Safe chemistry LiMN 3.7V rechargeable batteries?

bleagh

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
54
Anybody know how these LiMN (IMR) batteries perform compared to Li-ion?
I have seen runtimes of the 18650 but not any of the smaller sizes (16340, 14500, 18350).

And as most of the 14500 and RCR123 Li-ion seem to have overrated capacities, I am really interested in seeing how these LiMN batteries compare.
 

cistallus

Enlightened
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
442
As a data point, an AW IMR (LiMn) 550mAh-labeled 16340 ran 1.3 hours, and an AW ICR (LiCo) 750mAh-labeled one ran 1.2 hours, in my HDS Clicky on high. I was rather surprised that the IMR did so well. Both cells are relatively new and were at 4.14-4.15V at start of test.
 
Last edited:

rich297

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
140
Location
Washington State
As a data point, an AW IMR (LiMN) 550mAh-labeled 16340 ran 1.3 hours, and an AW ICR (LiCo) 750mAh-labeled one ran 1.2 hours, in my HDS Clicky on high. I was rather surprised that the IMR did so well.

I'm surprised too! Are the two batteries of approximately equal age and were they each fully charged before your test?
 

45/70

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 9, 2005
Messages
2,800
Location
Rural Ohio
Just to bring up a common error when referring to IMR cells, IMR cells are LiMn2O4 cells and are often referred to as "LiMn" (Li=lithium, Mn=manganese), not "LiMN". "LiMN" is usually used when referring to certain Li-Ion cells which contain both manganese (Mn) and nickel (Ni) in the positive electrode, which IMR cells do not.

LiMN, or lithium manganese nickel cells, are closely related to (but not quite the same as) the Redilast and AW 2900mAh cells (which are actually Li-NiCoAl), for example. Most of this general family of cells, which tend to also operate at a higher voltage, also contain cobalt in the positive electrode, which IMR cells do not. This fact is mostly why IMR cells are considered to be a "safer" chemistry.

Not nit picking, but rather trying to help keep things more clear when talking Li-Ion cell chemistries. The most common error I see when describing Li-Ion cells, is when running across someone refering to LiFePO4 cells as "LiPo" cells, when in fact "LiPo" refers to "Lithium Polymer" cells which are not the same chemistry as LiFePO4 cells however, they are both lithium ion, or "Li-Ion" cells.

With the newer Li-Ion chemistry cells arriving on the scene, even I get the nomenclature mixed up sometimes. Maybe I just did, but I don't think so.:)

Dave
 

ElectronGuru

Flashaholic
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
6,055
Location
Oregon
Great info Dave!

As a data point, an AW IMR (LiMN) 550mAh-labeled 16340 ran 1.3 hours, and an AW ICR (LiCo) 750mAh-labeled one ran 1.2 hours, in my HDS Clicky on high. I was rather surprised that the IMR did so well.

RCR123A's are more overstated than other LiCo's, but here's the key point. The smaller a cell, the larger the portion of a protected cell's size is taken up by the PCB's. In effect, the part of the cell that actually stores the energy gets smaller. I use IMR's exclusively in this size.
 

rich297

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
140
Location
Washington State
Great info Dave!



RCR123A's are more overstated than other LiCo's, but here's the key point. The smaller a cell, the larger the portion of a protected cell's size is taken up by the PCB's. In effect, the part of the cell that actually stores the energy gets smaller. I use IMR's exclusively in this size.

So would you say that, for this size cell or smaller, the IMR's have equal or greater storage capacity than like-sized LiCo's?
 

Colonel Sanders

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
1,022
Location
ROLL TIDE!
I just happen to have a couple of brand spankin' new protected AW RCR123s that just showed up in the mail last week....haven't even used them yet. I think I'll order a couple of AW IMR RCR123s and do a little test. I have a hobby charger than can discharge as well as charge so it should be easy to find out what the true capacity is of each. I'll let ya'll know.
 

rich297

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
140
Location
Washington State
I just happen to have a couple of brand spankin' new protected AW RCR123s that just showed up in the mail last week....haven't even used them yet. I think I'll order a couple of AW IMR RCR123s and do a little test. I have a hobby charger than can discharge as well as charge so it should be easy to find out what the true capacity is of each. I'll let ya'll know.

That would be great! I look forward to learning what your results are.
 

saeckereier

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Mar 22, 2007
Messages
138
16340 protected are 16340 + protection circuit. The Circuit doesn't take away space, it usually makes the cell bigger by 1-2mm which is why sometimes protected cells have fitting problems. There was a nice chart somewhere showing the size variations.
 

srfreddy

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 21, 2010
Messages
921
Location
New England
16340 protected are 16340 + protection circuit. The Circuit doesn't take away space, it usually makes the cell bigger by 1-2mm which is why sometimes protected cells have fitting problems. There was a nice chart somewhere showing the size variations.

Not true-AW's are the same size as Cr123's.
 

ElectronGuru

Flashaholic
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
6,055
Location
Oregon
So would you say that, for this size cell or smaller, the IMR's have equal or greater storage capacity than like-sized LiCo's?

For the 16340 size, I've seen tests and examples showing each as having more, but always just a bit more. There's enough variance between examples that I would state the conclusion more like: near enough as makes no difference.

LiCo + PCB's have enough drawbacks that they need significantly more capacity to make them worthwhile to me.
 

rich297

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
140
Location
Washington State
For the 16340 size, I've seen tests and examples showing each as having more, but always just a bit more. There's enough variance between examples that I would state the conclusion more like: near enough as makes no difference.

LiCo + PCB's have enough drawbacks that they need significantly more capacity to make them worthwhile to me.

I seem to learn something new everyday at this forum. Thanks for the info.
 

cy

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
8,186
Location
USA
Just to bring up a common error when referring to IMR cells, IMR cells are LiMn2O4 cells and are often referred to as "LiMn" (Li=lithium, Mn=manganese), not "LiMN". "LiMN" is usually used when referring to certain Li-Ion cells which contain both manganese (Mn) and nickel (Ni) in the positive electrode, which IMR cells do not.

LiMN, or lithium manganese nickel cells, are closely related to (but not quite the same as) the Redilast and AW 2900mAh cells (which are actually Li-NiCoAl), for example. Most of this general family of cells, which tend to also operate at a higher voltage, also contain cobalt in the positive electrode, which IMR cells do not. This fact is mostly why IMR cells are considered to be a "safer" chemistry.

Not nit picking, but rather trying to help keep things more clear when talking Li-Ion cell chemistries. The most common error I see when describing Li-Ion cells, is when running across someone refering to LiFePO4 cells as "LiPo" cells, when in fact "LiPo" refers to "Lithium Polymer" cells which are not the same chemistry as LiFePO4 cells however, they are both lithium ion, or "Li-Ion" cells.

With the newer Li-Ion chemistry cells arriving on the scene, even I get the nomenclature mixed up sometimes. Maybe I just did, but I don't think so.:)

Dave

how can one identify LiMn2O4 cells by voltage in end product?
 

45/70

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 9, 2005
Messages
2,800
Location
Rural Ohio
how can one identify LiMn2O4 cells by voltage in end product?

Hello cy. You brought me back from the dead! :)

Determining Li-Ion cell chemistry by voltage measurement is a bit difficult. The various LiCo as well as LiMn cells will all charge up to pretty close to whatever voltage at which they are charged (ie. the CV voltage of the charger used). LiFe cells are different in this respect, as the voltage drops significantly when the cell is removed from the charger. The rested voltage after charging at a 3.60 Volt CV is typicaly 3.35-3.45 Volts, depending on the individual cell and the amount of time the cell has rested. I've never tried this (and would not recommend it!) but I believe even if a LiFe cell were charged at a 4.20 Volt CV, the voltage would still eventually drop to within this range. Again though, LiFe cells are the exception in the Li-Ion family. All other Li-Ion chemistry cells, asuming they are in good condition, charge to very nearly the CV Voltage of the charge. Only LiFe cells drop in voltage.

The only way one mght determine LiMn cell chemistry through voltage measurement would be to observe voltage characteristics during discharge at significant current load. This would likely not work all that well either, as some of the newer LiCo formulations retain voltage well under load as well.

So, to answer your question, you can't, really. Hope this helps, LOL!

Dave
 

cy

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
8,186
Location
USA
Hello cy. You brought me back from the dead! :)

Determining Li-Ion cell chemistry by voltage measurement is a bit difficult. The various LiCo as well as LiMn cells will all charge up to pretty close to whatever voltage at which they are charged (ie. the CV voltage of the charger used). LiFe cells are different in this respect, as the voltage drops significantly when the cell is removed from the charger. The rested voltage after charging at a 3.60 Volt CV is typicaly 3.35-3.45 Volts, depending on the individual cell and the amount of time the cell has rested. I've never tried this (and would not recommend it!) but I believe even if a LiFe cell were charged at a 4.20 Volt CV, the voltage would still eventually drop to within this range. Again though, LiFe cells are the exception in the Li-Ion family. All other Li-Ion chemistry cells, asuming they are in good condition, charge to very nearly the CV Voltage of the charge. Only LiFe cells drop in voltage.

The only way one mght determine LiMn cell chemistry through voltage measurement would be to observe voltage characteristics during discharge at significant current load. This would likely not work all that well either, as some of the newer LiCo formulations retain voltage well under load as well.

So, to answer your question, you can't, really. Hope this helps, LOL!

Dave

thanks .. let's say cells are charged to 4.2v each .. typically LiCo will drop very little for a brand new cell. then progressively drop further as cells age. what's the typical drop for LiMn2O4 from 4.2v per cell?

