I have a few ideas on a new 4up MC-E bicycle light. Purely speculative. My XR-E dual 4ups are excellent and more than enough light but forget common sense - it's now an obsession! There would be a major benefit going to 16 emitters (4 MC-E): At low drive levels you are getting hugely efficient light from 16 emitters.
So will a new slug/case design be able to pull enough heat away? The case can be a bit larger than the XR-E 4up standard footprint as the new hipFlex driver is 1.4in diameter but I'd want to keep the LED footprint the same size to use the 4up XR-E optics.
Also instead of a slug/case interferance fit I would just machine out of solid rod and have the front face of the rod as the emitter interface - milling off material to leave 4 square pills on which the bare emitters would be fixed to. The wires could be routed round the channels cut (as there would be no MCPCB). Cut threads on the side and tread on a lager diameter front to hold the optics on. This would surely pull heat away faster than a slug to case fit.
Any thoughts on the matter?
Marco.
So will a new slug/case design be able to pull enough heat away? The case can be a bit larger than the XR-E 4up standard footprint as the new hipFlex driver is 1.4in diameter but I'd want to keep the LED footprint the same size to use the 4up XR-E optics.
Also instead of a slug/case interferance fit I would just machine out of solid rod and have the front face of the rod as the emitter interface - milling off material to leave 4 square pills on which the bare emitters would be fixed to. The wires could be routed round the channels cut (as there would be no MCPCB). Cut threads on the side and tread on a lager diameter front to hold the optics on. This would surely pull heat away faster than a slug to case fit.
Any thoughts on the matter?
Marco.