightly for the General modes.

    For General modes, starting with the bezel slightly loosened, click on to activate Lo mode. Soft-press to advance to Med, Hi, SOS in sequence.

    With the bezel fully tightened, activation yields Turbo. Soft-press to advance to rapid Strobe.

    If you turn the light off-on within ~2 secs, you will advance to the next mode (i.e. acts as a soft-press). If you wait longer than that, you will return to the first output state (i.e. Lo or Turbo, depending on the bezel state). There is no long-term mode memory.



    Strobe frequency was measured at a very fast 14Hz.

    No PWM (Pulse-Width-Modulation)

    Consistent with other Fenix lights, I was unable to detect any signs of PWM. As the runtimes clearly indicate, lower output levels appear to be current-controlled.

    Testing Method: All my output numbers are relative for my home-made light box setup, a la Quickbeam's flashlightreviews.com method. You can directly compare all my relative output values from different reviews - i.e. an output value of "10" in one graph is the same as "10" in another. All runtimes are done under a cooling fan, except for the extended run Lo/Min modes (i.e. >12 hours) which are done without cooling.

    Throw values are the square-root of lux measurements taken at 1 meter from the lens, using a light meter.

    Throw/Output Summary Chart:






    Ok, this is where things start to get interesting.

    Turbo output of the LD10-R4 on standard batteries is remarkably high – higher than any other 1xAA light I’ve tested. On previously models, Turbo wasn’t noticeably brighter than Hi mode. At least initially, the LD10-R4 is almost as bright as the LD20-R4 on Turbo!

    Note that the LD10-R4 still lacks defined initial output levels on 14500. In other words, the light always comes on in max output direct drive, and regulation only kicks on once the light decays to the regulated output level (at which point the battery is almost exhausted anyway),

    The LD20-R4 doesn’t seem that much brighter than the earlier generations on Turbo.

    Throw is reduced on these new XP-G R4 versions compared to the earlier XR-E Q5s, when matched for the same output level.

    The Lo modes of LD10/20-R4s are higher than my first generation LD10/20-Q5s. In fact, they are closer to my earlier L1D/L2D-Q5s.

    Output/Runtime Comparison:

    To start, how do these new XP-G R4 Fenix lights compare with earlier XR-E generations?



    Now that’s interesting! For the first time in the history of the L1D/LD10 lineage, the 1xAA light is now much brighter on Turbo than it is on Hi. I’ve shown the LD10-R4 on Hi to allow you to better compare to earlier lights … but that Turbo performance is very impressive. In fact, the LD10-R4 Turbo is pretty close in initial output to the LD20-R4 (see below).



    For the LD20-R4, the difference is pretty modest. Yes, there is a small increase in output, and runtime has improved over my LD20-Q5 model. But I suspect most people would have expected to see more of a bump in output here.

    How do these new lights stack up to the competition?






















    Ok, there’s a lot of data up there.

    Simply put, the LD10-R4 blows away the competition in terms of output on standard cells (NiMH, alkaline, L91). This is a major departure for the line, and I’m impressed that Fenix managed to get the power level up there.

    The Turbo output of the LD20-R4 seems a little lack-luster in comparison – it’s not that much brighter than my earlier Q5 versions (or the 1xAA LD10-R4 for that matter). In this case, the 2xAA version of this light seems to be optimized for runtime – as expected, at all levels the LD20-R4 beats out the competition for runtime. The Hi mode alkaline run is particularly impressive.

    Potential Issues

    There is a quirk in the circuit in 2xAA form – you loose the Lo-Med modes on 2xL91 lithium batteries initially (i.e. Lo and Med are the same as Hi at first). I recall something similar used to happen on the lowest mode of the Olight T25, but in this case, both Lo and Med are affected on LD20-R4.

    I suspect this has something to do with the Fenix lights lacking a buck circuit, and the new XP-G R4 emitters having a relatively lower Vf than previous emitters. As such, any voltage above the emitter’s Vf will cause issues. Presumably, after running for some period of time, the voltage of your L91s will drop low enough to fall below the Vf of your emitter, and full multi-mode regulation through the boost circuit will be restored. But how long it will take is hard to predict – it depends on the exact Vf of your sample.

    Fortunately, this issue is restricted to 2xL91 – rest assured, all modes work as expected on 1xL91 in the LD10-R4. But of course, 1x14500 is a problem here – as with all earlier versions, the LD10 lacks all defined lower output modes (Lo-Med-Hi) on 3.7V Li-ion. The light instead runs max output direct-drive at all levels, and only enters regulation when the battery is almost exhausted.

    As with all XP-G lights with smooth reflectors, there is a slight dark-centre effect in the hotspot (i.e. a faint donut pattern to the hotspot). It is mild on my two samples, but you may want to consider the OP reflector versions, just in this case.

    The Lo mode of both my samples is higher than previous LD10/LD20-Q5 versions. Basically, the Lo mode is comparable to the earlier L1D/L2D Q5 versions. If you are looking for a true moonlight mode, you will need to look elsewhere.

    The belt pouch seems kind of cheap, compared to earlier Fenix pouches.

    General Observations

    The LD10/LD20 line is one of the most venerable in Fenix’s history – it can trace its way back to the first multi-mode Fenix lights, the L1T/L2T. I think most users will be pleased to see how it has developed with the latest XP-G R4 output editions.

    One thing that really stands out for me is the greatly increased output of the LD10-R4 on Turbo on standard batteries (i.e. alkaline, NiMH, L91). This is by far the brightest 1xAA light I’ve tested to date – initial output is in fact pretty close to the 2xAA LD20-R4.

    Put it another way, the LD10-R4 on standard batteries is as bright as most 1xCR123A lights! No doubt about it – if you want to impress someone with how bright a 1xAA light can be on standard batteries, this is one to do it with.

    In comparison to that, I’m afraid you may find the LD20-R4 to be a little lack-luster - Turbo output is only marginally brighter than previous generations. But both regulation and runtime are top-of-the-line for this class of light (2xAA). And though I generally don't recommend alkalines, the LD20-R4 is probably one of the best lights you could run them in (i.e. look at the Hi mode LD20 run).

    Basically, the LD20-R4 is the one to turn to if you want the best possible runtime on standard batteries, in a fully regulated fashion. As for the battery quirk of loosing Lo-Med initially on 2xL91, this is part of the flip-side to excellent performance (i.e. no buck circuit, which would reduce overall efficiency). In some ways, it’s similar to the continued inability of the LD10 to run multi-modes on 14500 – the circuit isn’t designed to fully support >~3V battery sources.

    Build-wise, I like the extra knurling on the body and good-quality removable clip. Otherwise, not much has changed from previous versions. One exception – the screw threads have been improved to a thicker square-cut type. This means that older style body tube/tailcaps will no longer fit with the new heads – you need to buy modern parts if you want to play “Fenix-lego.”

    The beam is pattern is quite good on my samples, especially considering that they have a smooth reflector coupled with the XP-G emitter. I believe you can also buy these with OP-reflectors installed (note you can’t swap them later!). The main difference with an OP reflector would likely be slightly reduced throw and a greater corona around the hotspot (i.e. smoother transition of spot to spill).

    At the end of the day, Fenix continues to show why it’s the efficiency-king in these classes of lights - if you are in the market for 1xAA/2xAA light, these deserve serious consideration. I just wish Fenix could come up with a true “moonlight” low output mode – it is one thing this series lacks.

    Personally, I don’t imagine there is much to compel you to upgrade your earlier Q5-equipped L2D/LD20s to this R4 version (unless you are a real runtime or knurling junky). But the much higher Turbo output of the LD10-R4 is a real eye-opener.
    Last edited by Unforgiven; 08-17-2010 at 11:27 AM. Reason: links
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  2. #2
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    3,869

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Long live the Fenix circuits! That is utterly impressive

  3. #3
    Flashaholic COAST's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Southern Orange County, California
    Posts
    278

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Another GREAT review!! Keep up the good work!!
    Quark 123^2 Turbo: Quark 123^2 Tactical S2: Quark 123 Tactical S2: Quark 123^2 NW Regular: Fenix PD30 R2: Fenix L2D Q5: Solarforce L2 w/ Nailbender SST-90 drop-in: Incendio v2: Inova X1: Robert's Custom EDC: HDS Ra Clicky 140E w/ blk SS bezel

  4. #4
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,780

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Questions: You tested the L1D rb100, but you also tested the L2D rb80? What happened to the L2D rb100? [go rebel alliance!]

    How much shorter would the 'overdrive' period of the LD20 xp-g R4 be, if you used EA91 instead of L91?

    Medium output runtime of new LD10 xp-g R4 on alkaline. High output runtime of new LD20 xp-g R4, also on alkaline.


    What would a NiZn do to the Turbo output of LD10 xp-g R4? any more light
    How about LD10 xp-g R4, with 14500 primary (split CR-V3)


    Good work.
    6.5K diving light, 5K cool-white, 4K neutral-white, 3K warm-white, 2.7K extra warm-white

  5. #5

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelW View Post
    Questions: You tested the L1D rb100, but you also tested the L2D rb80? What happened to the L2D rb100?
    Ah sorry, typo in the graph - that should have read L2D (R100). I've just fixed it.

    How much shorter would the 'overdrive' period of the LD20 xp-g R4 be, if you used EA91 instead of L91?
    Don't know for sure, since I don't have any EA91 to test. But since I believe the nominal voltage the L91 and EA91 is the same, I doubt it would make a difference. The Vf of your particular sample's emitter is likely to be the determining factor.

    Medium output runtime of new LD10 xp-g R4 on alkaline. High output runtime of new LD20 xp-g R4, also on alkaline.
    Ummm, the Hi alkaline runtimes for the LD20 and the 2xAA class are already there in the review. Sorry, don't plan to do Med alkaline runtimes ...

    What would a NiZn do to the Turbo output of LD10 xp-g R4? any more light How about LD10 xp-g R4, with 14500 primary (split CR-V3)
    Again, the LD10 with 14500 runtime is posted in the review. Don't know what you mean by CR-V3?

    And no, I don't have and NiZn batteries to test, but I expect you would have a similar issue as the L91s, due to their higher nominal voltage.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  6. #6
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    1,664

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Did you try swapping the heads of the LD10 and LD20 to see if the high output and so-so output were consistent between the two heads?

  7. #7
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,780

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Okay, another question: Shouldn't the L2D rb100 put out more light than the L2D q2, unless Fenix changed the current on turbo mode?

    No, I mean high mode, not turbo mode.
    Fenix is pretty smart, they know that some people will resolutely not give up alkaline batteries. So, in the past, they have made it so that you get pretty flat regulation on medium mode-with 1xAA alkaline, and flat regulation on high mode with 2xAA alkaline.

    I was wondering if Fenix is changing things up?

    CR-V3 has a two primary 3 volt 14500 cells (in parallel).
    Spliting one was the obtuse, expensive, alternative to using a P2D body with L1/2D head.
    Doesn't really seem worth it, if the LD10 (on turbo) is nipping at the heels of LD20 on turbo.
    I wasn't suggesting using NiZn in LD20 configuration, but only for LD10 (turbo).
    I am surprised at how, non perfectly flat, the turbo output is when using Eneloops. (because the power draw much be something )
    Granted high mode is rock solid flat.

    Thanks again selfbuilt
    6.5K diving light, 5K cool-white, 4K neutral-white, 3K warm-white, 2.7K extra warm-white

  8. #8

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Once again the LD10 R4 becomes THE reference for 1xAA flashlights.
    Another great day in flashlight history .

    I was born in the right decade...

    Thanks Selfbuilt for this great moment !

  9. #9
    Flashaholic* Dioni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Law Enforcement Front
    Posts
    1,542

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    thanks for the great review!

  10. #10

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    WOW brightest single AA light!!

    I wonder how does it compare with the Ti Quark AA R5? Mine is pretty bright with a single alkaline/nimh, almost as bright as the P3DQ5 on RCR123!

    Selfbuilt is it amazing what you do, elaborating all those charts and graph must have take some time.
    Last edited by richardcpf; 06-01-2010 at 08:08 PM.


  11. #11

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Quote Originally Posted by Stereodude View Post
    Did you try swapping the heads of the LD10 and LD20 to see if the high output and so-so output were consistent between the two heads?
    First thing I thought of.

    There's basically no difference in output (e.g. my LD10 head on the 2xAA body gave 8.1 on ceiling bounce, compared to 8.0 with the LD20 head). The LD20 head on 1xAA is also comparable to the original LD10 head in output.

    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelW View Post
    Okay, another question: Shouldn't the L2D rb100 put out more light than the L2D q2, unless Fenix changed the current on turbo mode?
    Yeah, it didn't work out that way (typically, the R100 gave better runtimes). Probably has to do with how the circuit handles the different emitters. After all, the Fenix LXD series was designed for Cree (i.e. optimized for it). The Rebel versions were short-lived - I'm guessing they didn't have a chance to really optimize for output.

    No, I mean high mode, not turbo mode.
    Fenix is pretty smart, they know that some people will resolutely not give up alkaline batteries. So, in the past, they have made it so that you get pretty flat regulation on medium mode-with 1xAA alkaline, and flat regulation on high mode with 2xAA alkaline.
    Ah, right, sorry. Yes, that might be interesting. I'll see if I can squeeze a run or two in.

    I wasn't suggesting using NiZn in LD20 configuration, but only for LD10 (turbo). I am surprised at how, non perfectly flat, the turbo output is when using Eneloops. (because the power draw much be something )
    Granted high mode is rock solid flat.
    Ah, I see ... I'm not familiar with the characteristics of NiZn cells, so I couldn't predict how well they'd work. But I too was certainly impressed to see what much runtime from the Eneloop in 1xAA Turbo.

    Quote Originally Posted by NightTime View Post
    I was born in the right decade...


    Quote Originally Posted by richardcpf View Post
    WOW brightest single AA light!!
    I wonder how does it compare with the Ti Quark AA R5?
    Good question. The LD10-R4 on Turbo is certainly driven at a much higher level than my original Quark AA R2. But I don't know what the new Quark AA R5s are like.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Great timing for the review! Mine just came today I bought this light based more on your prior reviews of older Fenix L series lights. The super turbo mode is a nice surprise bonus to have.

  13. #13
    Flashaholic* berry580's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,136

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    thank you for the great review!
    Maglite 4D Incad., Solitaire, 3D LED Jetbeam Jet-I MKII R, Jet-III PRO Ti, Jet-Ti M, TC-R3 ,TC-10 Fenix LD01 SS Surefire C2 4Sevens Quark AA Ti, Quark Mini AA, Preon 0

  14. #14

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Here's the LD20-R4 on Hi on alkalines (included on the Turbo graph):



    As you can see, that's impressive regulation and runtime on 2xAA alkaline.

    I'm currently doing a Med mode on the LD10-R4 on alkaline ... we'll see how it does there.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  15. #15
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    1,664

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    That's pretty wild. They seem to have used unobtainium in the driver circuit or something.

    Quote Originally Posted by selfbuilt View Post
    First thing I thought of.

    There's basically no difference in output (e.g. my LD10 head on the 2xAA body gave 8.1 on ceiling bounce, compared to 8.0 with the LD20 head). The LD20 head on 1xAA is also comparable to the original LD10 head in output.
    I should have known you would have been all over that idea from the start.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Quote Originally Posted by Stereodude View Post
    That's pretty wild. They seem to have used unobtainium in the driver circuit or something.
    Well, I suspect the lack of a buck circuit has something to do with it (i.e.boost only). But Fenix has always been a leader in efficiency - especially where alkalines are concerned.

    Speaking of which, the Med mode on 1xAA is now done:



    A nice bump up in output for equivalent runtime. But that 2xAA sub-Turbo performance is probably the most impressive.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  17. #17
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,780

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    If I remember when the L1D rb080 was for sale, the difference in output from high to turbo was 80 to 90 [emitter lumens]
    So, presumably the L1D rb100 should be 100 (high) and 112.5 (thereabouts)
    The L2D rb100 was 175 (emitter), so your graphs look spot on.

    Yeah, I guess Fenix didn't get a chance to optimize for the Rebel. Rebel and XR-E seem at odds. Rebel has low Vf, and small thermal contact, XR-E has high Vf, and huge thermal contact area.

    If NiZn cells were used in the LD10, the output shouldn't increase, but the runtime should. The line of reasoning being-reduced driver losses, because of higher voltage under load: 1.6 to 1.2
    6.5K diving light, 5K cool-white, 4K neutral-white, 3K warm-white, 2.7K extra warm-white

  18. #18

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelW View Post
    If I remember when the L1D rb080 was for sale, the difference in output from high to turbo was 80 to 90 [emitter lumens]
    Hmmm, it's been awhile, but I don't remember a L1D with R080 - only the L1T/L2T v2.0. IIRC, the R100 were reserved for the LxD series, with the R080 relegated to the LxT v2.0. Maybe I blinked ... these sure weren't on the market for long (especially in LxD form).

    If NiZn cells were used in the LD10, the output shouldn't increase, but the runtime should. The line of reasoning being-reduced driver losses, because of higher voltage under load: 1.6 to 1.2
    That sounds like a reasonable presumption.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  19. #19
    Flashaholic photonstorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Mississauga
    Posts
    118

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Very nice review Eric. Top notch as usual.

    The Fenix LD20 Q5 was my first decent light. I was impressed by its output and efficiency. It has a sturdy feeling to it giving the impression of durability and a quality build.
    QMiNi123-AA,AAww,CR2,Preon2,Fenix LD20,LD15,TA30TK40,iTP EOS A1,A2ss,A3Ti,UF c3,501b,502b, Glo-toob, RomiRC-b12,SFP7,SolarforceSkyline,L2,L2r,SST-90Mag4D,MiniMagAA,PetzlHL,PrincetonTecHL,TFZ1,200m w laser

  20. #20
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,780

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    I remember that 4sevens, in the sales thread-circa 2007, said Fenix wouldn't make L1D rb100, so just get L2D rb100 and L1D tube. But the L1D rb80 is still around (at eliteled, I think)
    http://www.cpfmarketplace.com/mp/sho...d.php?t=167963
    If you want to get into esoteric testing... How about low mode of LD10 on a zinc-chloride cell, medium mode of LD20 with 2 x zinc-chloride, low mode of LD20 on 2 x zinc-carbon

    You are a gentleman, and a flashlight scholar.
    Last edited by MichaelW; 06-03-2010 at 10:42 AM.
    6.5K diving light, 5K cool-white, 4K neutral-white, 3K warm-white, 2.7K extra warm-white

  21. #21

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelW View Post
    If you want to get into esoteric testing... How about low mode of LD10 on a zinc-chloride cell, medium mode of LD20 with 2 x zinc-chloride, low mode of LD20 on 2 x zinc-carbon
    LOL, that would be esoteric. Like most everyone, I try to stay away from anything worse than an alkaline cell.

    Not sure where one would buy the old zinc-carbon primary cells (aka "General Purpose") directly, since the improved zinc-chlorides came out (aka "Heavy Duty"). The latter I know you can buy at Canadian Tire or Radio Shack/The Source here in Canada, and I suppose they might carry the older primaries as well.

    FYI, I know this confuses consumers, but those batteries which come bundled with remote controls, clocks and cheapo consumer flashlights are typically not alkalines. Alkalines are zinc and manganese dioxide (Zn/MnO2), and have a higher energy density and longer shelf-life than older primary cells. But the older cells are cheaper to make, and do an ok job in low-drain devices (which is why MichaelW is suggesting I give them a try at low levels).

