ArmyTek
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 65

Thread: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

  1. #31
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Chesapeake, VA
    Posts
    646

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Thanks for the review.
    Great information. Between your and selfbuilt's reviews convinced me to buy the production version of this light.

  2. #32
    Flashaholic* candle lamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    1,079

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by 357mag1 View Post
    Thanks for the review.
    Great information. Between your and selfbuilt's reviews convinced me to buy the production version of this light.
    Thank you too. 357mag1

    May I ask you a question? What's your reason for making a purchase of it?
    In my case, I love the upgraded circuit, the use of the unprotected (flat-top) 18650 cells, and nice improvement according to the feedbacks.
    Latest Review : Jil Lite PenENT Review

  3. #33
    Flashaholic BWX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    333

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Well here's why I ordered the Xtar S1- because my brightest lights are my TK45, Spark SL6 800CW, and O-Light i6 Paladin... all in the same 'class' of performance. Great for their size, etc., but now that I am using 18650 batteries, it's time for more.

    I've been wanting to upgrade to a multiple XML, multiple 18650 'throw-ish' light, not necessarily a dedicated thrower like an SR90, but more of a thrower than my TK45 or SL6. Size isn't an issue, I just want something that kicks ass.

    As soon as I saw the production version S1 reviews, and saw how it had better regulation, better tint, more output, tweaked machining, and everything else, I was sold.

    The top quality machining and overall quality was important. The beam ''throwy-ness'' was a perfect compromise I thought. The overall output is great. Now came price- I wasn't sure how much I wanted to spend on my new beast of a light, but I couldn't spend too much. After I read all the reviews and decided I was interested, I shopped around a little for the best price. Once I saw how much I could get it for, I didn't hesitate. I though it was a hell of a deal.

    The test pre-production version was an even better deal.. about $30 cheaper, but with all the improvements, the final production unit was well worth the asking price. $200 for a light like this? Amazing deal.. I thought I'd be spending quite a bit more for a quality flashlight with this level of performance actually. I just can't believe they aren't all sold out already..
    Led flashlights...|II|Fenix LD20+ Premium R4, TK45|Quark AA/2AA R5&S2 x2, Preon 1/2 S2/ h.CRI x2 |Olight i6 Paladin|Spark SL6-800CW, ST6 500CW headlamp|Xtar S1|Crelant 7G5 V2|Eagletac D25LC2|ZL SC600 MKI b U2|Thrunite TN12 '14|II|

  4. #34
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Chesapeake, VA
    Posts
    646

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by candle lamp View Post
    Thank you too. 357mag1

    May I ask you a question? What's your reason for making a purchase of it?
    In my case, I love the upgraded circuit, the use of the unprotected (flat-top) 18650 cells, and nice improvement according to the feedbacks.
    Well my main reason is addiction!!! I really don't need another light.
    I was interested in the light after seeing your review of the pre-production version but wouldn't buy it because of poor regulation and incompatibility with flat-top cells. I was enamoured with the smaller format powerful light with robust build.
    Once you and selfbuilt reported the regulation was fixed and flat-tops work I put one on order.
    You particularly brought out the flat-top compatibility which was very important to me.

    Thanks again for a comprehensive review.

  5. #35
    Flashaholic* BLUE LED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,262

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Thank you for the detailed review. You certainly convinced me to buy a production S1.

  6. #36
    Flashaholic* candle lamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    1,079

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by BWX View Post
    Well here's why I ordered the Xtar S1- because my brightest lights are my TK45, Spark SL6 800CW, and O-Light i6 Paladin... all in the same 'class' of performance.
    They are really good flashlights as well.

    Quote Originally Posted by BWX View Post
    The test pre-production version was an even better deal.. about $30 cheaper, but with all the improvements, the final production unit was well worth the asking price. $200 for a light like this? Amazing deal..
    I agree with you.

    Quote Originally Posted by 357mag1 View Post
    Well my main reason is addiction!!! I really don't need another light.
    It's more applicable to me. Now I have two.

