Tesla cars allowing batteries to become fully discharged?

bobbagum

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
74
Location
Thailand
Not sure whether to post this in battery forum or here, since the car uses 18650s...

[url]http://jalopnik.com/5887265/tesla-motors-devastating-design-problem


A[/URL]fter reading this article, I'm curious, what were the engineers prioritizing in designing such circuit that would allow batteries to be discharged with no safety cutoff, I mean it's a car, there's plenty of room, I've never used a phone or laptop computers that would allow itself to discharge lithium batteries to the point of damage.... anyone care to speculate?
 

SHADE02

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
142
Location
Mountain CiTy..
woOW, I just read the entire article, man... 40k USD for a new spare batterie,,, thats sucks


and terrible CS from tesla too...
and yes , why in the name of hell, they, just simply no put some baterie volts cut-off or something??????!!
 

TEEJ

Flashaholic
Joined
Jan 12, 2012
Messages
7,490
Location
NJ
Probably were more worried about maximizing range, and the minimizing the rage a customer would feel towards them if the battery had enough juice to get them to that next outlet, but just refused to drive a little further, etc.

It DOES seem short sighted to not include some sort of safety net though, perhaps a setting to cut the parasitic drain at least to avoid continued discharges?
 

bobbagum

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
74
Location
Thailand
would the protection circuit still drain the battery even after it has dropped enough to trip the cutoff? I'm talking for normal 'protected' cells that we normally use here....

btw the roadster uses 6[SIZE=-2] [/SIZE]831 18650s, if someone were to buy a replacement for all that with say... AW's cells, that would be.... ouch
 

ssvqwnp

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Oct 2, 2010
Messages
101
Location
Louisiana
It seems to me they should just give the cars primaries and make the whole thing disposable... The article makes it appear that's what'll happen with the Model S with it's lower price tag and proposed more expensive battery(s).


[Also, for those that didn't catch it, the first sentence was sarcastic. You know who you are.]
 

fnsooner

Enlightened
Joined
Nov 5, 2009
Messages
755
Tesla was afraid they would get sued by Surefire if they installed a lockout tailcap. :)
 
Last edited:

yellow

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 31, 2002
Messages
4,626
Location
Baden.at
its the problem with ppl doing something but have not full understanding of everything.
They probably have a hell of a designer,
technicials/electricians for normal cars, used to lead batteries, ...
:rolleyes:
 

uk_caver

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 9, 2007
Messages
1,408
Location
Central UK
Would this still happen even if the battery was entirely disconnected from the car?

It's not clear what a car needs to use meaningful power for when it's unoccupied.

Are there no consumer-protection laws which would support someone with a bricked car taking action against a manufacturer who seemed to have made some pretty poor design decisions, and who had limited the severity of warnings for the sake of not putting customers off the vehicles.
 

CKOD

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
708
it loses 50% of its charge in 1 week? with a 50+ KWh battery pack, thats ~150 watts of load constant. Thats definitely not energy star compliant :p I wonder what they are running, battery heater etc? maybe understandable in a cold climate, but not a temperate one. Also shame on them if they cant manage to eek out 150W to maintain the car over a 100' extension cord, thats only 2A or so after charger inefficiencies.
 

uk_caver

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 9, 2007
Messages
1,408
Location
Central UK
Shame on them if a charger (whether plugged into a long extension lead or not) doesn't indicate when it is and when it isn't supplying meaningful current.
 

uk_caver

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 9, 2007
Messages
1,408
Location
Central UK
Also shame on them if they cant manage to eek out 150W to maintain the car over a 100' extension cord, thats only 2A or so after charger inefficiencies.
Even if they were pulling 10A through a 10A rated cable (~1mm2), that's only something like an ohm in total (both ways) for 100ft, losing 10V.
 

Sub_Umbra

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
4,748
Location
la bonne vie en Amérique
The main issue of this thread is moot as modern electric cars aren't going anywhere (with the possible exception of up to the 7-11 for some Ben and Jerry's for Ed Bagley Jr)

-- We don't have the GRIDs it would take to charge all of those electric cars. Especially the 'pie in the sky' hype about the ones that pick up a full charge in two hours. OK, so scores of millions all drive their little cars home and plug them in at 6p. Our grids can not cope with a hot day AND NO ELECTRIC CARS all plugging in at the same time.

-- We don't even have a plan to change our grids to be able to handle it at some vague, nebulous time in the future. (That is really a bad sign in Western culture where we're pretty much willing to lie about nearly anything in the future if it will make us a few bucks in the now.)

-- The batteries are expensive, fragile, short-lived and like the steam car in
"The Carpetbaggers" they are not anything that most want to have anywhere near them in a car accident.

-- All 'Rare Earth' minerals come from China. This will not change in the next ten years. Rare Earth minerals are very important to schemes like this. Without Rare Earth minerals your iPod would weigh three pounds. Rare Earth minerals are not being exported by China the way they have been in the past. Without Rare Earth minerals all of this talk of efficient electric cars is nothing but hucksters pumping venture capital and hoping for inflated IPOs. My point here is that if Westerners decide that they MUST drive electric cars they will, in fact, be made in China into the significant future.

Frankly, I don't even think that Americans are dumb enough to go this route, especially after it is pointed out to them repeatedly that for all of their 'greener than thou' smugness they have somehow figured out how to feel good about electric cars that actually run on coal. Yup, that's right, in the States most electricity comes from coal. And yes, it will have to be pointed out repeatedly.

Hey, what could possibly go wrong? I ax ya?

If I like coal I'm a Luddite, but if I support today's electric cars that run on coal I'm warm, fuzzy, green and adorable.
 
Last edited:

hopkins

Enlightened
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
906
Location
California
The Tesla battery module weighs 900lbs. Its liquid cooled. It has 6,800 18650's inside of it. Each of the cells has it own temperature
sensor and 2 fuses that can be individually triggered to open if a runaway thermal event occurs. There are 12 microprocessors inside the battery
module that are always on. Cannot be turned off.

(who knows how many computers are in the rest of the car?) (Lots)

These 12 microprocessors are always monitoring for unsafe cell conditions and are a constant parasitic drain on the 375volt 53Kw battery.
There is no way to access them as they are embedded in the 900lb battery module.

Without a recharging hookup this battery monitoring system will 'Brick' the car all by itself. Drain all the 18650's.
Current draw seems to be 0.42amps for this safety system.

Probably some nice vampire dc-dc converters to make 5volts
for the 12 microprocessors guaranteed to kill the $40,000 battery module.
 

uk_caver

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 9, 2007
Messages
1,408
Location
Central UK
So presumably the protection circuits are there partly in case of physical damage or thermal runaway of an individual cell when the car is not running, to disconnect internal shorts and try to prevent a chain reaction of failure?

Otherwise it would be possible to turn them off or hibernate them when the car didn't actually need the main battery, and power what few devices actually needed power from a small/cheap battery.
 

uk_caver

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 9, 2007
Messages
1,408
Location
Central UK
-- All 'Rare Earth' minerals come from China. This will not change in the next ten years. Rare Earth minerals are very important to schemes like this. Without Rare Earth minerals your iPod would weigh three pounds. Rare Earth minerals are not being exported by China the way they have been in the past. My point here is that if Westerners decide that they MUST drive electric cars they will, in fact be made in China.
I thought that with rare earths, part of the pont of the supply restriction/internalisation was to encourage other countries to start producing because China expected to be a net importer in the medium/long term.

The more confident people are that prices won''t suddenly drop and pull the rug from under a new venture, the sooner that alternative sources seem likely to get going.
 

Sub_Umbra

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
4,748
Location
la bonne vie en Amérique
I thought that with rare earths, part of the pont of the supply restriction/internalisation was to encourage other countries to start producing because China expected to be a net importer in the medium/long term.

The more confident people are that prices won''t suddenly drop and pull the rug from under a new venture, the sooner that alternative sources seem likely to get going.
It is my understanding that China reached the monopoly they have today by DUMPING Rare Earth minerals. (Dumping in this context would mean the export of said minerals internationally at below their cost of production in an attempt to shut all other mining operations down. It worked -- it will take a minimum of ten years to begin significant returns on mining operations of rare earth minerals begun today.)

"...All your electric cars are belong to us..."
 
Last edited:

Wrend

Enlightened
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
646
Location
United States, IL

How did this thread get here?

I think you need to crunch some actual numbers more and make generalized assumptions less.

Did you know that you could charge a battery powered electric car with a relatively cheap gas powered generator and still get better gas mileage and pollute less?

The beauty of "going electric" is that it can get its energy from anywhere, and that energy can be used a lot more efficiently.

The only real hindrance is the prohibitive cost of larger battery capacity.
 
Last edited:

uk_caver

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 9, 2007
Messages
1,408
Location
Central UK
It is my understanding that China reached the monopoly they have today by DUMPING Rare Earth minerals. (Dumping in this context would mean the export of said minerals internationally at below their cost of production in an attempt to shut all other mining operations down. It worked -- it will take a minimum of ten years to begin significant returns on mining operations of rare earth minerals begun today.)
Ten years to start meaningful production even in the face of demand and limited supply?
 

Sub_Umbra

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
4,748
Location
la bonne vie en Amérique
How did this thread get here?

I think you need to crunch some actual numbers more and make generalized assumptions less.

Did you know that you could charge a battery powered electric car with a relatively cheap gas powered generator and still get better gas mileage and pollute less?

The beauty of going electric is that it can get its energy from anywhere, and can be used a lot more efficiently.

The only real hindrance is the prohibitive cost of larger battery capacity.
I am not impressed. While you have responded you have not addressed even one single issue I brought up.

You are making my points for me by your lack of any arguments. Perhaps you who have attempted to bring me to task for making, as you said, "...genralized assumptions..." could take a minute and focus your thoughts. It might be handy for you to comment about things I have posted, instead of commenting on things I haven't ever written.
 
Top