Okay, I haven't had much time to work on this, but I've come to some interesting discoveries. First, the 3 led lights don't produce enough to keep me happy. 5 led puck lights, much better.
Second, unrestricted they draw WAY too much power. But a nice 10olm resistor seems to reign that in nicely. I got from 225ma unrestricted to a comfortable 100ma at 2v, which kinda surprised me given that I'm feeding them 4.5v, so I figure that has something to do with the natural resistance of the LED's. As far as the voltage, that didn't change between resister and open circuit. At least not enough to detect. So basically my rig is either a single or double 5led puck (depending on the size of the room I want to light), a single 10olm resistor, a three cell D-battery pack providing 4.5v and a home light switch like you'd use for track lighting. Why the switch you ask? lol. Wall mounting light flicking convenience.
Just mount on the wall and use just like a regular room light. I'm designing this whole thing more for easily mountable and removable emergency convenience lighting when the power goes out, which it has a habit of doing quite often around here. Lights go out, click, click, click, and you have ready to go battery powered room lighting that gives you a degree of normalcy while mains power is out. The reason for the D cells is actually pretty simple. It comes from Peukert's law. The more juice you draw vs overall capacity, the faster your battery dies. As such I've found a D provides longer life per amp hour of capacity draining at 100ma than a C, which provides more than a AA, and so on. I'm not talking overall capacity, but rather available at a particular draw rate vs its manufacturer rating. Of course, I'm preaching to the choir with this as you all likely understand this pretty well, but I figured to explain myself at least a little. Also, I found a neat way to get your LED pucks to spread their light out more efficiently across the room instead of projecting a concentrated beam at a single location. Just put a couple layers of Elmer's Glue-All, aka "White Glue", over the lens and it then defuses the light out really nicely for very little intensity loss. Anyhow, I thought I'd update everyone on how it's going. Yeah, it's a hillbilly hack, and it probably will look ugly in the end, but my thought is this. Do you want it to look really nice and be clunky, or do you want normalcy inducing easy to use lighting? I'm shooting for option 2. If I can do both at some point, great. But for now I'm good with just "it works".
PS, I'm just stumped why this forum software won't parse my line feeds in my posts and just lumps my text in big blocks. o_0