Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 46 of 46

Thread: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?

  1. #31

    Default Re: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?

    Quote Originally Posted by csshih View Post
    not at all, LED tech is still improving greatly, especially with Cree finally using thin film and remote phosphor.

    Craig
    You realize LEDs were thin film from day 1 right?

  2. #32
    Flashaholic
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    222

    Default Re: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?

    Huh, just received an email from Cree saying that my XM-L sample has been posted... three months after the sample order was approved!! Had just given up and ordered some from LedRise only a few days ago!

  3. #33
    Flashaholic* csshih's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Illumination Supply
    Posts
    3,897

    Default Re: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?

    Quote Originally Posted by bose301s View Post
    You realize LEDs were thin film from day 1 right?
    forgot the flip chip, duh!

    Craig

  4. #34

    Default Re: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?

    Ahh! I didn't realise the XM-L was over a year old already. This means that when SureFire releases their upcoming 500lumens lights such as the DM2, it may not be using the best LED on the market.

  5. #35

    Default Re: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?

    Actually back thinned which is probably more accurate is new for power LEDs developed by Osram an licensed to Cree and Lumileds and others. New being years.

  6. #36

    Default Re: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?

    New XLamp® XP-G2 LEDs Deliver 20 Percent Efficiency Increase in the XP Footprint


    DURHAM, NC --Cree, Inc. (Nasdaq: CREE) introduces the XLamp® XP-G2 LED to deliver luminaire manufacturers up to 20 percent more lumens per watt and 2.5 times the lumens-per-dollar over the original XP-G LED. The brighter, more efficient XP-G2 LED provides customers an immediate boost in performance and enables manufacturers to use fewer LEDs to get the same brightness at lower cost or increase brightness levels using the same LED count and power.
    Characterized and binned at 85°C, the new XP-G2 LED leverages the same footprint (3.45mm x 3.45mm) and is compatible optically with the original XP-G LED – providing drop-in-ready performance enhancements to shorten the LED fixture design cycle and improve customer time to market. The XP-G2 LED can enable a broad range of high-lumen applications, from indoor and outdoor to portable and lamp retrofits.
    “We have many designs using Cree’s XLamp XP-G LED,” said William Weiss, partner and director of technology, MSi Solid State Lighting. “The new XP-G2 allows us to take full advantage of the benefits of Cree’s latest technology without any significant design changes, improving time-to-market.”
    Built on the revolutionary SC³ Technology Platform, the XP-G2 LEDs combine high light output, reliability and efficacy to deliver up to 151 lumens per watt at 350 mA, 85°C or 165 lumens per watt at 350mA, 25°C in cool white (both at 6000K). In warm white (3000K), the XP-G2 LED delivers up to 133 lumens per watt at 350 mA, 85°C or 145 lumens per watt at 350mA, 25°C. The SC³ Technology Platform leverages Cree’s advanced silicon carbide technology, features advancements in LED chip architecture and phosphor and showcases a new package design to deliver the most advanced lighting- class LED components in the industry.
    Luminaire makers seeking ENERGY STAR® qualification will have access to specification and performance data, including LM-80 reports, which can speed time to market. XP-G2 LEDs are a “successor” product to the original XP-G LED for LM-80 data – accelerating qualification of luminaires using just 3000 hours of LM-80 data, instead of the normal 6000 hours. The XP-G2 LED is also UL-recognized and features a level 4 rating.
    Cree XLamp XP-G2 LED samples are available now and production quantities are available with standard lead times. To locate a distributor or to learn more, please visit www.cree.com/xpg2.

  7. #37

    Default

    And this thread is now a year old, which makes the XM-L over two years old!

    The XP-G2 and MT-G2 are good, but there's still no hint of an XM-L successor. Cree has poured a ton of money into their new silicon carbide platform, but this doesn't appear to be delivering (significantly) more lumens or (at all) better color, just lower cost -- which is great for commercial lighting, but not as relevant for us. I know, I know, we don't matter -- but I really thought we'd be talking about the XJ-Q by now. And complaining that when Cree released the W2 flux bin, it looked a bit green compared to the trusty old V5 and V6.
    Last edited by flashflood; 07-30-2012 at 01:41 AM.

  8. #38
    Flashaholic
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    374

    Default Re: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?


  9. #39
    Flashaholic
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    446

    Default Re: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?

    I've heard there will be a XM-L2 coming out soon as well.

  10. #40
    Flashaholic* bshanahan14rulz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    2,340

    Default Re: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?

    I'd rather see a smaller chip with the same output of the XM-L, even at the cost of a funky optical source like the DA series

  11. #41
    *Flashaholic* fyrstormer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Northern VA, USA
    Posts
    5,441

    Default Re: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?

    What's next? Hopefully something that's easier to focus. The XM-L requires an annoyingly large reflector to get a good beam. The XP-G was just about perfect for pocket-flashlight use.

  12. #42
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fyrstormer View Post
    What's next? Hopefully something that's easier to focus. The XM-L requires an annoyingly large reflector to get a good beam. The XP-G was just about perfect for pocket-flashlight use.
    Hence the XPG2

  13. #43
    *Flashaholic* fyrstormer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Northern VA, USA
    Posts
    5,441

    Default Re: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?

    Quote Originally Posted by yliu View Post
    Hence the XPG2
    Yes, though I've heard the non-flat die in the XPG2 is harder to focus than the XPG1.

  14. #44
    Flashaholic* bshanahan14rulz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    2,340

    Default Re: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?

    As it turns out, the XP-G2 is a flip chip, much like rebels. So it will be just as easy to focus, with no bond wires or anode grid to get in the way.

  15. #45
    Flashaholic* easilyled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Middlesex, UK
    Posts
    4,855

    Default Re: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?

    Quote Originally Posted by fyrstormer View Post
    Yes, though I've heard the non-flat die in the XPG2 is harder to focus than the XPG1.
    Who from and what were their justifications?
    Last edited by easilyled; 08-02-2012 at 10:49 AM. Reason: careless spelling

  16. #46

    Default Re: Cree XM-L is a year old now; what next?

    Quote Originally Posted by easilyled View Post
    Who from and what were their justifications?
    I think he's getting XP-G2 and XT-E mixed up.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •