4Sevens Maelstrom G5 *SHIPPING VERSION* Review (XP-G R5) - RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS +

i just received mine today and can tell that its gonna get a lot of use....definitely added to my 'go-to' collection. the only thing that bugs me is that the hotspot has a dark center. my Quark and Quark Turbo both have this but i never thought it was significant enough to matter...ie/can't see it in the field. the Maelstrom i received has a far more prevalent dark center in the hotspot. i won't know its affects in the field until tonight but have a feeling it will show. has anyone found measures that can alleviate this? i'm wondering if it'll help to bore open the reflector opening a little to give the emitted light more clearance. i have a lot of XP-G lights and lamps and the 47's are the only ones that have a dark spot. any suggestions at all?

You've probably already found out by now that the dark center that shows up during near-range white wall hunting is a non-issue 😀
 
You've probably already found out by now that the dark center that shows up during near-range white wall hunting is a non-issue 😀

well, yeah. like i said, i have the same issue w/ my turbo and tactical quarks but its a non-issue, especially in the field. its a lot more pronounced w/ this G5 to the point where i can shine it at the woods from any distance and see the shaded center. i'm definitely gonna keep the light but just wondered if anyone has had any success w/ correcting this on their own.:shrug:
 
well, yeah. like i said, i have the same issue w/ my turbo and tactical quarks but its a non-issue, especially in the field. its a lot more pronounced w/ this G5 to the point where i can shine it at the woods from any distance and see the shaded center. i'm definitely gonna keep the light but just wondered if anyone has had any success w/ correcting this on their own.:shrug:
I guess it may be an issue if you can see a darker center at distance. It appears that the second generation of Maelstrom's have inconsistencies in beam quality from one light to another. My initial response was based on personal experience. Mine is a first-gen Maelstrom - I can see a slightly darker center on a white wall at 1 metre, but none whatsoever at any distance further out.
 
I guess it may be an issue if you can see a darker center at distance. It appears that the second generation of Maelstrom's have inconsistencies in beam quality from one light to another. My initial response was based on personal experience. Mine is a first-gen Maelstrom - I can see a slightly darker center on a white wall at 1 metre, but none whatsoever at any distance further out.
Interesting thread.

As a general rule, all XP-G lights can show signs of the dreaded "donut" effect (i.e. relatively dark centre with brighter periphery of the hotspot). That's why I normally recommend OP reflectors for XP-G lights, as it can help smooth those out (e.g. see the comparison SMO and OP reflectors on my T20C2-II review). Of course, that would defeat the purpose of a thrower light, like the G5.

Both my G5 engineering sample and first generation G5 shipping sample had no sign of the dark centre. Sorry to hear recent shipping samples have had issues. You could try unscrewing the bezel/reflector assembly from the rest of the head to see if it helps (but I think the shipping G5s may be threadlocked). If you really find it distracting at a distance, then I recommend you contact your dealer to see about a replacement.
 
Well, l got my G5 today. No question it's a high quality light and l love the versitility it brings with the moon mode to high mode plus the other three flashing modes. It will definetly be a light that travels with me. :twothumbs
It's interesting to me, that though by specs and comparison to other lights I have (M20 Warrior and SF L2 for example) it's not really that much bigger, but it feels and looks much bigger. :shrug: Definetly not one l would pocket.
I read a comment earlier where someone said the difference between high and max was hardly noticable, man they weren't kidding. Makes me wonder what the actual output of the two modes really is. I was thinking that 200 OTF lumens for most things would be good, then to be able to jump to 350 OTF lumens when l needed more would be great, but it just isn't so. :sigh:
Does anybody have or know of someone who has tested the outputs to see what they really are? Nothing against 4Sevens, l know they are a quality and reputiple company, but these outputs just don't seem to add up. l certainly could be wrong though as l'm just using my eye and don't have equipment to measure it.
 
I bet you could see the difference between 200 & 350 lumens IF you could compare them back to back. It's almost comical when you think about it though...if you're looking at the 350 high to be able to compare it to the 200 output you first have to strobe yourself 4X! That in itself disqualifies you from comparing beam brightness.

Well, l got my G5 today. No question it's a high quality light and l love the versitility it brings with the moon mode to high mode plus the other three flashing modes. It will definetly be a light that travels with me. :twothumbs
It's interesting to me, that though by specs and comparison to other lights I have (M20 Warrior and SF L2 for example) it's not really that much bigger, but it feels and looks much bigger. :shrug: Definetly not one l would pocket.
I read a comment earlier where someone said the difference between high and max was hardly noticable, man they weren't kidding. Makes me wonder what the actual output of the two modes really is. I was thinking that 200 OTF lumens for most things would be good, then to be able to jump to 350 OTF lumens when l needed more would be great, but it just isn't so. :sigh:
Does anybody have or know of someone who has tested the outputs to see what they really are? Nothing against 4Sevens, l know they are a quality and reputiple company, but these outputs just don't seem to add up. l certainly could be wrong though as l'm just using my eye and don't have equipment to measure it.
 
I bet you could see the difference between 200 & 350 lumens IF you could compare them back to back. It's almost comical when you think about it though...if you're looking at the 350 high to be able to compare it to the 200 output you first have to strobe yourself 4X! That in itself disqualifies you from comparing beam brightness.
Actually, the currently shipping G5 lights have a revised interface where Turbo is on the main sequence. The lights now proceed as Moonlight - Med- Hi - Turbo (i.e. Lo is gone). So no more strobing needed to get to Turbo.

You should be able to see the difference Kevin - but it is not as great you might expect. I don't have a calibrated setup to measure lumens, but I would estimate Turbo is only ~50% brighter than Hi (i.e. not 75% as suggested by the reported lumen values). That's certainly enough to see the difference, but it is not that huge.

As a general rule of thumb, you would need something like ~4x the output to appear as twice as bright by eye. An extra ~0.5x the brightness will be noticeable, but not hugely so.
 
Actually, the currently shipping G5 lights have a revised interface where Turbo is on the main sequence. The lights now proceed as Moonlight - Med- Hi - Turbo (i.e. Lo is gone). So no more strobing needed to get to Turbo.

You should be able to see the difference Kevin - but it is not as great you might expect. I don't have a calibrated setup to measure lumens, but I would estimate Turbo is only ~50% brighter than Hi (i.e. not 75% as suggested by the reported lumen values). That's certainly enough to see the difference, but it is not that huge.

As a general rule of thumb, you would need something like ~4x the output to appear as twice as bright by eye. An extra ~0.5x the brightness will be noticeable, but not hugely so.
You are right, l do have the new version so Hi is next to Max, so easy to compare. I've read that that it takes much more difference in output to see a difference with your eye and that the eye just can't actually gauge it. Never the less, it still seems like you should be able to see more of a difference. Thanks for your expertiece though. I still have a lot to learn, haha. Do you have this light or have you seen the level difference first hand?
 
Do you have this light or have you seen the level difference first hand?
I don't have the new version with Turbo on the same level as Hi (which would greatly facilitate comparisons).

However, I can generally tell if my light was left in Hi or Turbo when activating from off. The difference is noticeable enough that I can be pretty confident in guessing what mode I'm in (although I may get fooled, depending on ambient lighting conditions).

Of course, I'm used to staring at a lot of lights ... 🙄
 
I don't have the new version with Turbo on the same level as Hi (which would greatly facilitate comparisons).

However, I can generally tell if my light was left in Hi or Turbo when activating from off. The difference is noticeable enough that I can be pretty confident in guessing what mode I'm in (although I may get fooled, depending on ambient lighting conditions).

Of course, I'm used to staring at a lot of lights ... 🙄
Yes, I do believe you are, haha. Thanks again for the info.
 
I am able to tell the difference between High and Max, even after strobing myself 4 times :laughing: It doesn't register as a 75% difference to my eyes though, more like a 10%.

Regarding the comments (and discussion, in the linked thread) about the dark centers in the hotspot of the beam, I paid close attention to my beam the next time I used my light, and lo and behold, there was indeed a darker center on mine ("darker" relative to the edges of the hotspot, it is still pretty darn bright there). So, based on my anecdotal evidence, the first-generation Maelstroms are also "afflicted" with the same "flaw". It never bothered me though, and I never noticed it until reading all the comments and complaints about it. Perhaps it's because I am new to flashlights, or because I am not as skilled a white wall hunter or beam observer as some of you 😗
 
Good job :thumbsup:,thanks for you helpful Review.The pics of Dereelight DBS V2 looks very beautiful
 