    Hmmm, checking my battery drawer, I see an unused pair of Panasonic "General Purpose" and UEI "Heavy Duty" that I pulled from the packaging for remote controls. I don't want to tie up my lightbox on this, but I'll see about doing a Med LD10 run, to directly compare to the alkaline. Might be fun!
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  22. #22
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,780

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    If alkaline = Ramen noodles (cheap, plentiful, good in a pinch)
    what does that make 'heavy duty'? spam

    I think that an LD10 on 'heavy duty' is going to fall out of regulation pretty quickly. The LD20 should do acceptably. CPF doesn't really need that test, unless you are REALLY bored.
    Last edited by MichaelW; 06-03-2010 at 12:02 PM.
    6.5K diving light, 5K cool-white, 4K neutral-white, 3K warm-white, 2.7K extra warm-white

  23. #23

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelW View Post
    I think that an LD10 on 'heavy duty' is going to fall out of regulation pretty quickly. The LD20 should do acceptably. CPF doesn't really need that test, unless you are REALLY bored.
    Well, I went for the LD10 Med simply because it wouldn't take as long. Here's the result:



    In a word - ugh.

    Would be worthwhile doing the comparison Lo mode run ... only problem is, based on previous performance of my LD10-Q5, I suspect the LD10-R4 will last over 24 hours on Lo on alkaline.

    Not exactly BORED here, but I have until tomorrow morning before the next wave of lights arrive for testing. May be able to get the Lo-mode 1xAA Zinc-cabon and Zinc-chloride done by then, and then try the alkaline one day next week when I'm too busy to test the new ones. We'll see ...

    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelW View Post
    what does that make 'heavy duty'? spam
    Hmmm, I would say "general purpose" is spam, and "heavy duty" is corned beef.
    Last edited by selfbuilt; 06-03-2010 at 02:23 PM.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  24. #24

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Thanks selfbuilt - another great bit of work

    I assumed the LD10 r4's extra 12 in Turbo was minimal. Sound's like
    it might be more than the small increase suggests.

    There are 2 q5's around and they are used in on/off turbo only. I and the other owner agree with you - there's really no perceptible difference between High And Turbo.

  25. #25

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Hot off the presses: Lo mode 1xAA alkaline/general purpose/heavy duty run:



    Ok, the cheapo primary cells do a little better here than on the higher-drain Med mode. But I think this make a good argument not to even consider those older primary cells in a modern flashlight ...

    And that brings to a close my LD10/LD20 runtimes. Onto other lights ...
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  26. #26

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Wow thanks for your hard work. I read that the LD10 had a rather high output on turbo but good to see proof here on CPF. Based on this review I won't upgrade my L2D-Q5 but thinking of getting a LD10 R4 to replace my Olight T15 for 1XAA in the backpack. Did you hear any hum/buzz/whatever sounds from the new R4 Fenix lights on any mode?

  27. #27
    Flashaholic* Nake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cleve. OH
    Posts
    1,768

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    I got my LD10 R4 today and fired it up with a NiZn 1.6V. My box shows 146lm, "ho chi mama" that's bright. For comparison an Eneloop shows 128lm and a 14500 175lm.

  28. #28

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    I read someplace the LD10 R4 had 170ish lumens with NiMH on Turbo but don't have one to compare.

  29. #29

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Great review... I've had the LD20 for about a month now and had to find out about the problem using L91 batteries the hard way. I wish now that I had waited on a review. Oh well.... It's still a great light if you plan to us rechargable. I'm just a little disappointed that it can't support lithium primaries.

  30. #30

    Default Re: Fenix LD10/LD20-R4 (XP-G R4) Reviews: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, COMPARISONS and more!

    Quote Originally Posted by Nake View Post
    I got my LD10 R4 today.
    Is your reflector smooth or textured?

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •