RofisLight        
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 57

Thread: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

  1. #1

    Thumbs up Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Reviewer's Note: Due to a large backlog of lights that I have to test, I will limit some of the descriptive text in my reviews for the time being. Full commentaries are still provided under the Potential Issues and the Preliminary Discussion sections, but I will let the pictures and graphs speak more themselves in the body of the review.





    The K60 is the latest light from AceBeam, featuring the high-output Cree XHP70 emitter. Let's see how it compares to the earlier AceBeam/SupBeam lights, and other competing high-output lights.

    Acebeam Reported Specifications:
    Note: as usual, this is just what the manufacturer provides. Scroll down to see my actual testing results.

    • LED: Cree XHP70 LED
    • Max 5000lumens output using (4x 18650 power cell)
    • Output (select by magnetic ring): Level 1 : 1lm 1300hours; Level 2 : 50lm 60 hours; Level 3 : 700lm 8 hours; Level 4 : 1700lm 3 hours; Level 5 : 3400lm 1.5hours; Level 6 : 5000lm 1 hours; Standby : 65uA Strobe : 5000lm 3 hours;
    • Working voltage: 4V - 17V;
    • Max Runtime: 1300 hours;
    • Max beam distance: 704meters;
    • Peak beam intensity: 124100cd;
    • Impact resistant: 1.2 meters;
    • Waterproof : IPX-8 Standard (2meters);
    • Size: 206mm(length) x 88mm(head diameter)*50mm(tube diameter);
    • Weight: 570g(without batteries);
    • Aircraft grade aluminum body structure;
    • Premium type III hard anodized anti-abrasive finish.
    • ultra-clear tempered glass lens with anti-reflective coating.
    • momentary forward click tactical switch.
    • Strobe mode for tactical and emergency use.
    • Light orange peel reflector for both smoothing out the beam and max. beam distance.
    • tactical knurling for firm grip
    • streamlined body design
    • Mechanical reversed polarity protection design for battery carrier
    • Intelligent highly effcient circuit board design for max performance and long run time;
    • Specially designed for military,Law Enforcement, Self-defense, Hunting,Search&Rescue and outdoor activities.
    • Intelligent temperature controlled light output for user safety
    • Accessories include: 1x user manual; 1x lanyard; 1x holster; 1x Replacement O - ring and Tailcap gummi;
    • MSRP: ~$190




    The K60 comes in the standard plain cardboard box with packing foam. Along with the light is a holster, extra o-rings, spare boot switch cover, decent quality wrist strap, warranty card, manual.




    From left to right: Keeppower protected 18650 3100mAh; Acebeam K60; Supbeam K50; Acebeam K40M; Thrunite TN35.

    All dimensions are directly measured, and given with no batteries installed:

    Acebeam K60: Weight: 593.2g, Length: 207mm, Width (bezel): 88.0mm
    AceBeam K40M: Weight: 498.4g, Length: 188mm, Width (bezel): 76.2mm
    SupBeam K50: Weight: 645.0g, Length: 230mm, Width (bezel): 90.1mm
    Crelant 7G10: Weight 643.4g (827g with 4x18650), Length: 198mm, Width (bezel): 79.0mm
    Eagletac MX25L3C 3x18650: Weight: 345.9g, 352.0g with kit tailcap (485-491g with 4x18650), Length: 141.9mm, 143.6mm with kit tailcap, Width (bezel): 61.9mm
    Fenix TK61: Weight: 605.7g (790g with 4x18650), Length: 218mm, Width (bezel): 96.0mm
    Fenix TK75: Weight: 516.0g (700g with 4x18650), Length: 184mm, Width (bezel): 87.5mm
    Niwalker BK-FA02: Weight: 687.6g (870g with 4x18650), Length: 209mm, Width (bezel): 80.0mm, Width (tailcap): 50.3mm
    Olight SR52: Weight: 396.7g (497g with 6xCR123A), Length: 162mm, Width (bezel): 63.1mm
    Thrunite TN35 (MT-G2): Weight: 571.4g (723g with 3x18650), Length: 201mm, Width (bezel): 78.9mm







    The K60 is similar to the K40M reviewed previously, with revised styling for a more "rakish" look. I believe you have a choice of anodizing colors, but mine came in flat black. Anodizing seems to be in very good shape on my sample. Labels are sharp and clear, and include a serial number.

    Rather than traditional knurling, the handle has a checkered pattern. Combined with the extra ridge detail on the control ring and head, overall grip is pretty good. The light can roll fairly easily, although there are cut-outs to help limit that somewhat.

    The control ring feels and looks like the earlier AceBeam lights. All black, there are slight indents on the control ring to help with feel. There is a label mark on the control ring that lines up with the labels on the head. The six constant output modes are not individually labeled, but there is a graded output bar pictogram over the first four levels (i.e., shows the direction to turn to raise or lower the output). There are firm detents at each level, with a slight click as you enter into each one.

    Screw threads are traditional triangular cut, but seem of good quality. They are anodized, but it is the tension on the spring in the head than determines if you can lock out the light by a twist. On my sample, a quick turn is enough to lock out the light.

    The lights can tailstand. Tailcap has cut-outs to facilitate access to the switch. Switch is a forward clicky switch (i.e., press for momentary, click for locked-on).

    Let's take a closer look at the battery carrier and bundled 18650 cells:








    The positive contact points inside the carrier are slightly raised, so all types of 18650 cells should work fine (i.e., true flat-tops, wide and small button-tops). There seems to be plenty of room in the carrier for length, so longer cells should fit fine. All the cells point the same way here (i.e., negative terminals at the base, positive terminals toward the head).

    A nice touch is that the light came with the batteries locked out by use of small adhesive stickers on the carrier springs (need to remove them to use the light).

    The batteries are labelled as high-drain IMR 18650, 2500mAh capacity and 20A rated. I recommend you stick with the IMR cells when running level 5 or 6. Note that these batteries don't come with protection circuits, so you will need to make sure you do not over-discharge the cells by running the light down.





    The large XHP70 emitter die shows four quadrants, with very little overhang of the emitter base (i.e., relatively small dome, just covering the die). This should translate into reasonable throw for the size and output. Reflector has fairly heavy texturing (orange peel finish). There is a clear anti-glare coating on the lens.

    Scroll down for beamshots.

    User Interface

    Turn the light off/on by the tailcap clicky – press for momentary, press and release (i.e., click) for constant on.

    Change output modes by turning the control ring in the head. Arranged from left-to-right (looking down at the light, held in traditional flashlight carry), the modes are level 1 > level 2 > level 3 > level 4 > level 5 > level 6 (max) > standby > tactical strobe.

    No light is produced on standby, but a miniscule current will be drawn to allow the circuit to respond to a ring turn (see below). As always, I recommend you store the light clicked-off at the tailcap, or locked-out by a head twist.

    Video:

    For more information on the light, please see my brief overview here:



    As with all my videos, I recommend you have annotations turned on. I commonly update the commentary with additional information or clarifications before publicly releasing the video.

    Strobe

    There is no sign of PWM on any level – the light is current-controlled.



    The K60 uses an oscillating strobe design, switching between two frequencies every ~0.7secs or so. Here is a blow up of the two frequencies:




    As you can see, it rapidly switches between 14Hz and 7Hz. This is very similar to the K40M that I previously tested.

    Standby Drain

    There must be a standby drain when the clicky switch is turned on and the light is in standby position of the control ring. I measured this traditional standby current as 85uA on 4x18650. This is similar to my K50, and not a major concern. Given the in-series arrangement, that would take over 3.3 years to fully drain the bundled 2500mAh cells.

    Note that on other lights that use a similar design (e.g., Thrunite TN3x series), I know there is an additional circuit to assist the switch when high current draw is required. This necessitates a secondary circuit in the tailcap that has its own standby drain when connected to the carrier. Typically, these are in the uA range and not a concern in practice (although it would be additive to the carrier drain below when fully connected).

    Beamshots:

    And now, what you have all been waiting for. All lights are on their respective 18650 battery sources, about ~0.75 meter from a white wall (with the camera ~1.25 meters back from the wall). Automatic white balance, except for the MT-G2 (daylight white balance, to better compare tint).













    For outdoor shots, these are done in the style of my earlier 100-yard round-up review. Please see that thread for a discussion of the topography (i.e. the road dips in the distance, to better show you the corona in the mid-ground). Note there are a lot of bugs out at this time of year, so expect to see some flight trails. And I accidentally left the camera on auto white balance, so the MT-G2 looks unnaturally cool in these outdoor shots.

    The Nitecore TM16 (4xXM-L2) and Lumintop SD75 (1xXHP70) will be examined in upcoming reviews. Please see my review catalog at flashlightreviews.ca for the AceBeam K40M, Eagletac ZP10L9 and Niwalker MM18.









    Scroll down for direct beam measurements.

    Testing Method:

    All my output numbers are relative for my home-made light box setup, as described on my flashlightreviews.ca website. You can directly compare all my relative output values from different reviews - i.e. an output value of "10" in one graph is the same as "10" in another. All runtimes are done under a cooling fan, except for any extended run Lo/Min modes (i.e. >12 hours) which are done without cooling.

    I have devised a method for converting my lightbox relative output values (ROV) to estimated Lumens. See my How to convert Selfbuilt's Lightbox values to Lumens thread for more info.

    Throw/Output Summary Chart:

    My summary tables are reported in a manner consistent with the ANSI FL-1 standard for flashlight testing. Please see http://www.flashlightreviews.ca/FL1.htm for a discussion, and a description of all the terms used in these tables. Effective July 2012, I have updated all my Peak Intensity/Beam Distance measures with a NIST-certified Extech EA31 lightmeter (orange highlights).





    The K60 certainly lives up to its published specs – and exceeds them for throw on my sample.

    Output/Runtime Comparison:

    I currently do all my runtime testing on Panasonic NCR18650A (3100mAh) based protected ICR cells. In this case, I have used the bundled AceBeam 2500mAh IMR 20A cells for L5 and L6 testing.




    As you can see, there is a timed step-down on the highest level. And I'm glad to see the low battery warning, given the use of unprotected cells here.

    Potential Issues

    As with all lights that share this design, there is a stand-by current when in the "Stand By" mode of the control ring. But this current is very low (85uA), and will not be problem for regular use. And you can easily break this current by clicking the tailswitch off, or loosening the head a quarter turn.

    Only 18650 Li-ion cells may be used in the light (i.e., doesn't support multiple CR123A primary cells). Use of high-drain IMR cells is recommended for the highest levels (i.e., L5 and L6). Note that IMR cells are all unprotected, so you will have to make sure you do not let the light run down and damage the cells.

    Preliminary Observations

    The K60 is another solid light from Acebeam. I have a couple of XHP70 lights on my desk in testing right now, and all show the promise of this new emitter for high output (and potentially throw, when coupled to a large reflector). Part of Cree's Extreme High Power (XHP) class, the XHP70 apparently delivers twice the output of the MK-R, with similar lumens/watt - and without increasing the overall package footprint. Please see the Cree XHP70 datasheet for more info.

    Working from the previous K40/K50-series build, styling is updated somewhat on the K60 – but the light otherwise feels very similar to its predecessors. Personally, I've always been a fan of the Acebeam/SupBeam builds. The user interface is clear and uncluttered, with a good ring feel. The ring has clear and firm detents, and the output levels are well spaced. The battery carrier is of solid construction, and works well. And the presence of an actual clicky switch is always welcomed, to cut any unnecessary standby drain. Note that as with the K40 series, there is no in-light charging feature on the K60.

    The K60 shows excellent output/runtime efficiency and regulation (i.e., very flat). You can really see the efficiency advantage of the XHP70 compared to the MT-G2, XM-L2 or SST-90 emitters in the runtimes above.

    You also get a very "traditional" flashlight beam pattern here, with strong throw and good spill – but with incredibly high output overall. And all that without multi-emitter artifacts, thanks to the large and well-focused reflector and single emitter. So far, I'm impressed with what the XHP70 can do - this XHP class has a lot of potential for heavy-duty flashlights.

    For those looking for very good throw and super high output, the K60 is definitely a strong option to consider. Beam pattern, user interface, output/runtime efficiency and regulation were all excellent in my testing.

    ----

    K60 provided by AceBeam for review.
    Last edited by selfbuilt; 08-10-2015 at 01:56 PM.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  2. #2
    Flashaholic* Severus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    FL USA
    Posts
    586

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    nice graffiti on the road, it seems somebody is trolling you.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Thanks! I was looking forward to this one and also look forward to the TM16. I was torn between the two but went with the TM16 mainly due to the side switch.

    I'm sure it's the camera, but seems strange the warmer K40M appears cool, and the cool K60/TM16 appear warm.

    Haha "Stand by" I thought they fixed that. Better than "Stand. By." I guess
    GOOD TINT!

  4. #4
    ven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Manchester UK
    Posts
    17,399

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Thanks for the excellent review,cant wait for my k60vn version , its a tough choice right now(for me anyway) with all these great lights but glad i have chosen the k60

    Well spotted Severus,i had to go back and see what you meant!! Guess it pretty much describes the "troll"


  5. #5

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Quote Originally Posted by Severus View Post
    nice graffiti on the road, it seems somebody is trolling you.
    Yeah, I suspect that wasn't for me specifically. Around the bend on that road is a popular hangout for teenagers late at night - I've come across a few on my excursions. I'm guessing one of them was exploring his sense of self-expression, LOL.

    Quote Originally Posted by markr6 View Post
    I'm sure it's the camera, but seems strange the warmer K40M appears cool, and the cool K60/TM16 appear warm.
    Ah yes, forgot to mention it, but I had the camera on automatic white balance for those outdoor shots. The white wall beam shots show better what to expect, since the MT-G2 was locked on daylight.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Quote Originally Posted by ven View Post
    Well spotted Severus,i had to go back and see what you meant!! Guess it pretty much describes the "troll"
    LOL!!!!! I missed that. Coincidence, or someone had enough time to locate this road in person? Beat me to it about the teenager comment! Nice quiet place to do, whatever.
    GOOD TINT!

  7. #7

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Use of high-drain IMR cells is recommended for the highest levels (i.e., L5 and L6).
    Hello there. Would you be able to quickly explain this? What benefits do IMR batteries have over protected batteries when it comes to level 5 and 6?

  8. #8

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Thanks SB for another outstanding review. All my big lights are now outdated. They are 2-3 yrs. old. Technology keeps going.

  9. #9
    Flashaholic
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Southern Germany
    Posts
    113

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Quote Originally Posted by Summer Heat View Post
    Hello there. Would you be able to quickly explain this? What benefits do IMR batteries have over protected batteries when it comes to level 5 and 6?
    I second that question.
    Current draw ist max 4.5A on level 6.

    I made runtime measurements with Samsung 30Q, 35E, LG MJ1 and Soshine protected 3400mAh (NCR 18650 BF) on levels 5 and 6.
    Best runtime on level 6 until battery warning was with LG MJ1, followed by SDI 35E, 30Q, protected NCR BL.
    On level 5 it was MJ1/35E (identical), protected NCR BL, 30Q.
    So there's no need for trading in capacity for high-current capability.
    I think among currently available cells the NCR18650GA would achieve max runtime in all modes, but I don't have 4 of them to verify this.

  10. #10
    Flashaholic* Tac Gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Kentucky Bluegrass Region and/or Lake Cumberland area
    Posts
    1,497

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    I'm so ready to be out of college and can afford these new 4000+ lumen lights but in another year these will be old school and be as numerous as 1000 lumen lights are now and not special anymore.
    ​Fenix: CL25R, E21, HL35, LD12 2017, TK41, TK45, UC02. Eagletac: D25A2 (x2). Elzetta: Bravo w/ AVS head. Coast: HP14. Olight: H1R Nova. Solarforce L2 w/ XHP50

  11. #11

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Thanks for the review,will check out this Acebeam flashlight soon.Love selfbuilt's review and pictures,they are really great.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Thanks for your very informative review of this standout light. I have been thinking about adding this item to my collection. I have plenty of small lights, and I have a sufficient quantity of popcan flooders, for now.

    I am looking for something with both throw and power, and it looks like this is it. Single, powerful emitter combined with a large reflector would fill a hole in my collection.
    Acebeam K70vn, EC50vn, two X65Vn. Eagletac SX25L3 MT-G2, MX25L4CvnT XP-L. Fenix TK75vnQ70 dome on. 47's MMU-X3. Manker MK34Vn. Niwalker MM15, and MM15MBvnSpec1. Nitecore: TM06Svn 4 x XHP50.2. Noctigon Meteor M43vn XP-L dd. Olight S2 Baton. P60vn Quad XP-L HD 2 cell host Cryos Cu head. Thrunite TN36UTvn, TN42vn.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Quote Originally Posted by Summer Heat View Post
    Hello there. Would you be able to quickly explain this? What benefits do IMR batteries have over protected batteries when it comes to level 5 and 6?
    You can certainly get by with protected ICR - it seems to be within spec, although I haven't measured the current draw. But there's a difference between within spec and what's good for a cell, and I would personally prefer to use IMR/Hybrid cells on the L6 in particular.

    Quote Originally Posted by richbuff View Post
    I am looking for something with both throw and power, and it looks like this is it. Single, powerful emitter combined with a large reflector would fill a hole in my collection.
    Yes, it is nice to see something with this much power also have excellent throw - without all the overlapping well artifacts of multi-emitter lights.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Quote Originally Posted by selfbuilt View Post
    Yes, it is nice to see something with this much power also have excellent throw - without all the overlapping well artifacts of multi-emitter lights.
    I have to agree with this 100%. My K60 has a very gorgeous beam, the emitter is perfectly centered and the beam is very clean and symmetrical. There is a slight donut hole but it is not bad at all. I really love the color temperature of the beam as well. It is not to high, and not to low for my taste. I just bought a second K60 and I really hope it will be just as good as the first one I got.

  15. #15
    Unenlightened
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    VietNam
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    I wonder which one is better. The 5000lm Acebeam K60 or the 4000lm Fenix TK75 2015 edition The K60 has higher output lumens (and higher price, too) but it can't keep that ouput level for so long, while the TK75 can hold maximum output (4000lm) for about 15-20 minutes (I guess) before step down to the lower level.

    Any advice, please?

  16. #16

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Quote Originally Posted by daicatudius View Post
    Any advice, please?
    Personally, I'm a sucker for a clean spillbeam. While throw can be excellent on multi-emitter setups, I find I can still notice multi-well artifacts in the periphery of my vision. Just a personal perspective, though.

    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  17. #17

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Hi selfbuilt,

    Are you able to unscrew the tailcap on your K60 unit? I am trying to waterproof my K60 with lubricant and I noticed the tailcap does not unscrew with significant force applied, even though it is threaded. I think mines may have come with a factory adhesive in place so as to not to be readily disassembled. The same thing with the retaining ring on the bezel.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Quote Originally Posted by Summer Heat View Post
    Are you able to unscrew the tailcap on your K60 unit? I am trying to waterproof my K60 with lubricant and I noticed the tailcap does not unscrew with significant force applied, even though it is threaded. I think mines may have come with a factory adhesive in place so as to not to be readily disassembled. The same thing with the retaining ring on the bezel.
    Yes, both ends of mine won't open with hand force either. I presume they must have used thread-locker on both the tailcap and bezel.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  19. #19
    Flashaholic* Fusion_m8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia.
    Posts
    1,879

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Fantastic review as always!
    Last edited by Fusion_m8; 08-14-2015 at 05:59 AM.
    Before we can become old and wise, first we have to be young and foolish.
    When I die, I want to be like grandpa, peaceful and asleep. Unlike his passengers, screaming and yelling...



  20. #20
    MAD777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    3,117

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    This looks to be a ridiculously fantastic flashlight.
    Thank you selfbuilt for this and all of the time and effort you put into your amazing reviews.

    P.S. I'm going to contribute to your battery fund. It's the least I can do to thank you!

  21. #21

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Quote Originally Posted by MAD777 View Post
    P.S. I'm going to contribute to your battery fund. It's the least I can do to thank you!
    Thanks MAD777 - I appreciate that!
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  22. #22
    Unenlightened
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    VietNam
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Hello again selfbuilt

    Could you please tell me what the brightness level (in lumen) after this light stepped down from the highest level?
    Sorry I am new and I can't read your charts properly

    Thank you!


  23. #23
    MAD777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    3,117

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    The answer is, "plenty of lumens." LOL I'm just kidding with you.
    Seriously, the axis on the left is just relative numbers. What's important is that 200 is twice 100, etc. on the graph. So, the K60 starts out at 750 and drops down to about 660. By dividing 660 by 750 we get 88%. From the tables above the graphs, we see the peak lumen is 4950. So 88% of 4950 is 4356.
    And 4356 lumens is "plenty of lumens". LOL

    (660/750)*4950=4356

    BTW, I was ready with the answer because I've been drooling over this light!
    Last edited by MAD777; 08-17-2015 at 04:17 PM.

  24. #24

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Quote Originally Posted by daicatudius View Post
    Could you please tell me what the brightness level (in lumen) after this light stepped down from the highest level?
    Sorry I am new and I can't read your charts properly
    Quote Originally Posted by MAD777 View Post
    Seriously, the axis on the left is just relative numbers. What's important is that 200 is twice 100, etc. on the graph. So, the K60 starts out at 750 and drops down to about 660. By dividing 660 by 750 we get 88%.
    Yes, that's not exactly it. The relative scale of my graphs is not perfectly linear to lumen output (although it's not a bad approximation). You would have to follow the link in the review to where I discuss how to convert the relative scale to estimated lumens to get a more accurate number. If you do this, you will see the step-down level is pretty close to ~4200 lumens.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  25. #25
    *Flashaholic* Gunner12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    10,061

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Great review as usual!

    Glad to see that you're still doing reviews after all these years.

  26. #26

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    I'm happy to see another Acebeam review. I had been hoping for more Acebeam reviews for some time now... This one blows away the competing Lumintop.

    Now if only they would send you a review unit of the X60M...

  27. #27

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Quote Originally Posted by daicatudius View Post
    I wonder which one is better. The 5000lm Acebeam K60 or the 4000lm Fenix TK75 2015 edition The K60 has higher output lumens (and higher price, too) but it can't keep that ouput level for so long, while the TK75 can hold maximum output (4000lm) for about 15-20 minutes (I guess) before step down to the lower level. Any advice, please?
    The new TK75 has four XM-L2s in four reflectors. Each reflector is smaller than each of the three reflectors in the original TK75. If this means that that the new TK75 will have less throw than the original, despite the increased lumens, I will prefer to keep my original TK75.

    I am very happy with my K60, and Selfbuilt's excellent review reassures me that I made a good choice.

    Brightnorm
    Last edited by brightnorm; 08-28-2015 at 04:44 PM.

  28. #28

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Are these shipping with the batteries included?
    the harder I work, the luckier I get.

  29. #29

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    Quote Originally Posted by KarstGhost View Post
    Are these shipping with the batteries included?
    Good question, I'm not sure. My review sample came with Acebeam-branded IMR cells, but I don't know how these are commonly being sold.
    Full list of all my reviews: flashlightreviews.ca. Latest hobby: whiskyanalysis.com. Latest flashlight review: Thrunite TN42.
    Gratefully accepting donations to my battery fund.

  30. #30

    Default Re: Acebeam K60 (XHP70, 4x18650) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, VIDEO +

    They are not sold with batteries unless the seller specifically bundles them. The batteries they sent selfbuilt are button-top LG HE2.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •