Energizer Folding Fluorescent Lantern

rlhess

Enlightened
Joined
Apr 27, 2002
Messages
864
Location
Aurora, Ontario, Canada
Hi, I managed to run across several (bought one) Energizer 2-tube folding fluorescent lanterns today.

It has two 4W tubes and runs on 4 D cells. You can switch on one or both tubes (can't alternate which tube runs so if you're using it a lot on one tube, it might be worthwhile every battery change or two to swap tubes).

It CLAIMS (I just got it) to run for 40 hours with one tube and 20 hours with two tubes.

One tube (at one foot) gave me about 8 cd and two tubes peaked at about 13 cd.

Since this is pretty even illumination over a broad range, I would estimate perhaps 0.7 * pi * 11 or about 24 lumens output. Not bad for alleged 20 hours burn time.

Let's do the calcs for burn time.

18AH to 0.8V (or so) and 8W at 6V is about 1.33A so I don't believe the burn time. As the voltage drops the light will, too OR the current will go up.

Perhaps they're starving the tubes?

Yup...both tubes about 0.68A or 4W for both tubes and 0.37A or 2.2W for one tube (assuming no significant voltage drop from 6V).

Those current drains do match the run times one would expect--and it's not even asking it to go to 0.8V.

Two tubes work at 0.5A and 4.5V which is a fair indication of how far you can easily go down in voltage and they were still quite bright. Two tubes were very dim but would still work at 3.0V. At 3.0V the two tubes also draw 0.5A.

Cheers,

Richard
 

Saaby

Flashaholic
Joined
Jun 17, 2002
Messages
7,447
Location
Utah
I have one but have managed to loose it in the house. Great for scout camps and stuff, poor mans alternative to those Coleman propane lanterns I dare say. Wouldn't take it on say a hiking trip though, those D-Cell batteries are heavy!
 

scott

Enlightened
Joined
Feb 15, 2001
Messages
279
Location
PA
I have one. It's a great lantern! The batteries will indeed last 20/40hrs.

Scott
 

Saaby

Flashaholic
Joined
Jun 17, 2002
Messages
7,447
Location
Utah
He he he, this is off topic just a tiny bit but thats the great thing here, you people don't seem to mind much!

I bought one of the folding LED lanterns today, think of it as the Flouressents baby brother...

Same design except the lens isn't clear all through, it's clear on one side and white on the other... It's about as thick as 2 Jewl cases and just a touch larger then say...a casette tape, it's GREAT!

Ryan
 

brightnorm

Flashaholic
Joined
Oct 13, 2001
Messages
7,160
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Saaby:
....you people don't seem to mind much!
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Ryan,

Welcome to CPF,

You will become a true Flashaholic when you no longer think of us as "you people". I guarantee that it will happen sooner than you think!

PS: I just bought the Energizer to be a little brother to my 5 Coleman and 4 Dorcy 8xD's.

Brightnorm
 

Saaby

Flashaholic
Joined
Jun 17, 2002
Messages
7,447
Location
Utah
Well...I don't think of you as "you people" thats just the way I phrased it, made more sense than we CPF people don't mind going off topic so...

Now that I think about it (look how off topic we are now) neither one is proper english...oh well.

I ain't got no proper grammar trainin, and I ain't not gunna get none...No that's just a joke.


Signing as one of the people mentioned above...
 

Nehmo

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Apr 15, 2005
Messages
1
Using D cells is an advantage. Flashlight batteries are priced about the same regardless of size: Ds go for about as much as AAAs. But the physically larger cells store more energy, so you get more for your money in batteries if the lantern uses Ds.
 

Lynx_Arc

Flashaholic
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
11,212
Location
Tulsa,OK
C and D cells cost considerably more than AA/AAA cells around here... perhaps twice as much for alkaline in quantity.
Personally I like the idea of CCFL flourescent and LED together because CCFL tubes last a long time, are smaller and put out the same amount of light as standard tubes. With LEDs in a lantern you can run it at a lower setting increasing runtime tremendously... possibly even allowing the use of smaller batteries/weight.
 

cheesehead

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Messages
1,189
Location
the dairy state
D cells are the cheapest, period, for output. It doesn't matter if they cost 2 or 3 or 4 times more, they have many times more power.
 

markdi

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 27, 2003
Messages
2,403
Location
Portland Oregon
alkaline d cells have a higher internal cell resistance
than aa cells.

under certain high drain sitiuationa aa nimh have more usefull power than alkaline d cells.
 

java_man

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Messages
109
Here is some hard to find data on alkaline batteries

batteries8dr.jpg
 

cheesehead

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Messages
1,189
Location
the dairy state
JM,

Brilliant, what I wanted to say, but was too lazy to look it up. I'm not sure why going from the tiny cells of a 9 volt to the D cell the resistance would be lowest with AA cells, but the rest of it makes perfect sense.

Thanks!
 

Lynx_Arc

Flashaholic
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
11,212
Location
Tulsa,OK
It could be a lot of internal resistance has to do with the electrode and the optimal size for the type of electrode technology used in alkalines in AA, with AAA and less being too small in volume or surface area along the electrode and larger cells having electrolyte too far from the electrode to take advantage of it directly needing to sort of handshake electrons too much through the electrolyte in order to pass current. This is all speculation on my part though.
 

java_man

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Messages
109
Lynx and CH,

I was a bit suprised too when I saw that AA had less resistance than D's, but after thinking bout what Lynx said about the area ratio, it makes sense...I *think* the ratio of the electrode area to the depth or thickness of the electolyte would drive the cell resistance.

There are probably other factors at work there too.

The data I compiled came from here >>>

http://www.duracell.com/oem/productdata/default.asp
 

PeLu

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 26, 2001
Messages
1,712
Location
Linz, Austria
It the differences are mainly in their high load behaviour. D cells drop their capacity much, much more at higher loads (which has nothing to do with internal resistance), look at Silverfox' data therefore.
You do not need much load and AA cells are even more cost effective (but that, of course, depends highly on the price difference from AA to D cells).
 

Phaserburn

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 30, 2003
Messages
4,755
Location
Connecticut, USA
Slightly off topic but related, this light performs very well using D nimh cells. Loooong runtime between charges, and you never think twice about using both tubes all the time.

I think I posted this elsewhere sometime back, but here it is for fans of this light: Home Depot stocks Philips replacement tubes that are a wonderful 3000 degree color, not the iritating cold medical lamp washed out blue tint. The warm incan-ish color from this light makes it MUCH nicer to work with and have on near you for extended burns. FWIW.
 

Lynx_Arc

Flashaholic
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
11,212
Location
Tulsa,OK
Get two 4 watt black light bulbs and a mirror ball and have a power outage block party during the storm season. The reason D cells work well is both tubes together draw about 600-700ma which is sort of a sweet spot so to speak. Seems manufacturers of lamp know this as when they go to dual or single tube lights of over about 9watts they go from 4 to 8 D cells in the lights. This probably drops the current down close to 500-700ma again.
 
Top