|
|
|
 |
|

09-04-2009, 03:38 AM
|
|
Unenlightened
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 5
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
I ordered 2 of these (one for me and one for my girlfriend) and they have been shipped very fast. Thanks to shiningbeam!
|

09-05-2009, 01:31 AM
|
 |
Enlightened
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 39
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
I also ordered a couple from sb.com a few months ago. I am running 2 AA Duracell Procell's, and I am still on the original batteries! Granted I don't use it a whole lot, but it works quite well on alkalines. I don't know about it being waterproof, but it is definitely splash proof.
+1 for the RC-N3 Q5!!
p.s. What case is everybody running for their torch?
__________________
* Eagletac T10L * Pelican M11 8050 * Pelican LED 8060 * Pelican 2400 Stealthlite * UK4AA-AN2 * Romisen RC-N3 Q5 * iTP A3 EOS Standard Edition * MG PLI MC-E *
|

09-05-2009, 09:38 AM
|
|
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,704
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempsho
I also ordered a couple from sb.com a few months ago. I am running 2 AA Duracell Procell's, and I am still on the original batteries! Granted I don't use it a whole lot, but it works quite well on alkalines. I don't know about it being waterproof, but it is definitely splash proof.
+1 for the RC-N3 Q5!!
p.s. What case is everybody running for their torch?
|
I never run the AAx2 tube on my RC-N3-Q5s. Too long, bulky, and awkward in my view. I always these lights with the 123 case with a AW protected 16340 li-ion. The light is extremely potent with an RCR123 and has a very nice form factor. If for some reason I had only access to AA cells, then I would implement the AAx2 tube.
Last edited by DHart; 09-05-2009 at 04:58 PM.
|

09-05-2009, 04:47 PM
|
 |
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,136
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Anybody got a beamshot?
|

09-05-2009, 04:57 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Saratoga, California
Posts: 2,328
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
couple are in my beamshot thread
|

09-05-2009, 04:58 PM
|
|
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,704
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Quote:
Originally Posted by recDNA
Anybody got a beamshot?
|
Sure... and a few to compare it to:
|

09-05-2009, 05:11 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Saratoga, California
Posts: 2,328
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
you win.
|

09-05-2009, 07:09 PM
|
|
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,704
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
csshih... this is not a contest... we're ALL winners in this forum!
|

09-05-2009, 08:28 PM
|
 |
Enlightened
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 39
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Quote:
Originally Posted by DHart
I never run the AAx2 tube on my RC-N3-Q5s. Too long, bulky, and awkward in my view. I always these lights with the 123 case with a AW protected 16340 li-ion. The light is extremely potent with an RCR123 and has a very nice form factor. If for some reason I had only access to AA cells, then I would implement the AAx2 tube.
|
I actually meant what holster is everybody using for their lights? (123 operated or 2AA)
__________________
* Eagletac T10L * Pelican M11 8050 * Pelican LED 8060 * Pelican 2400 Stealthlite * UK4AA-AN2 * Romisen RC-N3 Q5 * iTP A3 EOS Standard Edition * MG PLI MC-E *
|

09-05-2009, 11:42 PM
|
|
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,704
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempsho
I actually meant what holster is everybody using for their lights? (123 operated or 2AA)
|
Oh man... sorry, my mistake.
In my case, no case. I don't carry mine. And I don't use a case for the light I do carry. My EDCs are an LD01 in the pocket and a Quark 123 regular head, "neutral" emitter, with tactical tailcap - also in the pocket.
Last edited by DHart; 09-06-2009 at 01:05 AM.
|

09-06-2009, 01:04 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Saratoga, California
Posts: 2,328
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Quote:
Originally Posted by DHart
csshih... this is not a contest... we're ALL winners in this forum! 
|
haha.
|

09-29-2009, 10:05 PM
|
|
Flashaholic
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 489
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Any chance this comes with a smooth reflector? If not, is there a smooth reflector on DX/Kai that will fit this head?
|

09-30-2009, 09:36 AM
|
 |
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Belfast, NI
Posts: 1,478
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Quote:
Originally Posted by dealgrabber2002
Any chance this comes with a smooth reflector? If not, is there a smooth reflector on DX/Kai that will fit this head?
|
I am not sure of which ones will fit, however the older RC-G2 came with a smooth reflector option and the reflector of the RC-N3 is identical to it and compatable. Otherwise the beam of the RC-N3 is quite ringy with an OP reflector and a smooth one certainly would not help in that department and probably not increase the throw significantly either.
|

09-30-2009, 10:12 AM
|
|
Flashaholic
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 489
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Quote:
Originally Posted by TONY M
I am not sure of which ones will fit, however the older RC-G2 came with a smooth reflector option and the reflector of the RC-N3 is identical to it and compatable. Otherwise the beam of the RC-N3 is quite ringy with an OP reflector and a smooth one certainly would not help in that department and probably not increase the throw significantly either.
|
Thanks for the reply. I don't wall hunt that much so ringy beam doesn't bother me much. But I was hoping for a better throw with the smooth reflector, oh well...
|

09-30-2009, 07:33 PM
|
 |
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: VA Beach.
Posts: 1,299
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
You can always polish the hell out of it.....like i did with the c3.
__________________
|

09-30-2009, 07:41 PM
|
 |
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,375
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Nice job Al
|

09-30-2009, 07:45 PM
|
 |
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: VA Beach.
Posts: 1,299
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Thanks man......took a lot of polishing to get it right.
__________________
|

11-07-2009, 01:38 AM
|
|
Flashaholic
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 489
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Quote:
Originally Posted by alfreddajero
Thanks man......took a lot of polishing to get it right.
|
Planning to get one for my gf, how do you polished it? with what? Thanks.
|

11-07-2009, 06:38 AM
|
 |
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: VA Beach.
Posts: 1,299
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
I used Mothers polish, dremel, and polishing head that goes on the dremel.
__________________
|

11-07-2009, 02:24 PM
|
|
Flashaholic
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 489
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Quote:
Originally Posted by alfreddajero
I used Mothers polish, dremel, and polishing head that goes on the dremel.
|
Thanks! I wonder should I even try because my gf could careless about a bit more throw...
|

11-07-2009, 03:06 PM
|
 |
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: VA Beach.
Posts: 1,299
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Then you might as well not even try......it took me a lot of polishing to get it smooth.
__________________
|

11-09-2009, 02:26 PM
|
|
Flashaholic
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 489
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Anyone got a rough est. runtime on 2 eneloops?
|

11-09-2009, 07:01 PM
|
 |
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: VA Beach.
Posts: 1,299
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
If i remember correctly i got about 3hrs of runtime......
__________________
|

11-11-2009, 10:00 PM
|
|
Flashaholic
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 489
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Quote:
Originally Posted by alfreddajero
If i remember correctly i got about 3hrs of runtime......
|
Really? Didn't the OP stated it got 3.5 hrs on 2 alkalines? I thought it would be a bit more more than 3 hrs on 2 eneloops.
|

11-12-2009, 06:27 AM
|
 |
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: VA Beach.
Posts: 1,299
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
It might be a bit more......but thats just a rough estimate on what i got......i use my lights and dont really test them like all the other testers here. 3 hours is still a long time for a light to burn.
__________________
|

11-12-2009, 12:32 PM
|
 |
Enlightened
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 53
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Reading this thread has really got me missing mine. I had a guy here at work drooling over mine, so I sold it to him. I have missed it ever sence.
Paul
|

11-12-2009, 02:37 PM
|
 |
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: VA Beach.
Posts: 1,299
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
If 3 hours is not long enough for you then please make sure to carry spare batts.
__________________
|

11-12-2009, 03:28 PM
|
|
Flashaholic
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 489
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Quote:
Originally Posted by alfreddajero
If 3 hours is not long enough for you then please make sure to carry spare batts.
|
No, no. It's good enough. I was just curious what 2 eneloops would provide since OP said 3.5 hrs. on alkalines.
pmoore: You know where to get one if you miss it. I did the same thing, my co-worker was using a crappy 2AA ray-o-vac incandesent. He takes the train home because he doesn't drive. He saw my RC-N3 II and drooled all over it. For his safefy, I sold it to him at cost. He plays with it everyday at work... mostly shining in my face. lol. But since then I purchased the eagletac P100A2 because of the UI. This one (single mode) is for my gf.
|

11-12-2009, 03:45 PM
|
 |
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: VA Beach.
Posts: 1,299
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
Well according to bryan the single mode is brighter then the 2mode.....i do know that some people prefer a high and low.
__________________
|

11-12-2009, 05:36 PM
|
 |
Flashaholic*
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 新加坡
Posts: 1,703
|
|
Re: REVIEW: Shiningbeam Romisen RC-N3-Q5
+1 on that, the single mode is supposedly brighter than the RC N3 II. One more thing i observed, if you use an RCR123 (3.6v) you will not have 2 modes when carried in CR123/RCR123 configuration, its only if you use 3 volt primary CR123s that the RC N3 II has 2 modes.
On the other hand, using an RCR123 makes this little baby a pocket rocket!! It is way bright! i'd guesstimate close to 200 lumens and i got a runtime of 40+ minutes on a trustfire RCR123 before the protection circuit kicked in.
I gave my RC N3 II Q5 to my good friend's husband, he just got a new job in trucking and needs to drive back and forth across australia on a daily basis (sometimes can be away from home for a few days depending on where he needs to go) so i decided that he needed a decent light while on the road using easily available cells.
I miss that little light
__________________
有的时候不珍惜,没有的时侯决得可惜
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:32 AM.
|