Kurt, apropos of what you said, for a given internal resistance, is the dV/dt termination easier to detect with greater or lesser charging currents? Or does it matter?
Well, since you ask me specifically... ;-)
generally, the dV/dt termination is easier to detect with greater charging currents. Here's why...
At the end of the charging, when the battery is full, the excess energy starts to get converted to heat, so the battery heats up. First the voltages rises relatively sharply because not being able to take suplus charge results in a higher resistance to charging. However, because the battery heats up, the internal resistance decreases as a function of temperature (as it always does, not only while charging and no matter if the heat is generated by the battery itself or not). Since the internal resistance determines how much the voltage raises on top of the no-load voltage, that voltage raise and thus the overall voltage decreases. But since the cell takes some time to heat up, the voltage reaches a peak when the cell isn't at full temperature yet and then drops. Eventually, if charging isn't stopped, the cell will have reached full temperature, and the voltage will stay at a certain level.
Now if you apply a very low charging current, the cell won't heat up that much, thus the decrease of its internal resistance by heating up and with it the voltage drop from the peak won't be as pronounced, to the point where it's barely noticeable.
Some examples:
I've charged some LSD D cells with 8 Ah at a charging rate of 500 mA (which is the one I always use for those cells)... in this case the voltage peaks at 1.45 and then returns to 1.443 in the course of about an hour, and won't drop much more than that. (I only use a dumb charger for these cells... it's so dumb it doesn't know it's actually being used as a charger ;-)
Then I charged some older Uniross cells with 1500 mAh at a charging rate of 110 mA (which one of my dumb chargers applies). One cell peaked at 1.449 V and never got down from there. This happened again with two of those cells charging at a much lower charging rate. This is actually the trickle charge applied by my (fairly) smart charger after it calls the cells full. I left them in the charger because I suspected it ended the charge before the cells were actually full. One indication for this was that the cells after being shut down dropped to about 1.4 volts very quickly while still being trickle-charged (the actual end voltage was about 1.5 V). Well, I left them in the charger for several hours and tracked the voltage by hand. The voltage of both cells started out at about 1.38 V some minutes after the trickle charge began and then showed an actually fairly normal charging curve including an accelerated voltage rise near the end (about 10-12 hours later). However, eventually (at 1.45-1.46 volts) the voltage rise started to slow down again, and the voltage went towards a plateau. I actually left the cells in for a full day before taking them out, at which point they had reached 1.516 and 1.485 Volts, but in that curve, the voltage never dropped, and the cells were only a bit warm from the trickle charge. With that low charging current, of course it wouldn't have been possible to detect a dropping of the voltage.
I've also noticed that cells with a very high internal resistance (I have some with 1-2 Ohms each, though I have trouble finding an application they're still useable for) already heat up from the normal charging current before they're full... at least if you try to blast 1 amp into them. In this case, the voltage already drops at the start of the charge from the cells heating up, which might confuse the charger. Another thing that might happen is that the internal resistance is so high that the charging voltage exceeds the range of the charger's built-in meter or software and thus it's unable to detect if a voltage drop occurred (which is probably why the Maha charger displays "HI" beyond a certain voltage point). What adds to this is that some chargers will apply a lower charging current if the voltage is high, which will annihilate some part of the voltage curve as well.
So this is why it's harder to detect a voltage drop at a lower charging current. On the other hand it's probably hurting the cells more if they get charged, and especially overcharged, with a higher current. So maybe it would be better to use a different method of detecting when the cells are full which isn't dependent on a voltage drop, such as inflection, so that a lower charging current can safely be used while still correctly terminating the charge.