BirdofPrey
Enlightened
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 449
I recently got my H60w back from ZL after a bad switch replacement. This is by far my most used light. It has the perfect beam for hiking, camping, working on stuff, and with its ultra low setting, for reading at night and not bothering any body.
So, my question is, with the rumored (till its released, its a rumor) return of the 18650 headland, why would they NOT use a non reflector lens like the H60?
I can't see the advantage to have a spot and flood like most everything they make now. That alone will render it unusable for most of the things I use it for.
I can see where some would favor throw over flood but why not make both?
I've sold several ZL lights just by people loving the beam mine has. To keep such a buttery smooth beam but just make it brighter would just be fantastic.
Oh well, guess I'm just stuck with what I got. Granted, I love it but brighter IS better. I use my wife's 501w occasionaly, and its nice, but its always nicer to get back to the brightness of my 60.
Thoughts?
Sent via HTC Thunderbolt using Tapatalk.
Sent via HTC Thunderbolt using Tapatalk.
So, my question is, with the rumored (till its released, its a rumor) return of the 18650 headland, why would they NOT use a non reflector lens like the H60?
I can't see the advantage to have a spot and flood like most everything they make now. That alone will render it unusable for most of the things I use it for.
I can see where some would favor throw over flood but why not make both?
I've sold several ZL lights just by people loving the beam mine has. To keep such a buttery smooth beam but just make it brighter would just be fantastic.
Oh well, guess I'm just stuck with what I got. Granted, I love it but brighter IS better. I use my wife's 501w occasionaly, and its nice, but its always nicer to get back to the brightness of my 60.
Thoughts?
Sent via HTC Thunderbolt using Tapatalk.
Sent via HTC Thunderbolt using Tapatalk.