LiFePO4 in 4x series 12v configuration when charged to 14.6v (100%) without BMS voltage will drop to 14.25v range or 3.56v from 3.65v .. a drop of about 3% or about same as LiCO

it's nice to know if you overcharge LiFePO4 to 4.2v ... cells will take that abuse without going into thermal runaway. LiFePO4 typically takes wild abuse of charging to 7.25v range to catch on fire. which is a HUGE advantage for LiFePo4.

besides tolerance to wild abuse .. LiFePO4 voltage matches nicely with 12v PB charging systems. fact is the world is already flooded with devices that mate to 12v PB or multiples of. being able to drop-in a 12v LiFePO3 battery is a HUGE advantage!
 
Last edited:

StorminMatt

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
2,263
Location
Norcal
besides tolerance to wild abuse .. LiFePO4 voltage matches nicely with 12v PB charging systems. fact is the world is already flooded with devices that mate to 12v PB or multiples of. being able to drop-in a 12v LiFePO3 battery is a HUGE advantage!

Another unique quality of LiFePO4 among Li-Ion chemistries is the fact that LiFePO4 has a voltage plateau. Most Li-Ion batteries experience a linearly decreasing voltage as state of charge decreases (similar to alkaline batteries). But on discharge, LiFePO4 behaves alot more like nickel-based batteries (ie NiMH, NiZn, NiCad) in the sense that it maintains a very constant voltage during discharge. This is certainly an advantage over lead acid, which also experiences a drop in voltage with state of charge. Voltage regulation circuitry can be greatly simplified (or even eliminated) as a result. Of course, unlike lead acid (and like NiMH), state of charge cannot be determined by a simple voltage reading.
 
Last edited:

RetroTechie

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 11, 2013
Messages
1,007
Location
Hengelo, NL
So would you say that, for this size cell or smaller, the IMR's have equal or greater storage capacity than like-sized LiCo's?
More like: @ high drain, IMR cells can put a greater % of their capacity to good use. Which makes them perform on par with higher-capacity cells. This is especially true for small sizes like 16340, since it's easier for devices to reach a point where you're talking 'high drain'.

On the flip side: once that energy has drained, it's "lights out" quickly for an IMR cell (similar to LiFePO4 cells). That is: drained at a high power level means drained, period. With regular LiCo cells, there's more room to drain a cell at low power after it ran out of steam on high.
 

BVH

Flashaholic
Joined
Sep 25, 2004
Messages
7,023
Location
CentCalCoast
Just look at this flat discharge test of my 100 Ah LiFeP04 brick cells: (I used 2 cells in Series and extrapolated to 9 cells in-Series - how I use them, because my electronic load would not handle that Amperage at the higher Voltage)

starting pack............29.76V - immediately dialed in 85 Amps and tapered down to 63 Amps over 45 seconds. Remained at 63 amps for balance of test.
At 5 minutes.............28.67
At 10 minutes...........28.58
At 20 minutes...........28.49
At 30 minutes...........28.43
At 40 minutes...........28.35
At 50 minutes...........28.24
At 60 minutes...........28.06
At 63 minutes...........28.0
At 67 minutes...........27.9V - 3.1 VPC




Another unique quality of LiFePO4 among Li-Ion chemistries is the fact that LiFePO4 has a voltage plateau. Most Li-Ion batteries experience a linearly decreasing voltage as state of charge decreases (similar to alkaline batteries). But on discharge, LiFePO4 behaves alot more like nickel-based batteries (ie NiMH, NiZn, NiCad) in the sense that it maintains a very constant voltage during discharge. This is certainly an advantage over lead acid, which also experiences a drop in voltage with state of charge. Voltage regulation circuitry can be greatly simplified (or even eliminated) as a result. Of course, unlike lead acid (and like NiMH), state of charge cannot be determined by a simple voltage reading.
 

cy

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
8,186
Location
USA
Another unique quality of LiFePO4 among Li-Ion chemistries is the fact that LiFePO4 has a voltage plateau. Most Li-Ion batteries experience a linearly decreasing voltage as state of charge decreases (similar to alkaline batteries). But on discharge, LiFePO4 behaves alot more like nickel-based batteries (ie NiMH, NiZn, NiCad) in the sense that it maintains a very constant voltage during discharge. This is certainly an advantage over lead acid, which also experiences a drop in voltage with state of charge. Voltage regulation circuitry can be greatly simplified (or even eliminated) as a result. Of course, unlike lead acid (and like NiMH), state of charge cannot be determined by a simple voltage reading.

not true .. state of charge can be determined easily by a simple voltage reading. for single cell that takes a precision volt meter which the average consumer doesn't have. but for four cell in series like for 12v Motorcycle LiFePO4 batteries. it's easy to determine state of charge with a VOM.

currently the fastest selling LiFePO4 batteries are for motorcycles. speed of adoption has taken a number of major battery mfg by surprise. due to almost flat discharge curve coupled with LiFePO4's ability to tolerate wild abuse from overcharge. Some 12v LiFePO4 mfg have elected not to use any BMS at all. others are using a very_sophisticated BMS using MOSFET to disconnect main buss under certain conditions.

current doing a long term test for Optimate Lithium LiFePO4 battery charger. which balances cells without external balance leads.

here's a state of charge chart for 12v LiFePO4


 
Top