Man these LED's have a low VF! I've tested 2 LED's so far XML T6 2T and TD. Both have basically the same vF till 3A, then the 2T takes the lead. 2D had a vF of 3.250v @ 5A.
My test setup: BK Precision 1744A
Heat sink: Designed for Intel Q6600 CPU (95W)
DMM: Calibrated Fluke 179
1A - 3.000v
2A - 3.103v
3A - 3.147v
4A - 3.177v
5A - 3.218v
Cree datasheets state 3.000v @ 1A, 3.241 @ 2A, and 3.337v @ 3A.
I've encountered similar results as well in terms of low Vf. Of the 3 XM-L Mag's I've built only one of them has been semi-close to the cree data sheets.
Cree datasheet, as far as I can discern, shows approximately the following for average XM-L:
1A - 2.98V
2A - 3.18V
3A - 3.33V
At 25C
IMO, we are exposed to the most efficient XM-Ls by nature of this hobby. If we had some cheaper bins, I'd bet they'd be closer to the published numbers, if not slightly over (i.e. higher Vf).
Yes I have blown an XM-L direct driving it with an IMR 18650. It will shoot up to over 10 amps and then nothing, the led stops working. Also direct driving them with high quality cells like my Samsung 2600 mah cells will draw upwards of 5-6 amps, too high for continuous use. I have a couple direct drive lights and I have to use cheapy Trustfire cells to bring the current to around 4 amps.
These sound like a prime candidate for running on A123 batteries. I tried them on an xp-g linger special from nailbender, but ended up buying IMR's instead. On high the A123's were as bright as the IMR's on med. If these have decent output on the LiFePo4's, I may be able to narrow down my battery stock to only two types, and more specifically, two sizes.