Which image hosting site are you using right now?

[greenlight]

I am using both photobucket and flickr. I like the way photobucket displays the image tags, but I like the way flickr has an Uploadr program to upload multiple images. I wish flickr showed the html tags for the images in the main page, not hiding them so you have to keep clicking thru to get a bunch of tags for one group of images.

I like the multiple entry option for photobucket, but I'd like to add whole folders to save time clicking thru for each entry.

Please suggest an alternative for me to try. What features do you like best?

Thanks!

[CLHC]

I think I used the PhotonBucket once and that was it.

[carrot]

Flickr and Imageshack.us

[srvctec]

Originally Posted by greenlight

I am using both photobucket and flickr. I like the way photobucket displays the image tags, but I like the way flickr has an Uploadr program to upload multiple images. I wish flickr showed the html tags for the images in the main page, not hiding them so you have to keep clicking thru to get a bunch of tags for one group of images.

Please suggest an alternative for me to try. What features do you like best?

Thanks!

Umm, Photobucket has the ablility to upload multiple photos as well. Just click on the dropdown "Submit Multiple Images" and select how many you want to upload- up to 19 at once.

Photobucket is my favorite of all the hosting sites.

[idleprocess]

My own webhost. FTP the files and bang out the code by hand.

[Morelite]

Photobucket

[magic79]

I use www.villagephotos.com and www.starfish.com

[PhotonBoy]

I stumbled on this one lately, but haven't had a chance to check it out thoroughly:

http://www.imgspot.com/

"IMGSpot is a completely free dedicated hosting service. No need to register, no need to pay for your own server! For more information see our FAQ"

[nerdgineer]

imageshack...

[Trashman]

Photobucket. It's the only one I've ever tried. It works great, so I don't see any need to use another (not yet, at least).

[Wingerr]

I like Imageshack also because it doesn't require a log in, and has the nice thumbnail feature which allows posting of a small image that can be clicked on to load up a full size image. Much easier for the bandwidth challenged, so they're not forced to load up the full size images if they're not really interested. They don't have the same kind of limitations on bandwidth some of the other hosting sites impose, if it sees a lot of downloading activity.

[Frenchyled]

I use frenchyled.com No ads, free hosting and like idleprocess...FTP the files and bang out the coed by hands