16340 VS 18350

old4570

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
3,303
Location
Melbourne - Australia




Its nice to see larger RCR123A's [ if you can still call them that ] , anyhow I got myself a pair of 18350,s just to see what the go was . Now the 18350 is some what larger than the usual run of CR123A's :

18350 = 1.4inch long and DIA 0.72inch [ 35.56 - 18.29mm ]

This battery will not fit any of my EDC lights , but will fit 18mm bodies just fine , such as my later L2m [ 18650 ] and my UF501A lights .

These batteries cost about the same as regular 16340's and if you have a light that can handle them , then they do offer better run time and regulation .
 
I like those 18350s, Besides running 2x18350 in Solarforce L2,
I made two lights Running 18350:

This one is DD SSR-50, 1x 18350 Shorty.
http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?t=258719

This one I sold is 7 XPG runs on 3x18350:
http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?t=251539

It's not very popular, I think it'll get more use once the protected version comes out.

There was one earlier post measured 30% more capacity than 16340.
Which means one can drive up to 2.5Amp on 18350 vs 1.7 Amp 16340.
The 7XPG light I made, drive 2x18350 between 2.5 to 2.8 Amp,
It was pushing the limit that 16340 couldn't have done. I could have gone with IMR 16340 but that would have been 1/2 the run time vs. 18350.
 
I think the question here is the voltage range.

Right. While a lot of "multi voltage" drivers can work on one cell, they usually don't give the same output as with two cells; for max performance, they really need more than 3.6V.

A lot of 2xCR123A lights are bored to take 18650s as an option; but when used with 2x16340, a fair amount of space is wasted. These cells offer both higher voltage than a single 18650, and more capacity than 2x16340.

More options is more gooder. 😀
 
All of the "ChinaFires" (UltraFire, TrustFire, SpiderFire) grossly overstate their cell capacities. Real-world capacities are usually half or maybe a bit more.

Still, two 1200mAh 18350s should compare pretty well to a single *Fire 2400mAh 18650 in terms of total capacity. Which stands to reason, since the total volumes are pretty close.
 
I had estimated real 900mAh instead of chinese 1200mAh and so discharged the cell at 0.2C = 180mA using my CBA II.

The following chart shows the result.

xls18350.png




When discharged at 1A the cell delivered 823mAh.


Wulf
 
Well, I stand corrected. Thanks!!

My experience is more with the smaller cells, like 16340 and 14500. They never seem to come close to stated capacity. Has anybody done a similar comparison on those? I can't seem to find one.
 
Sorry guys - Check out Ebay , do a 18350 search , as well check out kaidomain.com , mine came from KD , and a far as I know , DX does not stock them as yet .
 
Sorry guys - Check out Ebay , do a 18350 search , as well check out kaidomain.com , mine came from KD , and a far as I know , DX does not stock them as yet .

I get mine at Battery Junction and they are back in business after their fire.
They have been great to deal with so far and are quick.
 
Has anyone tested the (newer) Trustfire 18350 protected battery? It seems to be the only protected battery in that size (and chemistry). I've been using AW 18350 IMR's but was hoping to get a little longer life...
 
Back
Top