Well, l got my G5 today. No question it's a high quality light and l love the versitility it brings with the moon mode to high mode plus the other three flashing modes. It will definetly be a light that travels with me. :twothumbs
It's interesting to me, that though by specs and comparison to other lights I have (M20 Warrior and SF L2 for example) it's not really that much bigger, but it feels and looks much bigger. :shrug: Definetly not one l would pocket.
I read a comment earlier where someone said the difference between high and max was hardly noticable, man they weren't kidding. Makes me wonder what the actual output of the two modes really is. I was thinking that 200 OTF lumens for most things would be good, then to be able to jump to 350 OTF lumens when l needed more would be great, but it just isn't so. :sigh:
Does anybody have or know of someone who has tested the outputs to see what they really are? Nothing against 4Sevens, l know they are a quality and reputiple company, but these outputs just don't seem to add up. l certainly could be wrong though as l'm just using my eye and don't have equipment to measure it.
Well, I lied. :shakehead After three weeks of deliberating, I sent it back. I just found that I didn't use it or carry it, and I couldn't see spending that kind of money on a back up light (plus finances are low). I got an EagleTac T20C2 MKII instead and am really happy with the decision.
 
Written by Sparrow74 on 11-03-2010 01:25 PM GMT

Thx for the review - waiting for the S2 🙂
Written by offthetrail on 11-09-2010 04:07 PM GMT

Will you re-test with the new LOP reflector when it is available? I think it will help to soften the mild dark spot and may produce a little more flood but still have excellent throw.
Written by selfbuilt on 11-10-2010 08:38 AM GMT

Sparrow74 said:
Thx for the review - waiting for the S2 🙂
:welcome:

offthetrail said:
Will you re-test with the new LOP reflector when it is available? I think it will help to soften the mild dark spot and may produce a little more flood but still have excellent throw.
I don't know if 4Sevens is planning to send me a LOP reflector to compare. If they do, I'll post the shots here. But I think your presumption is correct about the hotspot - it should soften the mild dark spot in the center. Aside from that, LOP also tends to increase the corona around the hotspot (while not really affecting the more distant spill). I don't know if 4Sevens is planning to send me a LOP reflector to compare. If they do, I'll post the shots here. But I think your presumption is correct about the hotspot - it should soften the mild dark spot in the center. Aside from that, LOP also tends to increase the corona around the hotspot (while not really affecting the more distant spill).
Written by jwhite8086 on 11-26-2010 02:21 AM GMT

Hi I just recieved a G5 S2, i been reading thease forums alot but never posted.

My Supervisor at work says to me, "Your other light was better this ones got a dark spot in the middle the futher away you get the spot gets bigger so you cant see far"

he dosent know what a donut hole is but i do and i see it too .

Well after reading all about Maelstrom G5 donut holes smo/op reflectors and another thead were someone said to get max lumens take off the bezel .

I i took off the bezel and checked the beam , No dark spot I then slowly screwed on the bezel while watching the beam on a white wall , it seems to focus out the donut hole a a few turns before the bezel is tight .

i have not whent outside to check the throw with my loose bezel, can all you guys try this experiment, maybe we just need longer bezels or a little mod

Update I cant seem to duplicate what I did, thats very wiered my minds playing tricks on me
Written by rickypanecatyl on 11-28-2010 04:15 PM GMT

Selfbuilt I just read your review of the lumintop TD15 and was curious on your lux #'s. You have the lumintop at 16,750 @ 1m or just shy of the G5 here. However, in the lumintop review you list the G5's lux at only about 12,350 lux. Are the numbers different? Did the G5 loose a ton of throw? Is the Lumintop really that much better of a thrower?
Written by VF1Jskull1 on 11-29-2010 10:16 AM GMT

^^

From what I read from Selfbuilt's reviews, I think it was different due to the "ANSI" standards that was used. I could be wrong....
Written by selfbuilt on 11-29-2010 04:42 PM GMT

rickypanecatyl said:
Selfbuilt I just read your review of the lumintop TD15 and was curious on your lux #'s. You have the lumintop at 16,750 @ 1m or just shy of the G5 here. However, in the lumintop review you list the G5's lux at only about 12,350 lux. Are the numbers different? Did the G5 loose a ton of throw? Is the Lumintop really that much better of a thrower?
VF1Jskull1 said:
From what I read from Selfbuilt's reviews, I think it was different due to the "ANSI" standards that was used. I could be wrong....
Correct, I have switched to ANSI FL-1 standard for lux light meter testing. See my newer reviews for a discussion of the method, as well as Correct, I have switched to ANSI FL-1 standard for lux light meter testing. See my newer reviews for a discussion of the method, as well as http://www.sliderule.ca/FL1.htm.

