CandlePowerForums
All "reviews" threads are to be posted within their applicable forums. If administrators or moderators wish to have them published in the Reviews forum, they will move them there. If the reviewer, when posting, wishes to request inclusion in the Reviews forum, they may attach a notice as the first line in their post such as "for submission in the Reviews forum". Alternatively, they can omit such a first line, and simply PM a moderator or administrator asking that it be considered.


Go Back   CandlePowerForums > Flashlights > Flashlight Reviews
CPF Only
User Name
Password
Register

Wicked Lasers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #181  
Old 11-06-2009, 08:09 AM
pobox1475's Avatar
pobox1475 pobox1475 is offline
Flashaholic*
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lombard, IL
Posts: 528
Red face Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

^ Wish I had known, sorry
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 11-16-2009, 11:10 PM
icharry icharry is offline
Unenlightened
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Default Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

Ok - total noob - so plz be kind. I just (like 2 hours ago) got my first real flashlight, a Quark AA... wow is it bright & small. I can easily see the flashaholic thing affecting me.

Anyway, on with my noob question. I see people talking about getting even more lumens by using a 14500 battery. Is that like this - Energizer® Ultimate Lithium Batteries? Or would these at least give more light then the regular copper-top that the Quark shipped with?

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 11-17-2009, 01:34 AM
HKJ's Avatar
HKJ HKJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,249
Default Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by icharry View Post
Anyway, on with my noob question. I see people talking about getting even more lumens by using a 14500 battery. Is that like this - Energizer® Ultimate Lithium Batteries? Or would these at least give more light then the regular copper-top that the Quark shipped with?
They are not, the 14500 batteries are LiIon, they are marked with 3.7 volt (sometimes 3.6) and has up to 4.2 volt of the charger. Put them into equipment not designed for them and it might blow up.
They requires a special LiIon charger.

Some light will (nearly) double their output with these batteries, including Quark.
__________________
My flashlight information page: lygte-info (only some of the contents is in English).
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 11-17-2009, 02:23 AM
Sarlix Sarlix is offline
Unenlightened
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 7
Default Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by HKJ View Post
They are not, the 14500 batteries are LiIon, they are marked with 3.7 volt (sometimes 3.6) and has up to 4.2 volt of the charger. Put them into equipment not designed for them and it might blow up.
They requires a special LiIon charger.

Some light will (nearly) double their output with these batteries, including Quark.


You say they need a special charger, what would happen if you put a protected 14500 into a regular AA charger?. Would it just eventually reduce the life of the battery, or would it be more serious than that, as-in possible explosion?.

I ask because I was going to buy a 14500 today, but because I only want one and will only use it occasionally I don't really want to splash out on a special charger for it.
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 11-17-2009, 03:03 AM
HKJ's Avatar
HKJ HKJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,249
Default Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarlix View Post
You say they need a special charger, what would happen if you put a protected 14500 into a regular AA charger?. Would it just eventually reduce the life of the battery, or would it be more serious than that, as-in possible explosion?.

I ask because I was going to buy a 14500 today, but because I only want one and will only use it occasionally I don't really want to splash out on a special charger for it.
It will not work, a NiMH charger is for 1.2 volt batteries, it might be damaged and the battery might also be damaged, because it will not be charged, but discharged (A protected battery might be able to handle that).

LiIon chargers are not that expensive.
__________________
My flashlight information page: lygte-info (only some of the contents is in English).
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old 11-18-2009, 07:48 AM
pobox1475's Avatar
pobox1475 pobox1475 is offline
Flashaholic*
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lombard, IL
Posts: 528
Cool Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

Quote:
because I only want one and will only use it occasionally I don't really want to splash out on a special charger for it.
I am assuming this is not an EDC light? Li-Ion's main advantages are that they do not LSD and can be topped off often so you almost always have a full charge available IMHO. In a light that is not utilized frequently Eneloops may be the better choice.
Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old 11-18-2009, 10:56 AM
UnknownVT UnknownVT is offline
Flashaholic*
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,270
Arrow Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by icharry View Post
I see people talking about getting even more lumens by using a 14500 battery.
The 14500 is a rechargeable Li-Ion battery of nominal 3.6-3.7V, these require a charger specifically for Li-Ion's.

14500 are fine in the Quark AA - as the Quarks are actually specifically designed for them - using a buck/boost circuit.

14500 will give quite noticeable higher brightness on Max (only).

Comparison on Li-Ion and Quark 123's min and Max levels - Post #62

If the light is to used frequently with 14500 - then the general advice is to use Protected batteries of good repute and a reputable charger (most are not expensive).

But a word of caution - Li-Ion can be potentially dangerous if not treated and used properly - please see:

Using Li-ion cells in LED flashlights safely
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old 11-18-2009, 01:13 PM
icharry icharry is offline
Unenlightened
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Default Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

Cool thanks for the replies....

I see there are a few non-recharge 14500's out there. I'd like to buy 1 to see if its worth it / if I need / want that much more light. I went to RadioShack they had one for $16 !!! If I get into it, then maybe I'll $pend for a recharge system.

Is there a recommended brand to buy for cheaper? Place to buy from? Are you allowed to post links to vendors?

Uggg I am already a flashaholic... yesterday the boards were down & I was bummed, and I am already excited for 4Sevens Thursday....

Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old 11-18-2009, 02:01 PM
HKJ's Avatar
HKJ HKJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,249
Default Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by icharry View Post
I see there are a few non-recharge 14500's out there. I'd like to buy 1 to see if its worth it / if I need / want that much more light. I went to RadioShack they had one for $16 !!! If I get into it, then maybe I'll $pend for a recharge system.
You could call any AA battery 14500, but around here we only use than name for LiIon batteries and they are always rechargeable.
A lithium AA battery is not the same, it is around 1.5 volt like other AA batteries, not the 3.7 volt of LiIon.


Quote:
Originally Posted by icharry View Post
Is there a recommended brand to buy for cheaper? Place to buy from? Are you allowed to post links to vendors?
The favorite dealer with LiIon and charger is AW, but you pay for the reliability and safety. Another much cheaper place is DX, but you also get lower quality and much longer delivery times.
__________________
My flashlight information page: lygte-info (only some of the contents is in English).
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old 11-18-2009, 02:31 PM
PlayboyJoeShmoe's Avatar
PlayboyJoeShmoe PlayboyJoeShmoe is offline
*Flashaholic*
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shepherd, TX (where dat?)
Posts: 10,863
Default Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

A word or several here....

When it comes to 14500 (AA Size) 17500, 17670 and 18650 I find Trustfire & Ultrafire batteries from DX to be good enough.Even the 16340 (123 size) seem to be ok.

The little 10440 (AAA Size) do not have the oomph for all aaa applications.

Lighthound in Pearland, TX also carries AW cells and I plan to get some good 10440s there.
__________________
PBJS P2D Q5,ConneXion, P10C2 (EDC), "Chopped" KL3, M*gP7 D2Flex, If you haven't tried MC-E or P7 yet WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR?
Reply With Quote
  #191  
Old 11-18-2009, 02:32 PM
icharry icharry is offline
Unenlightened
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Default Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

[QUOTE=HKJ;3165044]You could call any AA battery 14500, but around here we only use than name for LiIon batteries and they are always rechargeable.
A lithium AA battery is not the same, it is around 1.5 volt like other AA batteries, not the 3.7 volt of LiIon.


But this is 3.6V and says non-recharge - would this be what I want to use to test the higher light level of my new quark without buying a whole system?

Is this a good brand?

FORGOT TO ADD LINK: http://www.amazon.com/Saft-LS-14500-.../dp/B002GK406C

Last edited by icharry; 11-18-2009 at 02:57 PM. Reason: forgot to add the link!
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old 11-18-2009, 02:35 PM
PlayboyJoeShmoe's Avatar
PlayboyJoeShmoe PlayboyJoeShmoe is offline
*Flashaholic*
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shepherd, TX (where dat?)
Posts: 10,863
Default Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

I suspect the Rat Shak cell is not made for high current use.

I've no way to say yes or no.
__________________
PBJS P2D Q5,ConneXion, P10C2 (EDC), "Chopped" KL3, M*gP7 D2Flex, If you haven't tried MC-E or P7 yet WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR?
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old 11-18-2009, 02:41 PM
HKJ's Avatar
HKJ HKJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,249
Default Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by icharry View Post
But this is 3.6V and says non-recharge - would this be what I want to use to test the higher light level of my new quark without buying a whole system?
I do not known what battery Radio Shack has, can it supply at least 2.4 volt at 2.3 amp. current? That is what Quark requires to reach maximum brightness.
__________________
My flashlight information page: lygte-info (only some of the contents is in English).
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old 11-18-2009, 03:17 PM
UnknownVT UnknownVT is offline
Flashaholic*
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,270
Exclamation Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by icharry View Post
But this is 3.6V and says non-recharge - would this be what I want to use to test the higher light level of my new quark without buying a whole system?
Is this a good brand?
FORGOT TO ADD LINK: http://www.amazon.com/Saft-LS-14500-.../dp/B002GK406C
The primary or Non-rechargeable 14500 apparently are not designed for high current usage - actually came up earlier in this thread -
please see Posts #165, #166, #168

Last edited by UnknownVT; 11-18-2009 at 03:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #195  
Old 11-18-2009, 03:26 PM
KiwiMark KiwiMark is offline
Flashaholic*
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 863
Default Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

[QUOTE=icharry;3165102]
Quote:
Originally Posted by HKJ View Post

From link:
"This is not a high drain battery, please don't use it for the applications with discharging current > 200 mA!"

From a google of Saft LS14500:
Quote:
Saft LS14500 primary lithium cell, is based on the Lithium-Thionyl chloride (Li-SOCl2) chemistry.
and

Quote:
The LS14500 cell is designed specifically for long-term (3 to 15 years) applications, featuring a few UA based currents and periodic pulses, typically in the 5-150 mA range.
and

Quote:
Main Applications:
• Memory back-up
• Real-time clocks
• Utility metering
• Automated meter reading
• Wireless alarms and Security devices
• Emergency locations transmitters beacon
• Electronic toll collection
• Professional electronics


It doesn't strike me as something suitable for powering a Quark light and to be honest I would be a little careful about ignoring warnings when using any Lithium based battery. Lithium has the potential to be dangerous - use with care. Lithium Ion is not AS dangerous, but still use care.
__________________
So many lights, so little money (cause I spent it on lights). I'm not afraid of the dark, the dark is afraid of ME!
Reply With Quote
  #196  
Old 11-18-2009, 03:47 PM
icharry icharry is offline
Unenlightened
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Default Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

Thanks... bummer... unless somewhere there is a high drain one of these. Guess I'll stick with the regular old AA's till then.
Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old 11-18-2009, 03:59 PM
pobox1475's Avatar
pobox1475 pobox1475 is offline
Flashaholic*
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lombard, IL
Posts: 528
Question Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

^ Why not Eneloops?

Welcome to CPF...
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 11-18-2009, 06:04 PM
PlayboyJoeShmoe's Avatar
PlayboyJoeShmoe PlayboyJoeShmoe is offline
*Flashaholic*
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shepherd, TX (where dat?)
Posts: 10,863
Default Re: 4Sevens Quark AA Comparison Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by pobox1475 View Post
^ Why not Eneloops?

Welcome to CPF...
Or Rayovac Hybrids, or Uniross Hybrios, or Kodak Precharged or Duracell "duraloops"
__________________
PBJS P2D Q5,ConneXion, P10C2 (EDC), "Chopped" KL3, M*gP7 D2Flex, If you haven't tried MC-E or P7 yet WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2007-2009, Candle Power Fora, LLC