Run Time Formula

JOshooter

Enlightened
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Messages
544
Location
Alaska
I know for some of the "designated" testers out there that testing run times of flashlights, esp. LED's, can be a long and pricy process. While mowing my front lawn I was thinking about another way to get a rough estemate of the run time of any given torch. This new way would consist of a calculator and a mathematical formula, the only problem is I don't have the formula. Do any of you fellow CPFers know of a formula that would allow for this?
 

Quickbeam

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 19, 2001
Messages
4,329
Location
FlashlightReviews.com
Here's the mathematical formula I use for non-regulated LED lights. I call it "Doug's Law of LED Flashlight Runtimes" /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

Take the stated runtime by the manufacturer and divide it by 3 or 4. This is usually how long you will want to use the light before changing the batteries... This often seems to work as a good estimate.

e.g.

12 hours = 3-4 hours
100 hours = 25-30 hours
etc.
 

Gransee

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 26, 2001
Messages
4,706
Location
Mesa, AZ. USA
How about run 4 tests per flashlight/battery combination. Test each brand of flashlight 2-3 times with 2-3 brands of common batteries. Throw out best and worst result and average the remaining results.

State run time as:

Hours until 90% brightness ("regulated run time")
Hours until 50% brightness ("Half Life")

Peter
 

Sigman

* The Arctic Moderator *
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Messages
10,124
Location
"The 49th State"
While talking to brite one about this (and his spelling - he's my son!) we were talking about the amps drawn by a specific LED or bulb, amp hours capacity of a specific battery, supply voltage, "unknown resistance" presented by the conductive path & switch...

In a nutshell, he wants to know if there is a formula using the known values of components that could render an "estimated runtime"...
 

Roy

Farewell our Curmudgeon Administrator
Joined
Apr 14, 2002
Messages
4,465
Location
Granbury, Tx USA
You would first have to pick a definition for "run-time". I started using the 50% of max brightness value for a couple of reasons.

First of all, I was used to working with "half-lives" in the nuclear business.

Secondly, the brightness of a light has to change by a factor of two for the human eye to detect the change. Also using the 50% value for both regulated and non-regulated lights tells you the same thing. It is true, that for a truely regulated light, there will probably not be a second 50% decay in brightenss.

It could be usefull to report a second run-time value that would indicate a time to really usefull, but lower level of light. Here again, a value would need to be agreed on...75%, 80%, 90% of max brightness. The 50% and 75% values for really regulated lights are almost equal!

Reporting Run-Time as time to 50% brilghtness and (say) 90% brightness would tell you if the light was regulated or not.


By the way, I became a "designated" tester after I purchased a logging DMM with a PC interface and also found out that my ISP would give me either a 5 meg web page or a 5 meg FTP site for free! Folks kept asking what the runtime was for different light, so I jumped in with both feet and started plotting runtimes for those lights in my collection. Kinda learned as I went along. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grinser2.gif
 
Top