Note also that raw lux at 1m is very misleading, as lux is a non-linear scale. Much better to look at "beam distance", as ANSI standards refer to it (or more simply, square-root of lux). The difference is not very great when you consider it that way. But my TD-15 sample does seem to be driven a bit harder than my G5 shipping sample.
Written by The Fred on 11-30-2010 08:18 AM GMT

Unbelievable!!!! Found the graphs and all that info very handy. Cheers!!
Written by RBH on 12-01-2010 09:01 PM GMT

Should the four contact points in the head be lubricated. If so what would you use.

Thanks
Written by NightCacher on 12-07-2010 07:38 PM GMT

Newbe here, nice post. Waiting formy G5 to arrive soon, excited yeh, but after reading the recent posts I hope my money was well spent. Still deciding what battery to use , found a 3000mAH 18650. sounds like alot of capacity and the 1500mAH lithium CR123 primaries have along runtime to if I read the graphs right. Any input would be welcomed.

I also have the quark aa2 and it is a nice EDC.
Written by VF1Jskull1 on 12-08-2010 11:58 AM GMT

RBH said:
Should the four contact points in the head be lubricated. If so what would you use.

Thanks
i would use deoxit gold. by the way thanks for asking, i gotta go do that... had it for a month and haven't put deoxit on. i would use deoxit gold. by the way thanks for asking, i gotta go do that... had it for a month and haven't put deoxit on.
Written by VF1Jskull1 on 12-08-2010 11:59 AM GMT

RBH said:
Should the four contact points in the head be lubricated. If so what would you use.

Thanks
i would use deoxit gold. by the way thanks for asking, i gotta go do that... had it for a month and haven't put deoxit on. i would use deoxit gold. by the way thanks for asking, i gotta go do that... had it for a month and haven't put deoxit on.
Written by jhc37013 on 12-16-2010 12:55 AM GMT

Got my G5 S2 yesterday and was pleasantly surprised by the extremely white tint and the lack of and major donut hole. The tint is as white as any XR-E I own it kind of reminds me of the tint from my Eagletac's that sport the XP-E R2. I'm extremely happy that their is little to no donut hole I guess I hit the lottery with more than just the tint.
 
The thread discussions have been partially restored from the search engine cache data (thank you tandem!).

The thread discussions for the last few months have been fully restored from the search engine cache data (thank you tandem!).

Please carry on! 🙂
 
Last edited:
Very nice review selfbuilt. It's what eventually convinced me to buy one (R5-2nd Gen) this past December.

Love everything about the light. Yes, I noticed the donut hole and I honestly didn't mind it in real world use. Fast forward a couple of months though, and the light is still going strong, but I just decided to buy it some goodies. Specifically the LOP reflector and I must say that it has changed the light for the better. Donut-hole is now gone and the hotspot is a lot more useable while still retaining most if not all of the throwing power.

As I bought this light to compliment my Quark AA^2 as the thrower it surprises me that I enjoy it even more that it has more flood. Can't wait till it's dark out to see how it holds up outdoors though I have a feeling I won't be dissapointed.
 
Thanks for this great review, selfbuilt!

Looking at the "beam distance to .25 lux" chart from your thread on the Thrunight Scorpion V2 with the turbo head, it looks like that flashlight only goes about 50 yards further than this one despite having nearly double the light output. I guess the Maelstrom G5 has a reflector that gives a tighter beam?
 
Looking at the "beam distance to .25 lux" chart from your thread on the Thrunight Scorpion V2 with the turbo head, it looks like that flashlight only goes about 50 yards further than this one despite having nearly double the light output. I guess the Maelstrom G5 has a reflector that gives a tighter beam?
In part, but it's really the the difference in emitters. The G5 uses the much smaller XP-G emitter. The Scorpion (and 4Sevens X7, for a closer comparable) use the much larger XM-L. Larger die emitters have lower surface brightness over their areas, making it harder to focus them to a point (i.e. a small point source is much easier to focus).
 
The G5 can now be had for $65. Considering the 10 year warranty, how do they stack up to current lights of similar form factor ?

Bruce
 
The G5 can now be had for $65. Considering the 10 year warranty, how do they stack up to current lights of similar form factor ?
It holds up reasonably well. Check out the runtimes in some of my more recent XP-G reviews to see how it compares to some more recent lights.
 
Back
Top