Adhoc/unexpected long term self-discharge test of Eneloops..

Closet_Flashaholic

Enlightened
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
299
Location
Between East and West Coasts..
So,
Last Friday I took delivery of, among other things, 16 eneloop AA batteries. I was disappointed that the date stamps of all 4 packages were 2006-09 Indicating that the batteries have been on the shelf for 20 months +/- 1 month. I chose to look at the bright side of things and see how much capacity they had after 20 months. Here are the results:

Using C9000 (original firmware rev. - whatever that was):

Group 1:
1436
1425
1433
1427

Group 2:
1415
1415
1405
1440

Group 3:
1447
1437
1414
1436

Group 4:
1454
1462
1469
1453

I am conditioning them now and if anyone is interested, I will report back the capacity after the conditioning is done. I am also checking on other ones that I have kept at 33 degrees F for 6 months and see what their capacity is.

I don't know if the store I bought them from has a huge supply of these, or whether Sanyo has a huge supply of these, or if they just aren't selling the number that they anticipated and have a huge stockpile. Does anyone have any info on this? Please don't speculate, unless you have at least some hard data to back it up.

Thanks.
 
This has been discussed numerous times before, but anyway, all the eneloops I've heard of, to date, are 2006.

Dave
 
Extra data never hurts. The consistency of those numbers is quite remarkable given the long time in storage.

I get the impression that the self discharge slows to a very slow rate indeed after about 1 year.

I have some unopened 2006-09 Eneloops myself. I did have some 2006-05 ones, but I opened and used those some time ago unfortunately.
 
These threads reference the Eneloop's date of manufacture Closet_Flashaholic:

http://www.candlepowerforums.com ... post2433392

http://www.candlepowerforums.com ... post2322060

This one references its initial capacity right out of the package:

http://www.candlepowerforums.com ... post2043113

Thanks for the info,
I guess I should have done a more thorough search before posting a new thread.. I should have known that CPFers would have addressed this ad infinitum....

Interesting threads none-the-less. I don't have a problem with the older cells as long as they keep working. I have Sanyo 1600 NiMH probably 6-7 years old that still have great capacity and have definitely paid for themselves many times over. Let's hope the eneloops are as good, over the long term.

I have been keeping some of my eneloopes in the fridge (33F) as a test just to see if the self-discharge can be lowered further. We'll see.
 
I am conditioning them now and if anyone is interested, I will report back the capacity after the conditioning is done. I am also checking on other ones that I have kept at 33 degrees F for 6 months and see what their capacity is.

I am interested to hear your results.
 
Thanks for the info,
I guess I should have done a more thorough search before posting a new thread.. I should have known that CPFers would have addressed this ad infinitum....

Um, hey Closet_Flashaholic, your right of course :), but just for the record, I wasn't harassing you for your post. Kinda looks like it when I reread my post. That was not my intention. I don't think Bones was either, just pointing out where it had been discussed. And, as Mr Happy pointed out, all information is useful.

Hey, I even learned there are 2007 eneloops! :naughty:

Dave
 
Anyone had issues with eneloops escalating in internal resistance after extended storage at full charge?

I had a set of perfectly good fully charged eneloop stored in my camera bag in a side pocket, not installed in anything and when I went to use them, they seemed dead, but had ~1.3v but very high internal resistance.
 
Top