PEAK

View Poll Results: Would you buy a TRI EDC extension tube?

Voters
54. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, at any price!

    3 5.56%
  • Yes, if the price is under $100!

    11 20.37%
  • Yes, if the price is under $70!

    10 18.52%
  • Yes, if the price is under $50!

    10 18.52%
  • No I'm not keen at all!

    20 37.04%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 37

Thread: Intererst in Body Extension for TRI EDC, SST-50 and XM-L?

  1. #1

    Default Intererst in Body Extension for TRI EDC, SST-50 and XM-L?

    Hi All,

    I am thinking of having an extension made from bare Ali for my TRI-EDC so I can use 2 x 18350 and get 1100 lumen instead of 700, or just more runtime with an 18650 and spacer.

    The extension would also work on the SST-50 and EDC XM-L, as confirmed by Mac via PM.

    Mac is not going to make them and thinks there won't be much interest, I'm more hopeful

    It will be cheaper to make a few and I know a machinist who will do it if there is enough interest.

    I would guess around $60 - $90 shipped for the finished piece, maybe less, if it's much more even I probably won't be keen.

    My TRI EDC is bare Ti but Ali is much cheaper and close enough match for me. You can get the extension cerakoted to match your light I guess too. It will be identical to the head in diameter and as close as possible in finish

    Any interest in something like that?

    I added a poll, results are private so no one can see how you voted but feel free to post here

    Please vote however you feel, especially if you are NOT interested so we can see the ratio of Yes to No.

    Thanks,

    Steve.
    Last edited by stevenkelby; 05-09-2011 at 01:56 AM.

  2. #2

    Default

    I am holding out for Mac's XM-L EDC. I don't know yet if the diameter and threading will be the same as the Tri-EDC, but if so, I'd love an extender for exactly the reasons you cite.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    Cool, not sure if an extension would work for them too, here's hoping Mac says yes!

    I wouldn't use the extension for EDC but would add it for night walks, camping etc.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenkelby View Post
    Cool, not sure if an extension would work for them too, here's hoping Mac says yes!

    I wouldn't use the extension for EDC but would add it for night walks, camping etc.
    Yes, exactly. Being able to switch easily between compact EDC with 18350 (or easily found CR123) and long-life 18650 when needed would be sweet. Some folks argue that it's better to have multiple lights (or spare batteries) to suit the task, and I see their point. But I like the Lego option anyway, because sometimes I'm just in the mood for a particular beam type or tint or UI.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    I don't even have my Tri-EDC yet (9 weeks now ) , but have expressed interest in an extension tube in the past and most certainly would have purchased one if it was an option on Mac's site. I'm in if there's a possibility for this.
    Last edited by Zen Ape; 05-05-2011 at 01:27 PM.

  6. #6
    Flashaholic* stoli67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Sydney Austalia
    Posts
    866

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    For me the biggest issue is heat... Running at full power for extended periods is tough on the hands

    I am not keen to run it hotter

    Andrew
    Currently into SPYs....
    My Lights In Detail

  7. #7

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    Quote Originally Posted by stoli67 View Post
    For me the biggest issue is heat... Running at full power for extended periods is tough on the hands

    I am not keen to run it hotter

    Andrew
    Good point for sure, you wouldn't want to run it on high for too long with a single cell, 2 cells would be even worse.

    I was thinking of the 2nd cell more for extended use on medium where it doesn't create too much heat, that's where I would like more run time.

    Or for more lumens when I do want high for brief periods

    I agree though, heat is the main downside on high for extended use.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    Great news, Mac just confirmed that an extension would work for SST-50 and the upcoming XM-L too!

    Thanks for all the votes so far guys, for and against.

  9. #9
    Enlightened
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Costa Mesa , Ca .
    Posts
    50

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    I tried my head mocked up with 2 cells and though it was daytime the increase in brightness seemed marginal .
    Heat concerns me also as my single cell tri gets plenty hot already on high , might still get one though but seems
    like money better spent on another one of mac's creations .

  10. #10

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    Quote Originally Posted by torcher View Post
    I tried my head mocked up with 2 cells and though it was daytime the increase in brightness seemed marginal .
    Heat concerns me also as my single cell tri gets plenty hot already on high , might still get one though but seems
    like money better spent on another one of mac's creations .
    Yeah. Visual difference between 800 and 1000 lumens isn't noticeable unless you have them side by side or you're outside in the dark with some distance to use. Plus with such a wide hotspot, the difference is even less pronounced.

    I would be interested in an extender body (in Ti though) for my sst50 but not for an 18650. I think an 18500 would be ideal. It would keep the light compact but give it much more runtime over the 16340 or 18350.

  11. #11
    nfetterly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati area, but lots of travel
    Posts
    2,434

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    Interested in extender in Ti. I do like a 18650 sized light - although the EDC format goes sweet in a holster.

    I have both ST-50 & Tri - but haven't had the guts to have the SST-50 bored. If I did get an extension I think it would tip me over into boring the SST-50.

    I've had very limited run time on the tri-edc due to a whole variety of issues. I think an EDC sized light would benefit more from the increased run time on an 18650 than running 50% more lumens - the SST-50 heats up fast enough as originally designed with the 2.8 A driver (which I would not trade!).


  12. #12
    Flashaholic* The Coach's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    919

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    I like mine just the way they are.

  13. #13
    Flashaholic* scout24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    NY, Penn's Woods
    Posts
    3,148

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    I'm with Coach on this one, perfect just the way they are. I bought my Tri (And previous SST-50's) because they were SMALL and BRIGHT! Great pocket sized EDC, a longer form factor would not do it for me. High on short bursts dazzles from such a small package, I find I use medium and low more, as they are a bit more practical for me. Kudos to Mac for the low level being as good as it is, a very nice indoor level at night. Not for midnight runs, but checking on laundry, dishwasher, feeding cats, etc... For a 700lm. light to have that usable low... I'm a fan!

  14. #14

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    Perfectly understandable, the lights are awesome just as they are. Thanks for the votes guys!

  15. #15
    Flashaholic
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    201

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    Nope, mine runs hot enough as it is.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    I wouldn't mind having the extension when I plan on using the light for extended periods like when I go fishing or camping. I can use the medium mode and know I've got plenty of light for the night. I do have to say that after all the time I've been trying to find the perfect light I think this is it. I love the size and beauty and power. I do think I can retire from the forum because there is no need to look for flashlights...but I do think I need to get the tri in Brass with a neutral led...hmm sure wouldn't mind checking out the xml when it comes out. Guess I'm not retiring after all.

  17. #17
    Flashaholic* paintballdad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kaliporniya
    Posts
    525

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    Not interested in an extension at all and wouldn't buy one even at $25. I've seen Mac's prototype 18650 Tri-EDC and did not like the overall look of the light, the proportion seems off. The Tri-EDC and even the SST-50 in it's current form IMHO is the perfect size for everyday carry. I always have spare cells with me and do not see any advantage to having the extension.
    Since picking up Mac's Tri-EDC & SST-50 and Henry's Clicky & Twisty,i haven't had the urge to buy any more lights. I'm actually going to thin out the collection quite a bit in the next few weeks.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    NOPE!

    I'm out of this one. The Tri is PERFECT just the way it is!

    my 2c

    Jtruck

  19. #19
    Flashaholic
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bainbridge Island, WA
    Posts
    120

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see how this would work on the older SST-50 EDC bodies that are only bored for 16340's? Interesting and simple idea, but I'm afraid I'm with most of the purists around here and consider the Tri-EDC in its stock format to be the best EDC ever made. On the rare occasion I need extra runtime, I carry a backup.

  20. #20

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    Quote Originally Posted by smack2000 View Post
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see how this would work on the older SST-50 EDC bodies that are only bored for 16340's?
    The extension would allow you to use 2 x 16340s Thanks for all the votes guys, positive and negative. I agree the light is great just as it is and don't see the extension as an improvement, just as an option I want one so will go ahead and get a dozen or so made, hopefully within a month or so. Thanks, Steve.

  21. #21

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    I'll take 2 please.

  22. #22

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extension for TRI EDC, SST-50 and XM-L?

    Were these ever made?
    Current EDC Lights: Mac Tri EDC 45K 1st Gen. Orange Cerakote, K2-MS, FB1/E1E and ReVo SS | My EDC Items

  23. #23
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    ROLL TIDE!
    Posts
    1,010

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extension for TRI EDC, SST-50 and XM-L?

    I think the 18500 idea is the best one. You would only be a bit more than a half inch longer. A small tradeoff for having 1500mah, IMO.

  24. #24

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extension for TRI EDC, SST-50 and XM-L?

    Sorry guys I had a dog die, $4500 in vet bills and no money for this project.

    I'd still like an extension but can't pay the up front costs to get someone here to do it.

    Hopefully it will happen one day.

  25. #25
    Unenlightened
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    17

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extesion for TRI EDC?

    Quote Originally Posted by badtziscool View Post
    Yeah. Visual difference between 800 and 1000 lumens isn't noticeable unless you have them side by side or you're outside in the dark with some distance to use. Plus with such a wide hotspot, the difference is even less pronounced.

    I would be interested in an extender body (in Ti though) for my sst50 but not for an 18650. I think an 18500 would be ideal. It would keep the light compact but give it much more runtime over the 16340 or 18350.
    I agree 18500 would be perfect. I want an EDC that is as small of a diameter as possible, but a little extra length is no issue at all.

  26. #26

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extension for TRI EDC, SST-50 and XM-L?

    Now that many people have tri-edcs maybe mac will think about making an extension?

    Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2

  27. #27
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    ROLL TIDE!
    Posts
    1,010

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extension for TRI EDC, SST-50 and XM-L?

    I'd buy one. Running 2 x 18350s would be awesomely bright! -----> Whadaya say, Mac? I bet you could sell 100 of these in no time.
    SPY 007 XM-L2, BVH 150w Vec192 HID, Gen III Maxabeam, Barn Burner, FireFox III, Mac's Customs 3840L & Damascus/Cu/Al Tri-EDCs, ma_sha1 FrankenMag, Drake, MF Scorpion 4x XM-L2, Tri-219 EYE10, XP-G2 X10

  28. #28
    Flashaholic* KuanR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Macau S.A.R.
    Posts
    1,225

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extension for TRI EDC, SST-50 and XM-L?

    Haha I would be interested too...but I have a damascus Tri-EDC. That tube is going to be EXPENSIVE and won't match the pattern of my light
    I'm Ryan.

  29. #29
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Fresno, CA
    Posts
    961

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extension for TRI EDC, SST-50 and XM-L?

    I thought the EDC's are using a NANJG 2.8a driver with a max voltage of 6V?
    Matt

  30. #30
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Fresno, CA
    Posts
    961

    Default Re: Intererst in Body Extension for TRI EDC, SST-50 and XM-L?

    I've seen the gut of an old SST-50 EDC tube and it doesn't look like there's room to bore the inside for an 18mm battery. Did Mac made his newer models with a larger ID and OD on the head itself?
    Matt

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •