My windows experience index score is infinity.
Using my Mac is infinitely better than using my PC!
I'll post my score once I get my new HDD installed this week...
Built a new machine for a friend the other week, got a 7.8 not too shabby Everything got a 7.9 except the SSD drive which got the 7.8.
It really is the business. Intel core i7 2600k sandybridge, 8gig fancy ram, SSD, GTX 570 GC, Corsair h50 water cooling for proc.
Hes currently playing MS flightsim X, with everything on high/ultra etc at 2560x1440, even air/land/sea traffic on high, getting 80 FPS!!!
Now i need a new machine
Who the hell decided to make it out of 7.9 instead of 10? Seriously, what the hell were they thinking?
A little madness never hurt anybody.
It's better than Vista, which tops out at 5.9!
Fenix TK-11 R5 | Olight SR90 | SWM V10R Ti XP-G R5 | JetBeam TC-R1 #167
Well, the !&#% with that. Mine shows only 5.9, and the computer is only ~1 month old. etc.
However, my personal Windows experience is ~20 years, LOL
Resistance is futile...
Those ratings have rather limited correlation with real benchmarking performance, however ....
Last edited by archimedes; 06-20-2011 at 08:03 AM.
IF 2 = 1 THEN 1 = 0
Ran this on my Dell laptop which is about 4 years old and got 1.0!
No aero, nothing fancy at all, but Win 7 still runs better than XP did.
And the OCZ Agility 3 peak (burst) data transfer speeds are a bit over 500 MB/sec (525 MB/s, according to the spec sheet), but usually below even SATA-II bandwidth for sustained R/W (with encoding and such, SATA-II transfer speeds are around 300-350 MB/s). Unless you have several SSDs in a RAID, you are unlikely to have much bottleneck at the SATA bus ....
Last edited by archimedes; 06-20-2011 at 01:53 PM.
IF 2 = 1 THEN 1 = 0
The WEI just doesn't do it for me. I've worked on too many machines where it gave a high rank and the machine was a dog or a lower rank when it ran great. The amount of RAM you have and your typical application load have a lot to do with it.
A few months ago I was troubleshooting slow disk performance in a corporate VMware cluster and I came up with a quick benchmark I could do on all windows boxes to test HD write speed, which is really what matters. Open MS paint, create a 6000x6000 blank image, and save it to a the drive of your choice as a 24-bit BMP. This is roughly a 105meg file. I was astounded to see this could vary 500-600% on new hardware running Server 2003 or Win 7, with SANs or SSD based boxes taking around 2 seconds to save. Some new workstations right out of the box are taking 9 seconds or longer to just to save, so there is obviously some serious issues with HD controllers / drivers out there.
You guys with SSDs and non SSD computers should try this to see just how lousy HD write speeds can be and how benchmarks can lie.
For the record, the latest HP thin clients I deployed running embedded Windows 2008 scored a lofty 2.8 - yippee!
I dont know how to prove it to you but when I clicked save as... and chose 24-bit BMP that is a 6000x 6000(103megs) blank page there was no lag.... instant(so fast I thought it did nothing but when I checked my desktop there it was) and was saved on my desktop.
PS... my windows boot up time is 12 seconds(not including bios...).
Last edited by daimleramg; 06-20-2011 at 09:32 PM.
What type of drive?
OCZ Agility 3 SATA III SSD
So here's mine. Humble, but not rubbish. For added fun, since WEI is such a poor measurement tool, here's my Geekbench result, and 3DMark Vantage result. 3DMark was set to default "Performance" settings.
Oh, and it's not running at 2.66Ghz... Have a look at the FSB Speed. 375Mhz's and odd speed isn't it?
Which explains the write speed :-)OCZ Agility 3 SATA III SSD
The only hardware I see producing fast results (.5-2sec range) are either SAN's, or SSD's. I'm seeing SATA desktop speeds all over the place, and this just doesn't make sense given the hardware isn't that variable. More cores and faster FSB doesn't translate into faster HD speed.
My suspicion is it's a partition alignment issue given so many Win 7 machines come preconfigured and imaged from XP based cloning tools at the factory. SDD's are typically configured by the user.
Tweaks to the partitioning can certainly improve benchmarks a bit, but an optimized controller will have a major impact.
IF 2 = 1 THEN 1 = 0
My HDD is a WD RE4 Enterprise 1TB, with 64 MB cache. It's specifically designed for high-write workloads. That and it has a 5 year warranty. I've had 4 drives fail on me in the last year, so I'm hoping a server class drive will hold up a bit longer.
I have a Dell with XP installed, and 4gig of RAM and an Intel dual core...any good tools out there to get a good rating on mine, since windows doesn't have one for XP???
Geekbench is the best universal measurement of CPU and RAM performance. 3DMark is the best for graphics performance.