ArmyTek        
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 74

Thread: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

  1. #1
    Flashaholic* candle lamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    1,575

    Arrow Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    The TK75 is high-output, 3xXM-L U2, 4x18650 flashlight from Fenix.





    The production version sent to me came in the nice plastic case. Included inside is the light, user manual, warranty card, two extra o-rings, lanyard.
    .
    .
    Manufacturer Specifications from user manual :



    Notice : The above mentioned parameters (lab-tested by Fenix using ARB-L2 18650 rechargeable Li-ion batteries) are approximate and may vary between flashlights, batteries, and environments.

    • Uses Cree XM-L (U2) LED with lifespan of 50,000 hours
    • Uses foure 18650 rechargeable Li-ion batteries
    • 185mm (Length) x 52.5mm (Diameter) x 87.5mm (Head)
    • 510-gram weight (excluding batteries)
    • Digitally regulated output - maintains constant brightness
    • Low-voltage warning function to alert users to replace the batteries
    • Reverse polarity protection guards against improper battery installation
    • Over-heat protection to avoid high-temperature of the surface
    • Dual button switch system in the front for quick switching
    • Made of durable aircraft-grade aluminum
    • Premium Type III hard-anodized anti-abrasive finish
    • Toughened ultra-clear glass lens with anti-reflective coating
    .
    .






    The hard (type III) anodizing is a matt black, with no chips or damage on my sample. There are identification labels on the head only. The lettering is clear and white gainst the background. The manufacturer, model name, and serial number are at the bottom of the head. The hot warning mark is just below the bezel ring.
    .
    .


    The light has mainly 3 parts (i.e. head, battery tube, and tailcap). There is a battery carrier in the tube.
    .
    .


    The light has a stainless steel scalloped bezel ring and a waterproof o-ring between the bezel ring and reflector. There are three thin and three thick cooling fins on the head. The head base of the light has a positive contact point to contact with the positive contact of the battery carrier. The wide negative contact rim surrounds the central positive contact.
    .
    .


    The light uses AR coating lens, and the purple hue is reflected on it.
    The TK75 has a large head and uses three cool white XM-L U2 emitters, each emitter is perfectly centered in their own deep and smooth reflector well. There are few very small bubbles around reflectors, but do not affect the beam quality in the real world. The wells overlap slightly, but each reflector is somewhat deep overall, so I would expect peripheral artifacts in the spill and the good throw of beam.
    .
    .


    The TK75 uses electronic switches in the head to control on-off and mode switching. These are conveniently located right below the cooling fins on the head. The right switch controls on-off, and the left controls mode selection and output levels within each mode.
    The switching travel is average like this kind of switch with average resistance, and provides audible click when engaged.
    .
    .


    The light uses a plastic battery carrier that holds 4x18650 cells which are arranged in 2S2P. It looks much sturdier and well-made than earlier models. The positive & negative contact point on the carrier are all springs.
    .
    .


    The positive contact plate is significantly raised, and the negative contact spring has good elasticity. So all types (i.e., true flat-tops, wide and small button-tops) of 18650's work fine. Longer cells may be somewhat tight, but all my protected high capacity (2600~3100mAh) cells fit. The battery carrier isn't reversible because it has positive and negative connection terminals on the one side only (i.e., the current is carried through the battery carrier). You should be careful to insert the 18650's into the battery carrier in the correct polarity.
    .
    .


    The positive contact point is very nicely fillet curved, so doesn't seem it may catch on the wrapper on the flat cells when removing them. There is haunched part outside the positive contact point will help to remove the batteries from the carrier.
    .
    .


    You can see the fully loaded battery carrier with unprotected & protected cells. I don't have any issue to insert my shortest & longest 18650 cells into the carrier. But note that the cells with longer & wider diameter will have little difficulty when inserting into or removing from the battery carrier. It introduces no rattle even when I shake the light laterally when it's fully loaded with 18650's unprotected in my sample. Note that only 4x18650 li-ion cells can be used in the light (i.e., it doesn't support multiple CR123A or RCR123A).
    .
    .


    Screw threads at the head & tail side are trapezoidal & square cut, and seems good quality. Both male & female threads on the head, battery tube, and tailcap are fully anodized, but it doesn't really matter since the current is carried though the battery carrier only. However lock-out is still possible if you unscrew the tailcap or head two full turns or more when not in use. They are smooth with no cross-threading or squeaking on my sample.
    .
    .


    The battery tube continues the cylindrical shape. The overall checkered pattern of the handle has many segments which also have a large number of tiny concentric ring ridges running along. This pattern gives a very good grip. Tube walls are as thick as most of the multi 18650 high-output lights I have reviewed.
    .
    .


    There are four couples of holes at the rear end of the tailcap for lanyard attachment.
    .
    .


    You can attach the lanyard came with the light as shown above. The light can tailstand with the lanyard attached stably.
    .
    .


    From left to right, VicLite 18650 protected, Blackshadow Terminator, Niteye EYE40, Fenix TK75, Xtar S1.
    .
    .


    The head size & body weight excluding battery of TK75 & S1 are as follows :
    TK75 - 87.9mm / 506g, S1 - 83.4mm / 877g
    .
    .


    The gripability is good. The build feels solid, and I find handling & balance of the light is good. Overall build quality is very high.
    .
    .
    Measured Dimensions & Weight


    .
    .
    User Interface

    There are two modes (i.e., general mode & flashing mode).
    On-off is controlled by the right switch and output mode switching is controlled by the left switch on the head.
    Cick the right switch to turn the light on-off. Click the left switch to advance through the output states.

    1) General mode
    The general (or constant) output mode is the default setting when you turn the light on. Press the left switch to cycle through Low –> Med. –> High –> Turbo output, in a repeating cycle. The light has output level memory, and remembers the last output level used when you turn the light off and back on, even after a battery change.

    2) Flashing mode
    The “hidden” Strobe, SOS are accessed by clicking and holding the side button switch for one second and three seconds respectively. A single press on the side switch will return to the memorized output level in general mode. The flashing mode has no memory.
    .
    .
    Standby Current Drain

    Due to the electronic side switches, the light has a small current when the battier carrier is loaded with cells and in contact to the head. I measured this current as 54.2μA with 4xVicLite 18650 (2600mAh) cells. Since the cells are arranged in 2S2P for 4x18650 cells, that would translate into around 10 years before the cells would be fully drained. If you want to break this current, store the light locked-out by loosening the head or tailcap or remove the carrier from the battery tube when not in use.
    .
    .
    PWM



    The light shows no sign of PWM at any output levels. I do think the light is actually current-controlled as claimed. I notice there is neither buzzing sound nor tint-shift at all output levels with the naked eye on my sample.
    .
    .
    Runtime



    Runtime performance is very good and flat regulation is evident on Turbo I tested. I could see the light dropped down to a very low output, instead of completely shutting off when the battery protection circuit was reached. The above runtime labelled as "Turbo-Accu." is an accumulated runtime for Turbo output. Regulation is maintained very nicely through Turbo mode on 4x18650 batteries.
    The TK75 steps down on Turbo to High after around 20 mins runtime. This is a timed drop-down considering the battery depletion, not a thermal sensor feature to avoid overheating the light. As with the other Fenix lights, the regulation pattern and runtime efficiency of the current controlled circuit seems excellent.

    The runtime accumulated Turbo output last on VicLite 18650 (2600mAh) is appr. 39 mins in my test. While it's appr. 67 mins on NLTEK18650 (3000mAh).
    The runtime for 10% output of accumulated Turbo on VicLite & NLTEK are appr. 146 mins & 84 mins in my test.

    * Note that the original cell of the NLTEK is LGABD11865 (3000mAh), and its maximum charging voltage is 4.35v for full capacity. But charged it 4.2v for runtime test, so the capacity is about 2700mAh reduced with about 300mAh.

    There are three distinct step-downs (i.e., Turbo to High, High to Med., Med. to Low) at the stage of battery depletion. I could see there was times flashing or blinking to indicate low voltage on low output level.

    [New 13.01.09]


    I've added runtime for non-accumulated Turbo output on NLTEK 18650 (3000mAh). The runtime for 10% output of non-accumulated Turbo on VicLite & NLTEK are appr. 196 mins & 198 mins respectively. The difference of the entire runtime between two 18650's is almost imperceptible, while the High output duration on NLTEK is longer than VicLite by 10 mins. [New 13.01.09]
    .
    .
    [New 13.01.08]
    Relative Output Comparison


    [New 13.01.08]
    .
    .
    Beamshot

    1. White door beamshot

    - ISO100, F/10.0, 1/200sec, Auto white balance


    .
    .
    - ISO100, F/10.0, 1/400sec, Auto white balance


    .
    .
    - ISO100, F/10.0, 1/640sec, Auto white balance


    .
    .
    - ISO100, F/10.0, 1/1000sec, Auto white balance


    .
    .
    2. Indoor beamshot (about 7m from the target)

    - ISO100, F/2.8, 1/8sec, Auto white balance



    - Control Shot
    .
    .


    - TK75 (XM-L U2)
    .
    .


    - S1 (XM-L U2)
    .
    .


    .
    .
    3. 55m Outdoor Beamshot

    - ISO100, F/2.8, 1sec, Auto white balance



    - Control Shot
    .
    .


    - TK75 (XM-L U2)
    .
    .


    - S1 (XM-L U2)
    .
    .


    .
    .
    4. 60~65m Outdoor Beamshot

    - ISO100, F/2.8, 1sec, Auto white balance



    - Control Shot
    .
    .


    - TK75 (XM-L U2)
    .
    .


    - S1 (XM-L U2)
    .
    .


    .
    .
    5. 140m Outdoor Beamshot
    - ISO100, F/2.8, 1sec, Auto white balance


    - Control Shot
    .
    .


    - TK75 (XM-L U2)
    .
    .


    - S1 (XM-L U2)
    .
    .


    .
    .
    6. 150m Outdoor Beamshot

    - ISO100, F/2.8, 1sec, Auto white balance


    - Control Shot
    .
    .


    - TK75 (XM-L U2)
    .
    .


    - S1 (XM-L U2)
    .
    .


    .
    .
    [New 13.02.14] Beamshot for TK75 & K40

    7. 55m Outdoor Beamshot

    - ISO100, F/2.8, 1sec, Auto white balance


    -Control Shot
    .
    .

    -K40
    .
    .

    - TK75
    .
    .

    .
    .
    8. 60~65m Outdoor Beamshot

    - ISO100, F/2.8, 1sec, Auto white balance


    - Control Shot
    .
    .

    - K40
    .
    .

    - TK75
    .
    .

    .
    .
    9. 140m Outdoor Beamshot
    - ISO100, F/2.8, 1sec, Auto white balance


    - Control Shot
    .
    .

    - K40
    .
    .

    - TK75
    .
    .

    .
    .
    10. 150m Outdoor Beamshot

    - ISO100, F/2.8, 1sec, Auto white balance


    - Control Shot
    .
    .

    - K40
    .
    .

    - TK75
    .
    .

    [New 13.02.14]
    .
    .

    • TK75 supplied by Fenix for review. Thanks!
    Last edited by candle lamp; 02-14-2013 at 04:16 AM. Reason: [New 13.02.14]

  2. #2
    *Flashaholic* kj2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    7,896

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Thanks -got the light myself, but have to read your review

  3. #3

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Thanks candle lamp

  4. #4
    Enlightened kolbasz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Szombathely, Hungary
    Posts
    74

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Your neighbours must be happy. You make daylight in the night!

    Thanks for the review candle lamp!
    I'm buying one next week. I'm so excited.
    It's a very good flashlight, i'm only worried about the led's greenish tint and the position.
    Hope mine will be perfect.

    I'm wondering how long can be a maximum runtime on the 4NLTEK with only 20 min. turbo mode?
    I'm just asking because i'm going to use mine with samsung 2800mAh.
    Last edited by kolbasz; 01-06-2013 at 01:44 PM.

  5. #5
    Enlightened eusty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    75

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Thanks for the comparison to the S1 as these are the two lights I'm looking at. The indoor show with the plants is especially useful, as although the TK75 has a brighter hotspot it also has more flood


    Still leaning to the TK.....
    LED Lenser: P3 (x2), P7 Fenix: TK35 Xtar: TZ20 (x2) Nitecore: SENS CR Thrunite: Ti, TN30

  6. #6
    Flashaholic RCTPAVUK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    139

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    So, they DO have quality made flashlights...
    To bad i saw the line : "TK75 supplied by Fenix for review."
    Others though have some pits on the reflector and non-centered leds... Take mine... SN f4udar00726

  7. #7
    Flashaholic* Bwolcott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    564

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    looks like the tk75 blows away the s1
    Asilaydying1984 ON YOUTUBE

  8. #8

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Nice review candle lamp. Very clear, good write-up and pics.

    Impressive to see that they could get such good throw for 3x emitters in such a (relatively) small head. Looks like a much better carrier than the earlier lights too.

    Cheers!
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. New: Selfbuilt's Summer Sale!
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  9. #9
    Flashaholic* candle lamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    1,575

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Thanks all of you including kj2 & gopajti!

    Quote Originally Posted by eusty View Post
    Thanks for the comparison to the S1 as these are the two lights I'm looking at. The indoor show with the plants is especially useful, as although the TK75 has a brighter hotspot it also has more flood
    Exactly! TK75 has a brighter hotspot & floodier spill at close range. At long range, it's definitely thrower.

    Quote Originally Posted by RCTPAVUK View Post
    So, they DO have quality made flashlights...
    To bad i saw the line : "TK75 supplied by Fenix for review."
    Others though have some pits on the reflector and non-centered leds... Take mine... SN f4udar00726
    That's too bad. Although my sample has a some tiny bubbles on the reflector, it doesn't affect the beam quality. But if non-centered emitters have bad effects on the beam profile or quality, I would like to advise you to contact your dealer ASAP.

    Quote Originally Posted by selfbuilt View Post
    Nice review candle lamp. Very clear, good write-up and pics.

    Impressive to see that they could get such good throw for 3x emitters in such a (relatively) small head. Looks like a much better carrier than the earlier lights too.

    Cheers!
    Thanks Eric! In fact, at first glance I thought TK75 can't be such a good thrower, due to relatively shallow reflectors, my prediction was not on target.
    Moreover, it has a bright hotspot & wide spill at close range (~15 meters).

    Quote Originally Posted by kolbasz View Post
    Your neighbours must be happy. You make daylight in the night!

    Thanks for the review candle lamp!
    I'm buying one next week. I'm so excited.
    It's a very good flashlight, i'm only worried about the led's greenish tint and the position.
    Hope mine will be perfect.

    I'm wondering how long can be a maximum runtime on the 4NLTEK with only 20 min. turbo mode?
    I'm just asking because i'm going to use mine with samsung 2800mAh.
    My sample shows very slight greenish tint on hotspot at a short distance (~1m).

    The TK75 steps down on Turbo to High after 20 mins runtime. This is a timed drop-down. If you want to run more than 20 mins on turbo output level, just click the left switch. Then the turbo will be maintained until the battery is depleted. So turbo output level's runtime depend on the battery capacity & usage count. My 4xNLTEK were charged by 4.19~4.2V for runtime test and their capacity were appr. 2700mAh with that voltage.
    I think Samsung 2800mAh will have good performance as well.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bwolcott View Post
    looks like the tk75 blows away the s1
    Yes, TK75's hotspot is brighter.


    P.S. : Relative output comparison updated!

    Relative Output Comparison

    Last edited by candle lamp; 01-08-2013 at 04:24 AM. Reason: Relative output comparison

  10. #10

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Thank you for the review; well done! I only have 2600 mAh batteries, so maybe sometime I'll have to get some higher-capacity ones down the road for my TK75.

  11. #11
    *Flashaholic* Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    10,294

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    An awesome and thorough review candle lamp! I was fortunate to get one on the day they started shipping and it's been difficult to explain just how we'll this thing throws for a triple. You've captured it perfectly in your beamshots though. Thanks for the great review and all of your hard work.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Thank You very much for the review. I will be buying the TK75 now because of this review.

  13. #13
    Flashaholic* BLUE LED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,897

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Quote Originally Posted by Bwolcott View Post
    looks like the tk75 blows away the s1
    I too expected that the Xtar S1 would be a slightly better thrower than the Fenix TK75 and that the TK75 would be higher output.

    My TK75 blows away my Xtar S1 in both Lux and Lumens and feels more comfortable. I really do like the more lighter and compact size of the TK75.

    Fenix TK75 103k Lux
    Xtar S1 Production, 66k Lux

    I would like to see a similar lock-out system to the Olight SR series. I find the lock-out on the TK75 to be a little clumsy, as it takes too many turns to lock this light out properly.

  14. #14
    Flashaholic* candle lamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    1,575

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Thanks and glad you're enjoying the review.

    Quote Originally Posted by blah9 View Post
    Thank you for the review; well done! I only have 2600 mAh batteries, so maybe sometime I'll have to get some higher-capacity ones down the road for my TK75.
    I think it's good idea. Please refer to HKJ's excellent 18650 tests for your reference.

    Quote Originally Posted by Patriot View Post
    An awesome and thorough review candle lamp! I was fortunate to get one on the day they started shipping and it's been difficult to explain just how we'll this thing throws for a triple. You've captured it perfectly in your beamshots though. Thanks for the great review and all of your hard work.
    It's my pleasure. Patriot!

    Quote Originally Posted by Gauntlet3D View Post
    Thank You very much for the review. I will be buying the TK75 now because of this review.
    Hope you like it. And Gauntlet3D!

  15. #15
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    1,163

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Shooting the beam over the other's flat, would the residents complaint about it

  16. #16
    Flashaholic* candle lamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    1,575

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Quote Originally Posted by jh333233 View Post
    Shooting the beam over the other's flat, would the residents complaint about it
    Fortunately not. I usually shine the beam while they are deeply asleep. Or they will notify the maintenance office, or they do secretly enjoy my beamshot.


    P.S. : Runtime graph for non-accumulated Turbo on NLTEK 18650 updated!



    I've added runtime for non-accumulated Turbo output on NLTEK 18650 (3000mAh). The runtime for 10% output of non-accumulated Turbo on VicLite & NLTEK are appr. 196 mins & 198 mins respectively. The difference of the entire runtime between two 18650's is almost imperceptible, while the High output duration on NLTEK is longer than VicLite by 10 mins.

  17. #17
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    WA, USA
    Posts
    663

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    I'm disappointed by two things:

    A) I wanted more flood/spill.
    B) I don't like the UI. I was hoping the buttons meant up/down. I'm looking for lights that get me to my mode quickly, intuitively, and go in the direction I want to go. For example, if I'm on medium and want to go to low, I don't want to go through high to get there; I'd want to go in reverse.

    For this many batteries, these kind of lights should have a built in charger for both recharge and maintenance charging.

    Jake
    Wish: 1) Super low beacon; easy find flashlight. 2) Low voltage indicator, so not stranded without light. 3) Simple, one handed control ring mode changer (magnetic control ring). 4) Flood beam for walking/tasks. 5) Pocket carry. 6) LiFePO4.


  18. #18

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Quote Originally Posted by snakyjake View Post
    B) I don't like the UI. I was hoping the buttons meant up/down. I'm looking for lights that get me to my mode quickly, intuitively, and go in the direction I want to go. For example, if I'm on medium and want to go to low, I don't want to go through high to get there; I'd want to go in reverse.
    I was using my TK45 last night and thinking the same thing. It's amazing that other companies (Zebralight, and others I'm sure) have come up with a better UI with only one switch. Fenix should be able to do much better with two switches. There's no reason to have to keep cycling through all of the modes to get what you want.

  19. #19

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Thanks.
    Runtime on continuous turbo mode with Fenix 2600mA about 64 minute.

  20. #20
    Flashaholic* candle lamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    1,575

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Quote Originally Posted by dongkoo View Post
    Thanks.
    Runtime on continuous turbo mode with Fenix 2600mA about 64 minute.
    Thanks for sharing the information. dongkoo!

  21. #21
    Flashaholic* Bwolcott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    564

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Quote Originally Posted by dongkoo View Post
    Thanks.
    Runtime on continuous turbo mode with Fenix 2600mA about 64 minute.

    I thought turbo steps down after 20 minutes?
    Asilaydying1984 ON YOUTUBE

  22. #22
    Flashaholic* candle lamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    1,575

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Quote Originally Posted by Bwolcott View Post
    I thought turbo steps down after 20 minutes?
    Yes, that's right. The light will downshifts to High after 20mins in Turbo. If the turbo is needed continuously, just click the side switch again. I think the above runtime he mentioned is an accumulated time when using Fenix 4x18650 (2600mAh).


  23. #23
    Flashaholic* Overclocker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,585

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    no thermal step-down. that's WEAK. nitecore TM15 steps down only when too hot but otherwise keeps cranking out the lumens at full power if you could keep it cool. i could think of a million reasons why you'd want sustained MAX output. so please...

  24. #24

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    I thought turbo steps down after 20 minutes?
    Yes, I press to turbo mode every 20 minutes.

  25. #25
    Flashaholic RCTPAVUK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    139

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Quote Originally Posted by Overclocker View Post
    no thermal step-down. that's WEAK. nitecore TM15 steps down only when too hot but otherwise keeps cranking out the lumens at full power if you could keep it cool. i could think of a million reasons why you'd want sustained MAX output. so please...
    I've read somewhere that Fenix tested 75th with constant turbo for a long period of time... It wasn't damaged after, and it won't be after using it all way through in turbo. I believe that 1 set of batteries won't last more than 1.5 hours...
    You can find some reviews where people were measuring its temperature, and it wasn't getting higher after 18-20 min of turbo... So i can say that 20 min of constant isn't critical, and the flashlight has a good cooling system and size to work not only on 1 set but 2 and i'd say 3 sets of batteries...

    For more, you always can measure the temperature by yourself to know where to stop...

    Tk75 has relatively good electronic step-down system for light intensity, which Nitecore doesn't.

    I can't say that it would be better to have a temperature-step-down function for tk75, but in this way it isn't critical...

  26. #26
    Flashaholic* Overclocker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,585

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Quote Originally Posted by RCTPAVUK View Post
    I've read somewhere that Fenix tested 75th with constant turbo for a long period of time... It wasn't damaged after, and it won't be after using it all way through in turbo. I believe that 1 set of batteries won't last more than 1.5 hours...
    You can find some reviews where people were measuring its temperature, and it wasn't getting higher after 18-20 min of turbo... So i can say that 20 min of constant isn't critical, and the flashlight has a good cooling system and size to work not only on 1 set but 2 and i'd say 3 sets of batteries...

    For more, you always can measure the temperature by yourself to know where to stop...

    Tk75 has relatively good electronic step-down system for light intensity, which Nitecore doesn't.

    I can't say that it would be better to have a temperature-step-down function for tk75, but in this way it isn't critical...

    LOL. of course thermal-stepdown is better jeez... if i wanted lower output then i'd select lower output. i have a friend who mounts a tiny monster TM15 on his boat. full output coz the wind keeps it cool

    as i've said there are a million reasons why you DO NOT WANT a timer stepdown

  27. #27
    Flashaholic*
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    1,163

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    This is a damn beast... Compared with T60CS
    Tri-XML with 92k lux@1m
    I hope that Fenix will eventually change their battery mags into a stiffer one like "Sunnyman" does, plastic carrier doesn't feel so secure and doesn't "rhymes" with med-priced light

    More fuel and throw in the exchange of compactness, sounds fair enough.
    Finally i hope Fenix would do a better surface treatment like "Sunny man", now one has no difference from DX-junk, srsly eww after buying so many Sunnyman lights

  28. #28

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Candle Lamp,

    Thank you for a very informative review. I bought two TK75's, one of them as a gift. Both were flawless in terms of LED centering, beam and function. The TK75 is an outstanding light but I have two critical points to make. One, and most important is that the light is too easily accidentally activated. I solved this by using stick-on Velcro to build a raised surround which protected the switch while retaining functionality. IMO, Fenix should have built in similar protection.

    My second point is that the TK75 could have been made noticeably shorter and narrower (and lighter) with no trade-off of any kind if Fenix had used an integrated battery holder a la Nitecore TM11 & TM15. This may have been obviated by the need to accommodate body extensions, though I believe Fenix could have figured out a way to build integrated battery holders into the extensions.

    This isn't as important in the small single body TK75, but with even one extension I found the light to be quite bulky.

    Despite these points, I love my TK75 and have even found a great holster for it. I slightly modified a Thrunite TN31 holster by cutting it down very slightly and sealing the nylon edges with a match flame. Aside from having to own a TN31, I'd like to hear if any other TK75 owners have found a holster solution.

    Brightnorm

  29. #29
    Flashaholic* candle lamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    1,575

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Quote Originally Posted by brightnorm View Post
    One, and most important is that the light is too easily accidentally activated. I solved this by using stick-on Velcro to build a raised surround which protected the switch while retaining functionality. IMO, Fenix should have built in similar protection.
    I think it's likely that the light is accidently activated, due to the protruded electronic switch. To make a slightly raised surround just around the switch is very nice idea. An alternative way would be to use the switch similar to PD series.

    Quote Originally Posted by brightnorm View Post
    My second point is that the TK75 could have been made noticeably shorter and narrower (and lighter) with no trade-off of any kind if Fenix had used an integrated battery holder a la Nitecore TM11 & TM15. This may have been obviated by the need to accommodate body extensions, though I believe Fenix could have figured out a way to build integrated battery holders into the extensions.
    In my view, I guess it's not easy to use the integrated batteries holder similar to those lights (i.e., TM11 & TM15) by both employing the body extension and keeping the same batteries arrangement (2S2P). However I expect they will be able to do that.
    Thanks a lot for your detailed feedback. Brightnorm!

  30. #30

    Default Re: Fenix TK75 [3xXM-L U2, 4x18650] Review

    Too bad there seems to be relatively little interest in this truly unique (at the present) light.

    Brightnorm,

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •