Lithium IMR vs ICR vs IFR

Kingnog

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
21
Can someone please explain the difference between 14500 IMR, ICR and IFR battery types? Which would be best for a flashlight rated for 4.2v max?

I have checked out the huge battery sticky and couldn't find any of that information.
 

HKJ

Flashaholic
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
9,715
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
Maybe this table can help a bit (It is from one of my charger reviews):
supportedBatteryTypes.png


ICR are the usual type of LiIon batteries.
IMR has less capacity and can deliver higher current.
IFR is a lower voltage.
 

Kingnog

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
21
Thanks for the literature, but I'm still confused....do I want a higher current with less capacity? Do I want the "usual" type (ICR)?

Which one should I use for my 4.2v 1x14500 flashlight? I should get a protected one, right?
 

HKJ

Flashaholic
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
9,715
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
Thanks for the literature, but I'm still confused....do I want a higher current with less capacity? Do I want the "usual" type (ICR)?

Which one should I use for my 4.2v 1x14500 flashlight? I should get a protected one, right?

Most people uses ICR cells, these are the only type you can get with protection.
 

Helmut.G

Enlightened
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
731
Location
Germany
IFR have a much longer life expectation than the two other types (both in cycles and in time) from what I've read and can supply extreme power levels without problems (more than IMR). they are also less dangerous if abused.


for a low power flashlight ICR will give you max runtime, IFR maximum safety.
 

jasonck08

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 16, 2007
Messages
1,516
Location
Redding, CA
First off, this will explain their names:

In the case of IxR, the first Letter "I" just means that the cell is a Li-ion rechargeable. Second letter refers to the cathode material. The last letter "R" just means the cell is round.

ICR = Li-ion Rechargeable, the "C" = Cobalt.

IFR = the "F" stands for the element "Fe" which is Iron

IMR = the "M" stands for Manganese, or "Mn".

-----------------------------------------------------

Unless you are trying to draw a lot of current from the cell, most people use protected ICR cells to power their lights because they offer the most energy density. IMR's are more often used for higher current applications, and these cells require more care because there is no protection circuit and its easier to over discharge the cell.
 

Therrin

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
89
I had been wondering about this on another thread and never got an answer. This is pretty informative, thanks! :)

I just got some 26650's off batteryspace. They're ICR's, but I don't believe they're protected =(
 

eusty

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Dec 31, 2012
Messages
75
Location
UK
Yeah nicely put. I've read about batteries a bit but never seen the abbreviations explained :)

Sent using Tapatalk 2.
 

Joe Talmadge

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 30, 2000
Messages
2,200
Location
Silicon Valley, CA
Can someone please explain the difference between 14500 IMR, ICR and IFR battery types? Which would be best for a flashlight rated for 4.2v max?

Kingnog, "best" has to do with a number of factors -- not just what the flashlight is rated for, but other factors could include how responsible you will be in maintaining your cells, whether the light has built-in over-discharge circuitry, how much current the light draws on high. In other words, if you really want to learn more, it might help to ask this question in the context of a particular light.

I can tell you what we do know already. For a light that can handle 4.2V, we can look at HKJ's chart in the 2nd post and know that we'd go with ICR or IMR (we might as well drive the light at the max voltage supported, unless we know that the light is tuned for a different voltage, the way some zebralights seem to be tuned for NiMH instead of Li Ion). These two have some tradeoffs versus each other:

ICR has relatively more power density than IMR. That is, both are 4.2V max, but the ICR will be rated at higher mAh. That means that under many conditions -- but not all conditions, see below -- the ICR will probably last longer.

IMR can support higher discharge rates than ICR. There are some lights -- witness the 1x16340 lights that are putting out 500+ lumens -- that pull amps that are at the edge, or over the edge, of what an ICR can support, whereas an IMR won't even be breathing hard. Also, it is common that when you stress an ICR this much, voltage sags and it runs less efficiency, so that in extremely high-drain demanding applications, it sometimes happens that an IMR can last longer than an ICR, even though the ICR has a higher mAh rating.

ICR is less safe than IMR. That is, ICRs can go into thermal runaway easier, and that can mean an extremely unpleasant reaction ... in the extreme, your flashlight blowing up or house going on fire. Much more difficult to get an IMR to do that. As a result, ICR can be bought with or without a protection circuit. Depending on your state of knowledge -- right now, based on your questions, I don't think you should consider buying any Li Ion unless you learn a bit more -- you might stick with a protection circuit for now, if you go ICR. IMRs do not have protection circuits, because their chemistry is safer; you might ruin the battery if you mishandle it, but you probably won't blow it up.


My general guidelines:
- Understand proper care and handling of Li Ion
- Buy quality cells and a quality charger. If you're tempted to cheap out, don't play with Li Ions at all
- I stick with protected LiCo anywhere that works well. In a light that has circuitry that prevents overdischarge, and it can benefit from IMR's greater discharge rates, I go IMR. If the light can't handle a 4.2V ICR/IMR well, but can handle a 3.6V IFR, then I go with IFR. I don't do unprotected LiCo. Those are just my personal guidelines, there are smarter people than me with different ones.
 

HKJ

Flashaholic
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
9,715
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
purely out of curiosity, surely it wouldn't hurt to put protection on an IFR cell though, right?

No, it would be perfectly fine.
IFR is often used for high current draws, this makes the protected more expensive.
The amount of IFR cells sold for stand alone use is probably a very small fraction of the number of ICR cells, making it a much less interesting business.
 

VidPro

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Messages
5,441
Location
Lost In Space
^ i have always wondered that too. a high amp protection. I also wonder if it might be usefull in the li-fe , or if it is deemed totally unnessisary.
 

tobrien

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
4,861
Location
Georgia Highway 441
No, it would be perfectly fine.
IFR is often used for high current draws, this makes the protected more expensive.
The amount of IFR cells sold for stand alone use is probably a very small fraction of the number of ICR cells, making it a much less interesting business.

ohhhhhhh okay! your explanation was perfect, thank you :)
 

ragnarok164

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
101
Are there any difference between lMR and lCR cells for self-discharge? I think Li-ion based cells have a lower self-discharge rate than Ni-MH cells right?
 
Last edited:

reppans

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Messages
4,873
.....I think Li-ion based cells have a lover self-discharge rate than Ni-MH cells right?

Hmmmm, not if their both stored at 100% and at room temp. An Eneloop is said to self-discharge about 15% (recoverable) after a year while a Li-ion will suffer a permanent capacity loss of ~ 20% (per BattUniv.). But the Li-ion will probably do better if both are stored a 40%.
 

StorminMatt

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
2,263
Location
Norcal
No, it would be perfectly fine.
IFR is often used for high current draws, this makes the protected more expensive.
The amount of IFR cells sold for stand alone use is probably a very small fraction of the number of ICR cells, making it a much less interesting business.

Another thing to keep in mind about a hypothetical protected IFR cell is that, because an 18650 can potentially generate 30+ amps on a continuous basis, the protection circuit would inevitably have to be physically much bigger than that found on an ICR battery. This would either make the battery too big for many 18650 applications. Or it would significantly reduce the capacity of the battery by cutting into real estate formerly occupied by actual active material in the battery. And because IFR cells naturally have less capacity than ICR cells, further capacity reductions resulting from the need to make room for protection circuitry could render IFR batteries fairly useless for many applications. Of course, I merely used the example of an 18650. Other battery sizes (26650, 32650, etc) would similarly suffer if they were protected.
 

TEEJ

Flashaholic
Joined
Jan 12, 2012
Messages
7,490
Location
NJ
/\ /\ /\

Excellent point.

---------------------

I'll add that the suggestion to specify what light its for would help too, because the circuits on some lights will allow the light to be brighter with more voltage, and/or more amps, etc.

That means that the extra watt hours, etc, can either make a light run longer, or, brighter but shorter, etc.

Depending on your priorities...you may be happy with a given output of light, and just want it to run as long as possible, or, you might want to maximize the brightness and are happy with a shorter run time to get it, etc.
 

LuxLuthor

Flashaholic
Joined
Nov 5, 2005
Messages
10,653
Location
MS
Back years ago when I was actually posting useful information, I did two threads that I believe are still accurate to date. Battery capacity has increased, but the concepts remain the same. Back then we used to walk 5 miles to school, you were cool if you had a Superman Lunchbox, and none of the single Lithium Ion cells were freely available. Their use and discovery was driven largely by the RC (cars, planes, boats, etc.) crowd who knew tons more about LiPo/Li-Ion batteries than CPF members. Anyone serious about cutting edge batteries needs to join RC Groups if you haven't already. Ditto on reviewing Battery University several times--the more you learn, the more you understand of what you read before but went over your head early on.

As far as I can tell here at CPF, HKJ is the "man" now on all things Li-Ion batteries here at CPF. :bow:

The game back in 2006-2007 was trying to figure out which power tool packs had which type of cells that we manually took apart and harvested the cells...hopefully without causing an explosion with our dead shorts when ripping off the securely connected battery tabs. The now bankrupt A123 Systems had the prized Nano Lithium Iron Phosphate cells that really kicked *** in terms of amps, durability, fast recharging, etc. The guys could get their RC Planes in the air and supercharge a backup set of batteries ready to use when the plane landed. Anyway, people can look at these links if they want pretty pictures of the batteries and my description of battery categories. God, has it really been that long ago?




 

GehenSienachlinks

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
112
Location
London
So the Panasonic 18650pf should be one the safest unprotected batteries available now . I'm not sure which two chemistries it uses is it IMR and Li-ion ?
 
Top