Review: XTAR DRAGON VP4 Plus Charger

stephenk

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
761
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Disclaimer


This charger was kindly sent to me for review by GearBest.
Coupon: GBLED2016 for 8% off.
No other payment was received for this review, and a free charger does not stop me from being critical when required during reviews.


Introduction


XTAR have a good reputation for quality li-ion and NiMH chargers, and good worldwide distribution. Whilst other manufacturers such as SkyRC, Opus, and Liitokala have had analysing chargers on the market for a while, this is XTAR's first foray into analysing chargers. Do good things come to those who wait?


Note: this review is based on usability. If you want to read technical tests, please refer to HKJ's excellent technical review at
http://lygte-info.dk/review/Review%20Charger%20Xtar%20VP4%20Plus%20Dragon%20UK.html
ykJkyIPm.jpg


hjb4Xcnm.jpg



Overview


The XTAR DRAGON VP4 Plus comes in a cardboard box, and includes:

  • VP4 Plus charger
  • 12V/3A adapter
  • Pair of probes
  • 3A car adapter
  • Charger bag
  • Manual
  • Warranty card


The XTAR DRAGON VP4 Plus is a 4-bay charger with the following functionality and features:

  • Charges li-ion cells (to 4.2V only)
  • Charges NiMH batteries
  • Charges 11.1V/3s battery packs
  • Charge USB devices up to 2.4A such as smart phones and tablets from mains, or from cells in charger (powerbank function)
  • Displays charged current, and % charge
  • Claimed to handle a large range of cell sizes e.g. 10440 to 32650 and AAAA to D cell
  • Test probes that can measure the cell voltage and internal resistance (iR)
  • 0.5A/1A/2A charging currents (2A only in slots 1 and 4)
  • Charge-Discharge-Charge capacity (analysing) "test" mode
  • Discharge-Charge "refresh" mode
  • No fan!
  • Simple user interface
  • Coloured status lights for each slot
  • Beeping noise when charge has completed
  • Can record and playback test results


Design


The XTAR DRAGON VP4 Plus is solidly constructed from heat resistant plastic. It is much larger than most other 4-bay chargers which allows for fan-less heat dissipation (unlike the Opus BT-C3100), and makes it much easier to get cells in and out of the slots (unlike the Liitokala Lii-500). The slots can handle long protected 18650 and 26650 cells up to approximately 72mm in length. As with nearly all other chargers, if protected 20700 and 21700 cells arrive on the market, they may have issues fitting.


There are connections for the 3A/12V power supply, USB output, USB connection for test probes, and JST-XH for 11.1V/3s battery pack. I prefer chargers with 12V power supplies as they are typically more stable than USB power supplies.

VaVb0sLm.jpg


BKDmiyim.jpg


xcJgljgm.jpg


O78LV8am.jpg



User Interface


The user interface is fairly simple and easy to learn, with just three buttons:
Left - Current/Refresh button - short press will change current, long press will start refresh cycle.
Middle - Display - change between displayed slots, long press will set the display to low brightness, double click returns to main screen.
Right - Record/Test - short press will recall saved test data, long press will start a test cycle, double click will turn sound on/off.
Note: When display brightness is dimmed, the first press of any button will restore it to max brightness.


Each slot/bay has a coloured indicator light:
Blue - Discharging
Red - Charging
Green - Battery fully charged/reverse polarity/poor connection.


The screen displays 2 slots at a time, which can be changed by pressing the middle button. When charging 2 cells, the charger automatically displays the slots in use. With 4 cells, this alternatives between slots 1 and 4, and slots 2 and 3.

The screen can show % charged, mode, charge current, charge current, battery type, and displayed slot. Voltage and iR measurements from the test probes are shown in the middle of the display. The display also had an animated bar effect for charging and discharging. There is no time counter. Unlike some other chargers, the screen is still easily readable when dimmed which is useful.


When charge mode is complete for each slot, there is an audible beep, and the amount charge display alternates with "FULL". There are also beeps with each button press. The beep can be quite useful, and can also be turned off if you don't want to wake anyone up.

ETt8kljm.jpg


Lk2Mfdmm.jpg



Operation


The charging rates are 0.5A, 1A, and 2A (latter in slots 1 and 4 only). These charge rates suit the majority of commonly used batteries, though the lowest charging rate of 0.5A is relatively high compared to other analysing chargers. This should be OK for Eneloop AAA and other AAA NiMH that can handle fast charging. However it may not be good for AAA NiMH cells that are not recommended for fast charging e.g. yellow/green Ikea Laddas have a 0.075A recommended charging current. Newer smaller li-ion cells such as 14500 and 16340 cells should be able to handle 0.5A, though it may be too high for some 10440 cells. Thus, I would recommend this charger only for use with NiMH and Li-ion batteries that can safely handle at least 0.5A charge rates. Only 3.6/3.7V li-ion batteries can be charged (to 4.2V), which is the majority of the intended market. LiFePO4 3.2V (3.6V max) and 3.8V (4.3/4.35V max) charging is unsupported.


The default mode is charge. This starts automatically after around 3 seconds post cell insertion, so it is generally best to select the mode and current before inserting the batteries. However, the charger has a soft start, charging at a low charge rate for the first 10 minutes. Be aware that charge current can be changed during charge by pressing the charge button, and that the charge current defaults to 1A when turned on. During testing, I experienced a brief mains power outage, which was enough to change the charging rate from 0.5A to 1A. XTAR need to change the default charging rate to 0.5A in future revisions.


All slots/bays have to use the same charge current and mode. Thus you can charge an 18650 in slot 1, and AA Eneloop on slot 2 on the same charge rate e.g. 1A. However, you cannot charge an 18650 in slot 1, whilst running test mode on an 18650 in slot 2. Neither can you charge at 1A in slot 1, and charge at 0.5A in slot 2. This may be an issue for some users, but I personally prefer to charge and test in batches of the same battery type. It is also possibly "safer" to charge this way, so that things don't get mixed up. Whilst in refresh and test modes, charging can occur in one bay, whilst discharging is occurring in another.


Batteries came off the charger at 1.48V for NiMH (Eneloops) and for li-ion came off the charger at 4.19V. This was measured using the test probes (see below).


One of the unique features of the XTAR DRAGON VP4 Plus is the ability to test iR and voltage using spring loaded and gold plated test probes, in a similar way to testing voltage using a digital multi-meter (DMM). DMMs can be a bit intimidating to some users, and thus this is an excellent feature. As the functionality and measuring ranges are limited, it cannot fully replace a DMM - for example you can't use it to test flashlight tail cap current. I have been using the test probes to test iR and Voltage for each cell both before and after charge. It can also be useful to test voltage so as to decide if cells need charging or not, or even test voltage and iR on cells before and after being charged on other chargers (such as a slow NiMH charger). The test probes can be used whilst other cells are charging, but you cannot use them on cells in the slots/bays. The measurements with the probes were fairly consistent (+/-15%) as long as good contact was made, and are in theory an improvement over the measurements on the Lii-500 and BT-C3100 which have to account for multiple objects in the path of resistance. To use, the probes have to be touched together, which zeros the display, then they can be used to test the voltage and iR. The probes are directional (red probe is used for the +ve end of the battery, and the black probe for the -ve end), and thus if polarity is reversed, they record zero. The probes can be a bit fiddly to use with smaller cells. It is also easy to accidentally touch the probes together, making the display change to probe mode (other functions still continue in the background).

gmRBGj8m.jpg



The test (charge-discharge-charge) and refresh (discharge-charge) functions have a relatively low cut-off at 2.6V for li-ion. This did not trip protection circuits on the protected cells tested (two Blazar protected Sanyo NCR18650GA 3500mAh, which has the PCB set to cut off at 2.5V+/-0.1V). Most newer li-ion cells from quality manufacturers should be able to go this low, but some older or poor quality cells may not. Low cut off is 0.85V for NiMH. Discharge current is at least half of the charge current, at either 0.5A (for 1A and 2A charge rates) or 0.25V (for 0.5A charge rates). Capacity results were as expected given the discharge to 2.6V, and thus seem to be accurate. A comparison between the XTAR DRAGON VP4 Plus's charge and discharge test and the Lii-500 discharge test on four Sanyo NCR18650GAs is below.
Cell Dragon Disch/Ch Lii-500 Disch
1 3602/3629 3287
2 3507/3560 3395
3 3556/3559 3388
4 3449/3568 3422

ag1Ttoam.jpg


NS0qRPHm.jpg



Whilst there is no dedicated discharge for storage mode for li-ion, as on the SkyRC MC3000, it is possible to just use the refresh mode to discharge the cells, and remove them from the charger at around 40% charge.


There is no fan, and thus when discharging in all 4 slots (tested in indoor 30C ambient heat) the base of the charger was very warm. Despite the large size of this charger I found that handled heat only marginally better than the also fan-less Lii-500. If you have a laptop cooler/chill mat, I would recommend using it, though it is not essential. To select refresh or test modes, the left or right button needs a long press (respectively) before inserting the cells. When the refresh or test mode finishes, the display alternates between current discharged and current charged which is a nice touch. The test record and recall function is also potentially very useful.


The % charge display seems to be reasonably accurate. However, there are some idiosyncrasies. The first is based on its algorithm, and possibly related to how voltage typically rises rapidly at the beginning of the charge from resting voltage. For example I pulled out an Eneloop at 13% full and then placed it back in the charger 10 secs later, which then shown at 58% full. Later during the charges the % charge display returned back to more expected figures compared to the other Eneloops being charged. The same was repeated for li-ion, but with less of % jump. The display also stays on 99% for a little longer than expected during li-ion charging. When discharging, 01% is displayed for quite a long time. This is probably due to the discharge function discharging to well below what is deemed to be an empty battery by the % charge indicators (e.g. the charge discharges to 2.6V, but 01% charge reading may be based around 3.0V).


I don't have any 3S battery packs to test that functionality. This functionality will be useful for users of RC toys and other devices that use 3S battery packs, and could avoid users having to purchase seperate chargers for li-ion, NiMH, and 3S battery pack charging. The default charge rate for 3S battery packs is 1A.


The USB output and power bank functionality was not tested in any depth, other than to test that it works. The 0V activation functionality was not able to tested as I've never discharged a cell below 2.9V resting voltage during use.


Reverse polarity detection was tested successfully, "Err" is displayed along with a rapid beeping noise when reverse polarity is detected.


Lack of voltage display during charging


There has much discussion on internet message boards about the lack of voltage display during charing on the XTAR DRAGON VP4 Plus. Whilst there are plenty of popular li-ion and NiMH chargers that do not show voltage, all well known analysing chargers display the voltage during charging. Instead, the XTAR DRAGON VP Plus shows the above mentioned % charge value. It could be argued that users knowledgeable enough about batteries to want to purchase an analysing charger, would also be knowledgeable enough to be able to approximate the charging state based on the voltage alone. It could also be questioned, that users will "trust" a charger more if they can see what it is doing (i.e. if voltage has become stable at around 4.2V near the end of the charge, that it is close to termination).


On the other side of the argument, is that it is good practice to measure voltage before and after charge with a DMM (or in the case of the XTAR DRAGON VP4 Plus, the test probes). This provides the user as to state of discharge (e.g. if the voltage is below 2.5V you might want to be a bit careful), or how well cells used in series are balancing during discharge. It also allows the user to check that the charger is terminating at the correct voltage. Thus the lack of voltage display may be a good thing if it forces the user to check cell voltage before and after charge using the test probes.


This subject could be discussed until the cows come home, so I'll stop now. I would personally prefer voltage display during charging along with the animated bar to show approximate charge progress. However, the lack of voltage display during charging would not stop me from purchasing this otherwise excellent analysing charger.


Conclusion



  • Build quality is excellent, and the device functioned correctly.
  • The charger can charge and analyse most newer NiMH and 3.6/3.7V li-ion batteries, as long as they can handle at least 0.5A charging rate, and are less than 72mm in length.
  • The user interface is fairly easy to use, and record function is useful.
  • The test probes are a useful and unique feature for analysing chargers.
  • The lack of voltage display during charging is a bizarre omission. The % charge display has some idiosyncrasies, and default charge rate should be 0.5A instead of 1A.


The XTAR DRAGON VP4 Plus is clearly aimed at those who want to charge and analyse a wide range of batteries, but with a simple user interface, and don't want to worry about using a seperate DMM to test voltage and resistance. With a relatively high price point, and some limitations (note: no analysing charger is "perfect"), it won't suit everyone. However with many flashlight users and vapers having high disposable income, I expect that the XTAR DRAGON VP4 Plus will be a very popular product for its intended market. I recommend this charger for users who want an easy to use, simplified, and well built analysing charger.

CnbWYVRm.jpg
 
Last edited:

OttaMattaPia

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Dec 3, 2016
Messages
135
Thanks for the review.

Almost bought this charger yesterday but decided they would probably make updates to it for the next release that would include changing the percentage voltage to actual voltage readout.

That and the price seemed high compared to competitive products that offered more such as the MC3000 (even though I have written of SkyRC products)

For now I "settled" for a AccuPower IQ338LX since at $39.95 it basically does what the Dragon does and I only need to charge 18650's and D cells. The IQ338LX holds 4 D cells simultaneously.
I hope I didn't mke a mistake buying an AccuPower product since I'm not familiar with them but it had what I was looking for (for now)

Anyway, thanks for the good info. :thumbsup:
 

stephenk

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
761
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Thanks for the review.

Almost bought this charger yesterday but decided they would probably make updates to it for the next release that would include changing the percentage voltage to actual voltage readout.

That and the price seemed high compared to competitive products that offered more such as the MC3000 (even though I have written of SkyRC products)

For now I "settled" for a AccuPower IQ338LX since at $39.95 it basically does what the Dragon does and I only need to charge 18650's and D cells. The IQ338LX holds 4 D cells simultaneously.
I hope I didn't mke a mistake buying an AccuPower product since I'm not familiar with them but it had what I was looking for (for now)

Anyway, thanks for the good info. :thumbsup:

I doubt they will replace the % reading with voltage anytime soon, if at all. I think XTAR are purposefully trying to make it "simpler", in a similar way to Apple dumbing down many of it's product for the consumer market (e.g. replacing Aperture with Photos, etc). As I mentioned in my review, I would personally prefer voltage readout during charging, but it wouldn't stop me from buying this product. The XTAR DRAGON VP4 Plus is now my charger of choice, retiring the Liitokala Lii-500. The only exception being for charging some NiMH cells that cannot handle fast charging, for which I use the Panasonic BQ-CC17, but measure the voltages before and after with the DRAGON's test probes.
 

StandardBattery

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 2, 2007
Messages
2,959
Location
MA
Overall this seems like a pretty nice charger. I almost bought it a few times, but don't really need another charger right now unless it is extremely good and this one seems to be a bit over priced. I almost got it on the BF deal, but I think after the excitement dies a bit they won't be able to maintain this high price. I could be wrong, but even so no pressing reason to get it now. Maybe the Russians will release some enhanced firmware and transform that other charger. It could be the technical chargers on the VP2 days are over at XTAR, even as they add more capabilities they get dumbed down. With the IR measurement I think these really are aimed not at the general hobbyists, but at the Vaper community. In that market this charger seems to be well suited and price is likely just fine, so it could be this charger is just not made for the typical market one might think of using LiIon chargers. Sure they tried for some overlap in making it a NiMH and Li-Ion charger, but the extra features were likely targeted at the vap users.
 

stephenk

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
761
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Overall this seems like a pretty nice charger. I almost bought it a few times, but don't really need another charger right now unless it is extremely good and this one seems to be a bit over priced. I almost got it on the BF deal, but I think after the excitement dies a bit they won't be able to maintain this high price. I could be wrong, but even so no pressing reason to get it now. Maybe the Russians will release some enhanced firmware and transform that other charger. It could be the technical chargers on the VP2 days are over at XTAR, even as they add more capabilities they get dumbed down. With the IR measurement I think these really are aimed not at the general hobbyists, but at the Vaper community. In that market this charger seems to be well suited and price is likely just fine, so it could be this charger is just not made for the typical market one might think of using LiIon chargers. Sure they tried for some overlap in making it a NiMH and Li-Ion charger, but the extra features were likely targeted at the vap users.
It is most definitely consumer orientated, rather than the hobbyist orientation of the MC3000.
 

Tachead

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 3, 2015
Messages
3,872
Location
Northwestern Ontario, Canada
I doubt they will replace the % reading with voltage anytime soon, if at all. I think XTAR are purposefully trying to make it "simpler", in a similar way to Apple dumbing down many of it's product for the consumer market (e.g. replacing Aperture with Photos, etc). As I mentioned in my review, I would personally prefer voltage readout during charging, but it wouldn't stop me from buying this product. The XTAR DRAGON VP4 Plus is now my charger of choice, retiring the Liitokala Lii-500. The only exception being for charging some NiMH cells that cannot handle fast charging, for which I use the Panasonic BQ-CC17, but measure the voltages before and after with the DRAGON's test probes.

It has nothing to do with dumbing it down. Charge percentage is a much more accurate way to show charge level. Once a battery reaches the final stages of charge, for instance, it will read 4.20V but, if you arent monitoring when it hit that point it could be anywhere from a minute to 2 hours until charge is complete, there is no way to tell. Percentage readout, on the other hand, is quite accurate on many devices and will give you an idea of charge level through the whole charge cycle. There is a reason why charge percentage is used on most much higher price/quality devices as well. Although I like to have a voltage readout as well, I am finding that percentage readout is much more useful for gauging how much charge time is left.
 

Gauss163

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
1,604
Location
USA
Charge percentage is a much more accurate way to show charge level [...]

That's only relevant if the device can accurately measure charge percentage across the entire spectrum of cells that it accepts. To do that requires fairly sophisticated fuel gauge algorithms, which have not yet made their way into consumer-level chargers. Any claims that the percentage is reasonable accurate are pure marketing hype (the one thing XTAR does excel at). Don't believe the hype.

Further, to be most useful, one desires accurate estimates of both SOC and (dis)charge time remaining. I am not aware of any consumer-level analyzing charger that accurately does so (even for one of those parameters). For many chargers it is not even clear what these nebulous displayed "percentages" are supposed to be measuring (since they are often so far off the mark).
 
Last edited:

Tachead

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 3, 2015
Messages
3,872
Location
Northwestern Ontario, Canada
That's only relevant if the device can accurately measure charge percentage across the entire spectrum of cells that it accepts. To do that requires fairly sophisticated fuel gauge algorithms, which have not yet made their way into consumer-level chargers. Any claims that the percentage is reasonable accurate are pure marketing hype (the one thing XTAR does excel at). Don't believe the hype.
Even without more advanced algorithms, it is still a far better way to estimate charge level imo(also, unless you helped design the Dragon you really have no idea how advanced the algorithms it's using are). Voltage readout does very little when it comes to gauging remaining charge time. Especially in the last stages of charge when the voltage stays at 4.2V.

I can charge the same exact type of cells at the exact same discharge levels, one in my VP2 and one in my Dragon, and the Dragon's percentage readout allows for a far better estimate of remaining charge time imo.

Now that I have used both kinds of readouts on several different devices, I much prefer percentage readout. I do still like to have voltage readout though to save a step(not having to use a DMM) to see the cell voltage before and after the charge cycle. During the charge/discharge cycle voltage readout is of little use imo because it is not accurate due to the cell being under load/current.

It would have been nice if the Dragon came with both methods of readout.
 
Last edited:

Gauss163

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
1,604
Location
USA
Even without more advanced algorithms, it is still a far better way to estimate charge level imo

Not true. What is true is that in some cases such heuristics may be better than alternatives, and in other cases the alternative solutions will be better. What works best in any particular context will depend on many factors such as health of the battery, chemistry, knowledge of the user, quality of heuristics, etc, etc.

also, unless you helped design the Dragon you really have no idea how advanced the algorithms it's using are).

That's a false inference too. If one is aware of the state of the art in fuel gauge algorithms then one knows well what is attainable with current technology, what the major hurdles are, etc. In particular one can easily distingish marketing hype from reality.

Wild guesstimates about SOC aren't very useful in many contexts, e.g. cells with higher IR that quickly jump to termination voltage (is it a 350mAh cell or 3500mAH cell? The charger has no way to know). Nor does it help when charging to storage voltage (it may be more that 50% off using SOC guesstimates, but the user may know the exact voltage required; being wrong here could be fatal, since it could lead cells to drain too low in storage). Etc, etc.

Generally, given any simple heuristics, it is easy to devise contexts where one is better than the other, and vice versa. Which types of heuristics prove to be more connvient for any user will depend on many factors. None will be perfect. Most will be very far from that (despite marketing hype claiming otherwise).

None of the consumer charger manufacturers have specific expertise in fuel gauge algorithms. That's a very esoteric area that only much larger companies can afford to invest in R&D. Typically smaller companies gain access to that technology when it percolates down from the larger firms in bundled solutions. But this has not yet happened for consumer-level analyzing chargers.
 
Last edited:

Tachead

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 3, 2015
Messages
3,872
Location
Northwestern Ontario, Canada
Not true. What is true is that in some cases such heuristics may be better than alternatives, and in other cases the alternative solutions will be better. What works best in any particular context will depend on many factors such as health of the battery, chemistry, knowledge of the user, quality of heuristics, etc, etc.



That's a false inference too. If one is aware of the state of the art in fuel gauge algorithms then one knows well what is attainable with current technology, what the major hurdles are, etc. In particular one can easily distingish marketing hype from reality.

Wild guesstimates about SOC aren't very useful in many contexts, e.g. cells with higher IR that quickly jump to termination voltage (is it a 350mAh cell or 3500mAH cell? The charger has no way to know). Nor does it help when charging to storage voltage (it may be more that 50% off using SOC guesstimates, but the user may know the exact voltage required; being wrong here could be fatal, since it could lead cells to drain too low in storage). Etc, etc.

Generally, given any simple heuristics, it is easy to devise contexts where one is better than the other, and vice versa. Which types of heuristics prove to be more connvient for any user will depend on many factors. None will be perfect. Most will be very far from that (despite marketing hype claiming otherwise).

None of the consumer charger manufacturers have specific expertise in fuel gauge algorithms. That's a very esoteric area that only much larger companies can afford to invest in R&D. Typically smaller companies gain access to that technology when it percolates down from the larger firms in bundled solutions. But this has not yet happened for consumer-level analyzing chargers.

Lol, notice I said in my opinion. I have used both and even compared two Xtar products, one with each method with a number of different age and capacity cells, and I find the percentage readout to be a much better way to estimate charge level and remaining charge time over cell voltage. I realize it is an estimate and accuracy depends on many factors and I am sure that most people do as well but, I find it to be much more useful during the charge/discharge cycle, especially during the final top up when all a voltage readout reads is 4.2V for a long period of time. This is just my opinion and YMMV of course.

No it is not. Have you ran scientific tests to compare Xtars algorithm accuracy to a "large firm" as you put it? Do you design battery percentage algorithms for a living? Do you even know anything about the inner workings of Xtars algorithms? Do you even own a Dragon? Im guessing not on all counts. You are just running your mouth(keyboard) as usual Gauss. Your unsubstantiated claims and trolling, especially in the Xtar threads(havent you been warned about this?), get tiring I bet for many users, including myself, as well as for the moderators of this site. Please just move on, we get you dont like Xtar.
 
Last edited:

stephenk

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
761
Location
Brisbane, Australia
I'm surprised it took Gauss163 so long to start trolling another XTAR thread. The black triangle at the bottom left of posts can be used to report trolls.

Back on topic - as mentioned in the above review the % charge is reasonably accurate. There are some idiosyncrasies based on how it handles the voltage difference between resting and non resting voltages, but that is to be expected.

Whilst I would prefer voltage readout during charging, I would agree with tachead that the % charge allows for a better estimate of how much longer there is to charge. The more I use the Dragon the more I'm liking the % charge readout.
 

SG Hall

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
1,096
Location
Sampson Flat, Sth. Aust.
Thanks for the informative review stephenk. Nicely done. [emoji106]
I purchased the VP2 when it first came out or I'd be all over this probably.
I am a numbers geek so I personally prefer voltage readout over charge %, but I admit that charge % is what I mentally approximate when I see the voltage! :)
 

stephenk

Enlightened
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
761
Location
Brisbane, Australia
When I get the chance I'll do a % charge vs time charged test at intervals to see how linear the reading is. I'll publish the results here.
 

Gauss163

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
1,604
Location
USA
I'm surprised it took Gauss163 so long to start trolling... .

Explaining pertinent technical matters is very far from "trolling". I have no vested interest in any particular charger manufacturer, nor any bias. Rather, my intent is to share my professional expertise in order to help user's sort truth from fiction (marketing hype, old wives tales, etc). You are welcome to ignore that if you have no interest in such technicalities. But many readers do.
 

Bullzeyebill

Flashaholic
Joined
Feb 21, 2003
Messages
12,164
Location
CA
Explaining pertinent technical matters is very far from "trolling".

You are perceived as trolling by fellow members, in this thread and other threads. Would be good if you stepped away from this thread, and review comments made by you in this thread and others you have made comments in, to see why you are perceived as "trolling".

Bill
 

kreisl

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
2,241
the progress of biological time depicted in that video is linear: 1 frame taken per 1 biological second, speed 30x, 30 biological seconds = 1 youtube second, 30fps youtube. 8 youtube minutes = ?? biological hours, you do the math ;)
 
Top