    Quote Originally Posted by 357mag1 View Post
    You particularly brought out the flat-top compatibility which was very important to me.
    Thanks again for a comprehensive review.
    It's my pleasure.

    Quote Originally Posted by BLUE LED View Post
    Thank you for the detailed review. You certainly convinced me to buy a production S1.
    You're welcome.

    I hope all of you will be pleased with it and use it very usefully.
    Latest Review : Jil Lite PenENT Review

  7. #37
    Flashaholic
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    120

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    About the flat-top cells issue: if the positive contact is still a flat metal plate, I don't understand why the production version works while the pre-production version doesn't work.

    I don't have many flat-top cells, so please excuse my speculation: what happens if you use three flat-top cells whose positive contact is flush with the outside of the plastic wrapper, so that when the cells are placed into the S1, the positive contacts on the cells may just barely touch the positive contact plate in the light, but because of manufacturing imperfections, e.g. a bump on the plastic wrapper, one of the three cells actually doesn't make electrical contact? Then you'd have the light being driven only by two cells, possibly intermittently as the light is jostled.

    Also, let's say the above does happen, and one day you're out for a walk and the light is on High for 20 mins on two cells, but you jostle the light and now all three cells make contact. The "fresh" cell would dump a lot of current into the two "used" cells until they equalized. Is that unhealthy for the batteries?

  8. #38
    Flashaholic BWX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    333

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    ^^ That doesn't sound like a good thing. Seems reasonable that it could happen too!
    Led flashlights...|II|Fenix LD20+ Premium R4, TK45|Quark AA/2AA R5&S2 x2, Preon 1/2 S2/ h.CRI x2 |Olight i6 Paladin|Spark SL6-800CW, ST6 500CW headlamp|Xtar S1|Crelant 7G5 V2|Eagletac D25LC2|ZL SC600 MKI b U2|Thrunite TN12 '14|II|

  9. #39

    Au Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by peteybaby View Post
    About the flat-top cells issue: if the positive contact is still a flat metal plate, I don't understand why the production version works while the pre-production version doesn't work.

    I don't have many flat-top cells, so please excuse my speculation: what happens if you use three flat-top cells whose positive contact is flush with the outside of the plastic wrapper, so that when the cells are placed into the S1, the positive contacts on the cells may just barely touch the positive contact plate in the light, but because of manufacturing imperfections, e.g. a bump on the plastic wrapper, one of the three cells actually doesn't make electrical contact? Then you'd have the light being driven only by two cells, possibly intermittently as the light is jostled.

    Also, let's say the above does happen, and one day you're out for a walk and the light is on High for 20 mins on two cells, but you jostle the light and now all three cells make contact. The "fresh" cell would dump a lot of current into the two "used" cells until they equalized. Is that unhealthy for the batteries?
    For you too, that current = heat, and, can lead to an explosion or fire...if the protection circuits don't trip when they need to, etc....and the cell can be toast either way.

    When using lights that take more than one cell, you want the cells to be matched as closely as possible, the same state of charge, and, the same internal resistance. Differences are what cause all the problems in this scenario.
    Last edited by TEEJ; 04-26-2012 at 08:43 AM.

  10. #40
    Flashaholic* candle lamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    1,079

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by peteybaby View Post
    About the flat-top cells issue: if the positive contact is still a flat metal plate, I don't understand why the production version works while the pre-production version doesn't work.
    Hi peteybaby,
    It's bacause the production version has a shorter distance between the positve contact plate and the negative contact disc than the pre-production version. ( i.e. The positive contact plate block of the final version is a bit increased in length while the battery tube length of the final version is a bit reduced.)

    Quote Originally Posted by peteybaby View Post
    I don't have many flat-top cells, so please excuse my speculation: what happens if you use three flat-top cells whose positive contact is flush with the outside of the plastic wrapper, so that when the cells are placed into the S1, the positive contacts on the cells may just barely touch the positive contact plate in the light, but because of manufacturing imperfections, e.g. a bump on the plastic wrapper, one of the three cells actually doesn't make electrical contact? Then you'd have the light being driven only by two cells, possibly intermittently as the light is jostled.
    Also, let's say the above does happen, and one day you're out for a walk and the light is on High for 20 mins on two cells, but you jostle the light and now all three cells make contact. The "fresh" cell would dump a lot of current into the two "used" cells until they equalized. Is that unhealthy for the batteries?
    In such cases(i.e. the positive contact is flush with the plastic wrapper or a bump on the wrapper), all cells may not make electrical contact as you mention. So one or two cells should be overloaded.
    I have some flat-top unprotected 18650 cells as shown in the picture and LG 3000mAh among them has almost a pure flat-top positive contact. But it's not flush with the platic wrapper or slightly higher than the plastic wrapper. I've tested with these cells for around 20 mins and gotton the almost same voltages of three cells. If someone is concerned about this matter, I would suggest using a spacer or small magnet on the positive contact.



    Also I'd recommend they use the batteries of same type, same brand, same charging level, same capacity, and don't mix batteries of old & new.
    XTAR recommends the use of the protected batteries for safety in the manual.
    Latest Review : Jil Lite PenENT Review

  11. #41
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Chesapeake, VA
    Posts
    646

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    I received my S1 and did some preliminary testing.

    I will list what I like, dislike and a concern with the light.

    Like:
    1. Very close to the TK70 in performance on Max setting.
    2. Much smaller form factor than the TK70
    3. Being able to set my own output level
    4. Is built like a tank like the discontinued TK20.
    5. Nimh D cells will fit in the tube. I ran it with 3D cells and it worked great. On the bench of course, no way will the length of 3D nimhs fit with the tailcap. Now if we could convince XTAR to produce an extension so we have the option of Nimh D cells.

    Dislike:
    1. 658u Amps draw when in the OFF position. That will drain a 2600mah 18650s dry in about 5.5 months. Make sure you loosen that tailcap.
    2. I have accidentally turned from "Preselect" to "Select" about half a dozen times so far. Which messes up my carefully chosen "Preselect" setting. Wish it had a lock out feature where you had to turn quickly between "Preselect" and "Select" twice to initiate changing the "Preselect" level. This would keep idiots like me from repeatedly going through the ramp sequence to reset my "Preselect" level.

    Concern:
    Tailcap current with 3 fully charged IMR 18650 cells measured 7.86amps at the tailcap. It is the same with my LG 2800mah cells, some of the best Lithium cells I've tested. Lesser quality cells or slightly depleted cells all read lower tailcap current. This is backwards for a regulated light. Slightly depleted cells should draw more current at the tailcap to maintain the same current through the LED.

    So all I can conclude is my light is not regulated like the production versions Selfbuilt and Candle Lamp received for testing. If other purchasers confirm their light does the same we have to wonder why XTAR sent regulated versions to testers and gave the public unregulated versions.

    I'm going out on a limb here without all of the facts (perhaps others have regulated lights and mine is a fluke). I can think of at least one reason why XTAR might be inclined to do this (If they did it would still be wrong). The S1 starts out drawing almost 8amps using freshly charged batteries so by mid run on a regulated light it should be pulling over 9amps. This works out to over 3amps per battery and will climb higher further into the run. Perhaps XTAR is worried such a high draw could cause issues with some of the lower/questionable quality Lithium Ion cells on the market.

    For those of you who might be a little fuzzy on how a regulated light should function. Lets use my fully regulated TK70 as an example. With fresh cells I measure about 7amps at the tailcap and after the cells have been in the light for about 15 minutes tailcap current has already climbed to 8.25amps and will climb even higher as the batteries near the end of their capacity. That is how a regulated light works.

    Without a doubt my XTAR is not a regulated light or at least it is very poorly regulated like the pre-production version.

    So does anyone else have a good meter and the ability to verify tailcap measurements on their "PRODUCTION" version XTAR S1?
    Last edited by 357mag1; 04-27-2012 at 10:08 PM. Reason: Fix bad english

  12. #42
    Flashaholic BWX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    333

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by 357mag1 View Post
    So all I can conclude is my light is not regulated like the production versions Selfbuilt and Candle Lamp received for testing.
    Damn! I paid extra to get that regulation, and I only use high quality 18650 cells.
    If that's true about the lack of regulation, I'm going to be pissed off.

    I do have a digital multimeter, but have never measured current draw on anything with it. I don't even have clips on the leads, just probes.

    I haven't received my S1 in the mail yet. I ordered it on the 22nd from hkequipment, who knows when I'll get it. When I do finally get it, if I can, I'll try to confirm what you found with the current draw.

    I wonder if you got a pre-production test version? Can you confirm it's the final production version by comparing the machining to photos? Just making sure, I guess it's possible you got a test version in a box and everything by accident? Of course you probably already checked, but ya never know.
    Led flashlights...|II|Fenix LD20+ Premium R4, TK45|Quark AA/2AA R5&S2 x2, Preon 1/2 S2/ h.CRI x2 |Olight i6 Paladin|Spark SL6-800CW, ST6 500CW headlamp|Xtar S1|Crelant 7G5 V2|Eagletac D25LC2|ZL SC600 MKI b U2|Thrunite TN12 '14|II|

  13. #43
    Flashaholic* BLUE LED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,262

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    I have ordered the S1 production version because of the regulation on high quality 18650 Cells. I will not be happy if it turns out to he semi regulated. Please do check the head for the differences and confirm that you have a production S1.

  14. #44
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Chesapeake, VA
    Posts
    646

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    I did verify my flashlight has the machining of the production version. I even contacted the vendor to make sure I was getting a production version prior to purchase.

    I sent the vendor an email about my concern with the lack of regulation. His reply was the "The S1 is wired in parrallel, it should drop in current draw".

    For those of you who do not have an electronic back ground (I have over 30 years) you may still recall Ohm's Law from school. P=IE Power is found by multiplying current by voltage. Without trying to factor in voltage sag under a load lets use 4.2 volts X 7.86 amps for a total of roughly 33 watts of power. When the battery voltage drops to 4V current must increase to 8.25 amps to maintain 33 watts. At 3.5 volts current has to be at almost 9.43 amps to maintain power out.

    Again the above doesn't take into consideration voltage sag under load but should allow those of you without an electronics background to understand why the current draw at the tailcap will ALWAYS climb on a properly regulated light.

    Something I forgot to mention last night. When I position the S1 ring to "High" it takes the light about two seconds to come up to full brightness. Not sure why they have that feature, it would be more appropriate on an Ican but perhaps slowly bringing an LED up to full power can help extend it's life as well.

  15. #45

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    You can get the latest versions form MD-lightsource, they just got them in.



    We get 12% off for CPF members to boot. I think that's only ~ $220 (The list was $299, but MD only charges $249, and the discount is off the $249)


  16. #46
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Chesapeake, VA
    Posts
    646

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by BWX View Post
    I do have a digital multimeter, but have never measured current draw on anything with it. I don't even have clips on the leads, just probes.
    You don't need clips. The following procedure applies to most Fluke DVMs.

    First some safety information. Safety for your batteries and meter and in rare circumstances the individual as well. We read voltage by connecting the leads across the battery terminals. This puts the meter in parallel with the battery. The meter has a very high internal resistance on the voltage setting so only a trickle of current passes through the meter for it to read voltage. If that wasn't the case the meter itself would add a load to the battery and cause voltage sag giving you inaccurate readings.

    When reading current you have to be in series with the circuit. When I move my leads to the current jacks on the multimeter now the internal resistance of the meter is almost zero. The meter in fact uses a piece of precision wire and reads the very small voltage drop across that wire. The more amps going through the wire the higher the voltage drop. So the meter is really still reading voltage but in a way that can supply you with an accurate current reading.

    Why have I bored you with this information. I wanted you to understand when setup to read current your meter is acting as a wire. If you forget and connect it across the terminals of a battery it will short out the battery just as if you placed a piece of wire across the terminals. Several things can happen. If your meter isn't fuse protected and the battery is strong enough it will damage your meter. The leads will get hot. If you do this on something as powerful as a car battery your leads can get burnt (arc welded) or melt. Your battery could explode!!! Explosion is unlikely but possible. Please be extra careful when using the current function of your DVM.

    So here is the procedure.
    Leave the black lead in the "COM" jack and move the red lead to the "A" jack.
    Rotate the DVM selector dial to the ma/A position.
    Now your Fluke meter is ready to read current, others may require slightly different procedures. Hopefully you have a manual if it isn't obvious after reading the above.

    To read current on the S1.
    Take the tailcap off the S1 and lay a flat fender washer or disc magnet on top of the batteries. The washer or magnet is just a way to tie the negative ends of the batteries together much like the tailcap itself does.
    Now rotate the light switch to "High".
    Make firm contact with your red probe (I lay it flat and press down fairly hard) to the top bare aluminum part of the battery tube.
    Use the black prove to push down on the washer/magnet you placed on top of the batteries.
    Hold it until the light ramps up to full brightness.
    Read your DVM digital display.

    That is it. You may want to make yourself some short thick leads just for taking current readings like I have. The small and fairly long leads of most meters have enough resistance to affect current reading when getting much above 2amps. You can still check regulation of flashlights by using your meter to complete the current path the tailcap usually does.

    Hope this was helpful. I will try to get someone to assist me with some photos though I suspect there are some on this forum if one were to search diligently.

  17. #47
    Flashaholic* BLUE LED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,262

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Perhaps a regulation test is in order to see if yours matches the S1 reviewed. I will make the time to test mine when it arrives. I have AW, Redilast and Eagletac 18650 3100 mAh cells.

  18. #48
    Flashaholic BWX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    333

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Two full seconds to get to max output? I don't remember hearing anything about that either.. but I remember someone saying it ramps up quickly.. I have a light that's like that- the Fenix LD20 premium r4 does that, but very quickly, nothing like two seconds. It sounds like the Xtar S1 that we are getting as a "production version", is different than the "production version" sent to people for reviews. At least the circuit is different anyway. If that's the case, that's deliberately misleading. Not cool at all.

    edit
    I'll make sure I have the correct type of multi meter and perform the test when I get my S1.
    Last edited by BWX; 04-28-2012 at 01:58 PM.
    Led flashlights...|II|Fenix LD20+ Premium R4, TK45|Quark AA/2AA R5&S2 x2, Preon 1/2 S2/ h.CRI x2 |Olight i6 Paladin|Spark SL6-800CW, ST6 500CW headlamp|Xtar S1|Crelant 7G5 V2|Eagletac D25LC2|ZL SC600 MKI b U2|Thrunite TN12 '14|II|

  19. #49

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by 357mag1 View Post
    Tailcap current with 3 fully charged IMR 18650 cells measured 7.86amps at the tailcap. It is the same with my LG 2800mah cells, some of the best Lithium cells I've tested. Lesser quality cells or slightly depleted cells all read lower tailcap current. This is backwards for a regulated light. Slightly depleted cells should draw more current at the tailcap to maintain the same current through the LED.

    So all I can conclude is my light is not regulated like the production versions Selfbuilt and Candle Lamp received for testing. If other purchasers confirm their light does the same we have to wonder why XTAR sent regulated versions to testers and gave the public unregulated versions.
    Actually, I suspect the issue is likely with the DMM in the current path.

    My production sample (which shows flat output regulation) behaves the same way as yours if I do measures with my DMM hooked up. That is, on partially charged 18650 IMR, I get a lower current draw on my DMM compared to fully charged.

    The reason for this (which I can confirm in my case) is that the light is NOT actually running at full brightness when I hook it up to a cell through my DMM. This is why the lower current draw is observed.

    Based on some discussion with HKJ in my earlier pre-production review, I suspect this has to do with resistance in the DMM and/or leads (at least in my case).

    Note the same goes if you run it for a few minutes - with my DMM hooked up, the current draw drops fairly rapidly (as does the output to match). But if you run without the DMM, the output stays constant.

    Quote Originally Posted by 357mag1 View Post
    Something I forgot to mention last night. When I position the S1 ring to "High" it takes the light about two seconds to come up to full brightness. Not sure why they have that feature, it would be more appropriate on an Ican but perhaps slowly bringing an LED up to full power can help extend it's life as well.
    Quote Originally Posted by BWX View Post
    Two full seconds to get to max output? I don't remember hearing anything about that either..
    Again, this is normal - my sample does the same thing.

    I suspect it is to be more "gentle" on the batteries, but it may also give the circuit the opportunity to NOT ramp up to full brightness if it detects an issue with the power source (which may be the case when the DMM is in the circuit path).
    Last edited by selfbuilt; 04-28-2012 at 06:32 PM.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Outdoor 100-yard Beamshots 2011. Latest: Olight M18 Striker.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  20. #50
    Flashaholic BWX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    333

    Thumbs up Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    That's good.. I hope that's all the issue is.
    Led flashlights...|II|Fenix LD20+ Premium R4, TK45|Quark AA/2AA R5&S2 x2, Preon 1/2 S2/ h.CRI x2 |Olight i6 Paladin|Spark SL6-800CW, ST6 500CW headlamp|Xtar S1|Crelant 7G5 V2|Eagletac D25LC2|ZL SC600 MKI b U2|Thrunite TN12 '14|II|

  21. #51
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Chesapeake, VA
    Posts
    646

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by selfbuilt View Post
    Actually, I suspect the issue is likely with the DMM in the current path.
    selfbuilt,

    First I would like to thank you for taking the time to let us know how your review light acted when testing tailcap current.

    I agree the meter can start to influence current readings particularly at these higher current levels. I have taken steps to minimize that by using heavy gauge short leads.

    Even if the leads and meter's internal resistance is having an influence on current readings with the S1, I believe it would be minimal and we should still see a rise in current as voltage drops. I have measured powerful regulated lights that draw even more current than the S1 and they all show a rise in current as battery voltage declines during the run cycle.

    As I explained above and you probably already know when the meter leads are in position to read current they are connected by a precision piece of wire. With my particular setup the resistance would be extremely small. If the S1 circuitry is truly that sensitive it must be very fragile in design or barely able to do the job. In fact looking at the tailcap I would almost bet my meter and leads have less resistance.

    Once again I appreciate you letting us know how your review light behaved. Hopefully my light is truly regulated but the current readings make no sense to me.

  22. #52
    Flashaholic BWX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    333

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Oh crap. I ordered it on April 22nd. I look today at tracking..
    April 28, 2012, 10:32 pm ------- Processed Through Sort Facility ---------- ISC NEW YORK NY(USPS) -------- Registered Mail

    I've never seen ''ISC NEW YORK NY(USPS)'' ever, so I looked it up. Looks like it's stuck at customes.. or could be.

    Might be a while before I can test it.
    Led flashlights...|II|Fenix LD20+ Premium R4, TK45|Quark AA/2AA R5&S2 x2, Preon 1/2 S2/ h.CRI x2 |Olight i6 Paladin|Spark SL6-800CW, ST6 500CW headlamp|Xtar S1|Crelant 7G5 V2|Eagletac D25LC2|ZL SC600 MKI b U2|Thrunite TN12 '14|II|

  23. #53
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Chesapeake, VA
    Posts
    646

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    I don't have a light meter so must rely on my eyes to verify a regulated output. To do this reliably I needed a light close to the output of the S1.

    I discharged some Panasonic 3100mah batteries down to 3.85volts and topped off some LG 2800mah 18650s at 4.22 volts.

    Then I carried the S1 and a TK70 outside to do some comparison testing. The two lights are very comparable with the TK70 being just slightly brighter and producing a little more throw on the highest settings. Doing side by side testing I couldn't see where the S1 was any brighter with the freshly charged batteries than with the Panasonics at 3.85volts.

    I have to thank selfbuilt for the information he provided. It was his tailcap readings that prompted me to think of a meaningful way to test the lumen output at different battery voltages. As stated above I can't see where the light is any dimmer with the lower voltage of the Panasonics or any brighter with the freshly charged LGs.

    I'm feeling better about my S1 even though I had no intention of returning the light even if it wasn't properly regulated. By the way, the vendor (sbflashlights) offered to take the light back and provide a full refund if I wasn't satisfied. You can't ask for better service than that.

    Just too nice of a light for the size and I really like the rugged build.

    I would still love an extension to allow the use of 3D Nimh cells or even 3 Alkaline D cells in a pinch.

  24. #54
    Flashaholic* candle lamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    1,079

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by selfbuilt View Post
    Actually, I suspect the issue is likely with the DMM in the current path.
    My production sample (which shows flat output regulation) behaves the same way as yours if I do measures with my DMM hooked up. That is, on partially charged 18650 IMR, I get a lower current draw on my DMM compared to fully charged.
    The reason for this (which I can confirm in my case) is that the light is NOT actually running at full brightness when I hook it up to a cell through my DMM. This is why the lower current draw is observed.
    Based on some discussion with HKJ in my earlier pre-production review, I suspect this has to do with resistance in the DMM and/or leads (at least in my case).
    Note the same goes if you run it for a few minutes - with my DMM hooked up, the current draw drops fairly rapidly (as does the output to match). But if you run without the DMM, the output stays constant.

    Again, this is normal - my sample does the same thing.
    Many thanks for your time & detaild explanation. Selfbuilt!

    Quote Originally Posted by 357mag1 View Post
    I don't have a light meter so must rely on my eyes to verify a regulated output. To do this reliably I needed a light close to the output of the S1.
    I discharged some Panasonic 3100mah batteries down to 3.85volts and topped off some LG 2800mah 18650s at 4.22 volts.
    Then I carried the S1 and a TK70 outside to do some comparison testing. The two lights are very comparable with the TK70 being just slightly brighter and producing a little more throw on the highest settings. Doing side by side testing I couldn't see where the S1 was any brighter with the freshly charged batteries than with the Panasonics at 3.85volts.

    I have to thank selfbuilt for the information he provided. It was his tailcap readings that prompted me to think of a meaningful way to test the lumen output at different battery voltages. As stated above I can't see where the light is any dimmer with the lower voltage of the Panasonics or any brighter with the freshly charged LGs.

    I'm feeling better about my S1 even though I had no intention of returning the light even if it wasn't properly regulated. By the way, the vendor (sbflashlights) offered to take the light back and provide a full refund if I wasn't satisfied. You can't ask for better service than that.

    Just too nice of a light for the size and I really like the rugged build.
    I'm sorry that this was brought to my attention so late. I just saw your #41 reply today, but really didn't know how to explain the reason due to my ignorance.

    I can tell you to check the brightness (or output) by using the digital camera as shown in the picture.



    Some digital camera has a function to press the shutter every minute or at any interval as you wish by itself. So you can check the brightness difference according to the regulation time.
    Otherwise you can take a picture every 10 minutes yourself. (But don't forget to put on your sunglass!) In my view, I think this way is better than seeing with your own eyes.

    I don't know this is helpful to you.

    KyeongHo,
    Last edited by candle lamp; 04-30-2012 at 07:02 AM.
    Latest Review : Jil Lite PenENT Review

  25. #55

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by 357mag1 View Post
    I have to thank selfbuilt for the information he provided. It was his tailcap readings that prompted me to think of a meaningful way to test the lumen output at different battery voltages. As stated above I can't see where the light is any dimmer with the lower voltage of the Panasonics or any brighter with the freshly charged LGs.
    Good, glad to hear your light does indeed seem to be regulated for output when run normally.

    As for the issue with getting accurate current draws with a DMM (even a good one like yours), I believe the problem comes from the low margin the S1 has for maintaining regulation (voltage-wise). There aren't too many lights out there that can produce this sort of output on a single 3.7V Li-ion source (which is the case here, since the three cells are in parallel). Most other lights I've tested involve a higher voltage battery source (i.e., multiple cells in series). And note by the way that the pre-production version couldn't regulate at all, even when run normally on its battery source. Xtar has managed to adjust to circuit to allow for flat-stabilized regulation on typical cells in the production version, but I'm guessing even the small amount of resistance on the 10A port is enough to drop the voltage down to where regulation won't kick-in (i.e., it is a narrow margin).

    Ultimately, the only way to know for sure is to interrogate the circuit directly, with a bench-top power supply. Unfortunately, I don't have one. I wonder if HKJ was sent a production version for testing? That would be helpful, since his original voltage sweeps of the pre-production version explained the failure to stabilize on that light.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Outdoor 100-yard Beamshots 2011. Latest: Olight M18 Striker.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  26. #56
    HKJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    6,266

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by selfbuilt View Post
    I wonder if HKJ was sent a production version for testing? That would be helpful, since his original voltage sweeps of the pre-production version explained the failure to stabilize on that light.
    No, I did not get a production version.
    My website with flashlight, battery and charger information: lygte-info.
    More than 200 battery reviews and 80 charger reviews.
    Compare 18650 LiIon batteries or smaller (RCR123, 16340, 14500, 10450) LiIon batteries.

  27. #57
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Chesapeake, VA
    Posts
    646

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by selfbuilt View Post
    As for the issue with getting accurate current draws with a DMM (even a good one like yours), I believe the problem comes from the low margin the S1 has for maintaining regulation (voltage-wise). There aren't too many lights out there that can produce this sort of output on a single 3.7V Li-ion source (which is the case here, since the three cells are in parallel). Most other lights I've tested involve a higher voltage battery source (i.e., multiple cells in series). And note by the way that the pre-production version couldn't regulate at all, even when run normally on its battery source. Xtar has managed to adjust to circuit to allow for flat-stabilized regulation on typical cells in the production version, but I'm guessing even the small amount of resistance on the 10A port is enough to drop the voltage down to where regulation won't kick-in (i.e., it is a narrow margin).
    I think that is the only explanation that makes sense. My meter even with the short leads must be adding more resistance and causing less voltage to reach the regulation circuitry which in turn causes it to assume the batteries are depleted and decreases current draw to the LED. I figured the S1 rotating tailcap would have trouble being lower in resistance than my setup. Apparently that is not the case which means it is well designed (a good thing).

  28. #58
    Enlightened
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    90

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by BWX View Post
    The test pre-production version was an even better deal.. about $30 cheaper, but with all the improvements, the final production unit was well worth the asking price. $200 for a light like this? Amazing deal.. I thought I'd be spending quite a bit more for a quality flashlight with this level of performance actually. I just can't believe they aren't all sold out already..
    Where do you get it for $200?
    Thrunite TN30, Fenix Tk35, Klarus TX10, Olight SR Mini, Olight SR52, Olight R40, Olight S10 Baton, Fenix E05, Led Lenser P7.2, Thrunite Ti2, Sunwayman D40A

  29. #59

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruno28 View Post
    Where do you get it for $200?
    The pre-production (uncorrected issues) S1's are on sale for ~ $160, and the newest (Corrected/regulated, etc...) versions are on sale for ~ $224, MD-Lightsource has the new ones shipping from the USA for that price with CPF discount.

    The Pre-production ones ship from China.

  30. #60
    Flashaholic BWX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    333

    Default Re: XTAR S1 - Test Version and Final Version Review

    Production ver. from hkequipment. Ordered on the 22nd and still haven't gotten it yet and don't know when I will... it'll probably be here by end of this week, could be tomorrow though, who knows. It was $250 with $50 off for CPF/ etc forum. I knew shipping would be longer when I ordered it. I figured it was worth it.
    Led flashlights...|II|Fenix LD20+ Premium R4, TK45|Quark AA/2AA R5&S2 x2, Preon 1/2 S2/ h.CRI x2 |Olight i6 Paladin|Spark SL6-800CW, ST6 500CW headlamp|Xtar S1|Crelant 7G5 V2|Eagletac D25LC2|ZL SC600 MKI b U2|Thrunite TN12 '14|II|

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •