Any danger/risk with >5 yr old Lithium Ion cells?

LuxLuthor

Flashaholic
Joined
Nov 5, 2005
Messages
10,772
Location
MS
I was just realizing that my first (unprotected) Lithium Cobalt Ion cells are from 2005 which I got to power my first FiveMega Mag85 in this thread.

I do not remember reading a discussion about any possible known safety issues, or internal degradation/short that can develop just from the aging process of these cells--beyond their decreased performance/capacity. The biggest concern is whether these could somehow develop into a thermal runaway.

I figure a number of us may have old Lithium Cobalt cells laying around, with similar issues/concerns. For that matter, I have some older laptops that likely have even older Lithium Cobalt cells.
 
Great question, Lux.


I myself have a Toshiba Portege 650 laptop, purchased in 1996.

One *Big* selling point (at the time) was its Lithium Battery !


Haven't used it for Years.

Is this something i should "worry" about ? ? ?

:eek:
_
 
Hi Lux, I have some Powerizer RCR123 LiCo cells (3.6 and 3.0 Volt) that are close to six years old. Also, I have some AW 14500 (protected/unprotected) and Protected 3 Volt LiCo cells that are exactly 5 years old. All of these cells hold better than 80% capacity 24 hrs after being charged. As far as I know, as long as they hold at least 80%, it is a sign that the internals of the cell are in healthy condition, and are safe for use.

Dave
 
Hi Lux, I have some Powerizer RCR123 LiCo cells (3.6 and 3.0 Volt) that are close to six years old. Also, I have some AW 14500 (protected/unprotected) and Protected 3 Volt LiCo cells that are exactly 5 years old. All of these cells hold better than 80% capacity 24 hrs after being charged. As far as I know, as long as they hold at least 80%, it is a sign that the internals of the cell are in healthy condition, and are safe for use.

Dave

That's a great guide...and very useful, but separately from whether an old Li-Ion holding at least 80% is healthy and safe for use, I'm really wondering if there is any known age-related hazard where in the interest of protecting my home/family it is wise/recommended to recycle Lithium Cobalt after XXX years because of something known to happen from aging.

An example is the common eventual electrolyte leakage with NiCad, Alkaline cells that sit for long times, but that is more of a local corrosion issue. My concern is heightened knowing about Lithium Cobalt fire/explosive type possibilities (which are mainly triggered by overcharging). I've just never read anything about long term Li-Co chemistry cell behavior.

I know SF gives a 10 year shelf life for their primary cells, and I have a similar question about them if I forget and have a box sit for 15-20 years, but Lithium Cobalt Ion is a different animal from that even. Lithium batteries are so ubiquitous now, you would think this question has been answered somewhere.
 
......I'm really wondering if there is any known age-related hazard where in the interest of protecting my home/family it is wise/recommended to recycle Lithium Cobalt after XXX years because of something known to happen from aging.

Well, I would think that a cell that is in some way damaged simply from aging, would likely not pass the 80% test. This seems to pretty much apply to cells that are much newer, but have been abused, or otherwise damaged. In most cases that I'm aware of, damaged cells that heat up abnormally during charge, or might be suffering from the conditions that you mention, won't hold 80% capacity. For example, a cell that is suffering from internal corrosion, is going to have diluted, or weakened electrolyte. So, from what I know, and this is just my opinion, if they pass the 80% test, I think they're good to go.

As far as SureFire's recommendation for their primary cells, I think this has more to do with the remaining capacity they have to offer, than whether they are still safe to use, or not. Primary cells with only xx percent (is it 80%?) remaining capacity are not considered usable for duty. It could very well be that at this point in the cell's degradation, that the internals have become unstable as well, not sure about that though. This is true with Li-Ions though, or at least the potential is there for instability.

At any rate, I don't think that any cell, primary, or secondary, that can demonstrate that it has 80% of it's original capacity, is likely to have much anything wrong with it, that would make it unsafe. Again, this is just my idea.

Dave
 
If you have a CBA or a way to graph the cells capacity and discharge curve, I'd do a few tests and compare them to newer cells of similar original capacity.

You may find that these older cells have greatly increased resistance causing increased voltage drop (especially at higher loads).

I wouldn't recommend pushing older cells to hard as far as the discharge rate goes. Pushing old cells hard is where the increased risk is...
 
Well part of my asking just about inherent known risks with aging is not necessarily even wanting to keep, use, or charge old cells to verify their 80% capacity if there is something that is likely to happen at some point in time. The last thing I would want to do with say a 15 year old Li-Ion cell if there is a known age-related degradation is "Hidee Hooo.....let's charge this baby up and see how she performs."

One thing I would be willing to do is just check the DMM voltage when finding an old cell, but this is more trying to find out if there is known problems that develop with age irrespective of testing it. I have never heard this discussed if there is such a problem.
 
I understand your concern, Lux. I too would like to know the answer to your question. All I know is that I've never heard this discussed either. All I know, is what I know. And, as the investment broker replied when asked how it was going, while passing by somebody at a window on the 13th floor, after jumping out the window on the 30th floor, "So far, so good!". :)

Dave
 
I can relate to this question because I have 4 of the old D size Li-ion cells from about 2005. They are 5200 mAh IIRC, and I have used them to power a 64625 using a regulator where they run at something like 9.5 Amps. Needless to say, since they are unprotected cells I have always been wary of this setup, but as the years have ticked by, it has gotten to the point that I don't want to push these old cells that hard any more. I would really not like to see what happens to 4 D size Li-Co cells overheating in a 4D Mag. :faint:

Now, if only someone would make some D size IMR cells. :poke:
 
...I'm really wondering if there is any known age-related hazard where in the interest of protecting my home/family it is wise/recommended to recycle Lithium Cobalt after XXX years because of something known to happen from aging.

Hi Lux

In general, there are no degradation mechanisms that increase the inherent risk of a fire and/or explosion in a lithium-ion cell as it ages, at least that I am aware of. This assumes, of course, that the cell is stored/used in a manner that avoids overcharge and overdischarge. I have seen some "rare" cases where a design or manufacturing defect results in a safety problem after long term storage, but these are special situations and not systemic issues for lithium-ion cells as a whole.

However, one problem to be aware of is the risk of increased self-discharge rate as the cells age. There are a variety of different ways this can happen, but the end result is that older lithium-ion cells tend to self-discharge more rapidly. So with older cells you need to watch out for this problem, as it can result in pack imbalance and increase the risk of overdischarge, especially if you leave the cells in a light for an extended period of time.
 
I have come across plenty of laptops with completely stuffed batteries, unable to run the laptop for 5 minutes without power. Considering that the same batteries could run the laptop for well over an hour when new this represents well under 20% of the original performance. I have never heard of these batteries giving any problems, in fact the only laptop batteries that I have heard of 'venting with flame' were relatively new and subject to a recall. I also have a Canon Li-ion battery for my D-SLR that I got in 2003 - it hasn't exploded yet, it just doesn't hold that much power any more.

These old batteries get tired and don't perform like they were when they were young, but I am not aware of any safety concerns due to their age. It is my belief that way less than 0.1% of Li-ion cells produced will ever give problems of the safety related kind. There must be at least hundreds of millions of Li-ion cells out there and the incident reports are few & far between.
 
I understand your concern, Lux. I too would like to know the answer to your question. All I know is that I've never heard this discussed either. All I know, is what I know. And, as the investment broker replied when asked how it was going, while passing by somebody at a window on the 13th floor, after jumping out the window on the 30th floor, "So far, so good!". :)

Dave

You made me laugh at the image of him passing the 30th floor.

Battery Guy, thanks for feedback. I wanted to share AW's response to me just now in a PM, which is very reassuring:

There are several factors resulting in the degraded performance of an aged but not abused Lithium Cobalt cell :

- oxidized electrolyte;
- worn out electrodes ( carbon layer structure collapse in -ve and un-even non dendritic plating of the +ve );
- plugging of the separator
- SEI layer increases thickness with age - increasing the cell internal impedance, reducing its capacity and hence its cycle life.
None of the above have been associated with thermal runaways, [only with] reduced performance.
 
I have come across plenty of laptops with completely stuffed batteries, unable to run the laptop for 5 minutes without power. Considering that the same batteries could run the laptop for well over an hour when new this represents well under 20% of the original performance. I have never heard of these batteries giving any problems, in fact the only laptop batteries that I have heard of 'venting with flame' were relatively new and subject to a recall. I also have a Canon Li-ion battery for my D-SLR that I got in 2003 - it hasn't exploded yet, it just doesn't hold that much power any more.

These old batteries get tired and don't perform like they were when they were young, but I am not aware of any safety concerns due to their age. It is my belief that way less than 0.1% of Li-ion cells produced will ever give problems of the safety related kind. There must be at least hundreds of millions of Li-ion cells out there and the incident reports are few & far between.

Funny thing is that if you tear apart a poorly performing laptop battery pack... you might find that most of the cells are actually in quite good shape. Not sure how the circuitry in the packs and computers work, but it's almost as if things just get out of sync... I had a laptop battery that was giving me barely 3 minutes of life, but after tearing it apart, all the batteries are totally usable and hold a charge just fine. They aren't still at full capacity, but good enough to use in single cell lights. :)
 
Battery Guy, thanks for feedback. I wanted to share AW's response to me just now in a PM, which is very reassuring:

AW's response is right on target. The degradation mechanisms that he mentions result ultimately in reduced energy and power capability. In general, as the energy storage of the cell decreases and its ability to deliver energy rapidly decreases, the risk of a safety event also decreases.

Cheers,
BG
 
Funny thing is that if you tear apart a poorly performing laptop battery pack... you might find that most of the cells are actually in quite good shape. Not sure how the circuitry in the packs and computers work, but it's almost as if things just get out of sync... I had a laptop battery that was giving me barely 3 minutes of life, but after tearing it apart, all the batteries are totally usable and hold a charge just fine. They aren't still at full capacity, but good enough to use in single cell lights. :)

*label ripping*
*hunting for screws*
14.8V/4000mAh - ahhh, 8 cells total, must be 2p4s
Torx screws, where the hell is my set of small torx drivers.

Oh well, once I get this thing apart I guess my hobby chargers are going to have some cell testing to do. I had been trying to decide whether to bother pulling this pack apart or not, it sounds like it is at least worth checking the cells to see how good they still are.

*ooh, a claw hammer - hmmm*
 
OK, I found my small torx drivers, only one driver bit missing from the set - my T6. I think that is the size I need, but the T5 has worked and I have dismantled the pack and removed the cells. Now I have 8 x 18650 unprotected cells that I am presuming are 2000mAh so my Accucell-6 and Accucell-8 are charging (I'm going with 1/2C = 1A) and once charged I'll discharge at 1A and see how much capacity I get from each cell. I'm interested to know how much capacity has been lost over the last 5 years or so of the batteries life.
 
...... In general, as the energy storage of the cell decreases and its ability to deliver energy rapidly decreases, the risk of a safety event also decreases.

Hi BG.

This part bothers me a bit. I realize your saying "In general", but this statement assumes that the cells have always been properly charged and discharged and have never (not even once) been abused in anyway.

My concern would be, what if the cell were over discharged/overcharged, or trickle charged in a manner that allowed copper shunts to form, or metallic lithium to have plated out on the anode? The effects of either of these conditions build up over time, after repeated abuse, not all at once, and can potentially cause a dead short, or violent chemical reaction internally within the cell. A cell that only retains even say, 50% of it's original capacity still would have enough potential energy to "vent with flame".

The 80% capacity rule of thumb is likely on the safe side, but may also have in mind some insurance against other possible degradation, caused by conditions other than those a cell encounters when properly maintained. Your statement suggests that Li-Ion cells are safe, regardless of their loss of original capacity. From what I've learned from SilverFox and others, is that in some situations, particularly LiCo cells, can become unstable when capacity drops below 80% of original, due to other factors not covered in AW's comments.

I realize some members are using cells that retain less than 80% of their original capacity. A lot of these cells are pulls from battery packs. These cells were likely treated in a proper manner and may be safe to use at a diminished capacity that is below 80% of original. On the other hand, loose cells used in flashlights/torches can be subjected to many adverse handling conditions outside those experienced by cells in laptop battery packs, for example.

Use of loose Li-Ion cells in flashlights is not an industrial application, as these cells were intended for. Therefore, I would suggest that cells used in this manner, should fall under stricter usage guidelines than cells in commercial packs and would suggest that the 80% rule should be followed. Better safe than sorry.:)

Dave
 
Hi BG.

This part bothers me a bit. I realize your saying "In general", but this statement assumes that the cells have always been properly charged and discharged and have never (not even once) been abused in anyway.

Correct, it assumes that the cells have never been abused. Basically, I am assuming that you, Lux, or another CPF member bought the cells new and know how to use them and store them correctly. Same could apply to cells that have never been used and have been sitting for 5+ years near room temperature between 3.6-3.8V.

All bets are off when you are talking about old cells from unknown sources. If you don't know the history of the cells or the pack, best not even bother with it.

My concern would be, what if the cell were over discharged/overcharged, or trickle charged in a manner that allowed copper shunts to form, or metallic lithium to have plated out on the anode? The effects of either of these conditions build up over time, after repeated abuse, not all at once, and can potentially cause a dead short, or violent chemical reaction internally within the cell. A cell that only retains even say, 50% of it's original capacity still would have enough potential energy to "vent with flame".

Your concerns are valid, especially with respect to the lithium plating. However, lithium plating is far, far more prevalent in prismatic and pouch cells. I rarely see it in cylindrical cells, and only when the cells have been charged at rates well above what is specified. Lithium plating does not appear to be a typical end of life failure mechanism in cylindrical lithium-ion cells, which is by far what is used most by CPF readers.

The 80% capacity rule of thumb is likely on the safe side, but may also have in mind some insurance against other possible degradation, caused by conditions other than those a cell encounters when properly maintained. Your statement suggests that Li-Ion cells are safe, regardless of their loss of original capacity. From what I've learned from SilverFox and others, is that in some situations, particularly LiCo cells, can become unstable when capacity drops below 80% of original, due to other factors not covered in AW's comments.

You are absolutely correct. I can certainly devise an abuse regimen that will make a <80% capacity lithium-ion cell far less safe than when it was new. However, my interpretation of LL's original post was that he wanted to know about inherent degradation that would occur during normal use and/or storage.

So, to set the record straight, let me be clear that just because a cell has less than 80% of its original discharge capacity does not mean that it is inherently safe. The usage (and misusage) history of the cell is very important.

I realize some members are using cells that retain less than 80% of their original capacity. A lot of these cells are pulls from battery packs. These cells were likely treated in a proper manner and may be safe to use at a diminished capacity that is below 80% of original. On the other hand, loose cells used in flashlights/torches can be subjected to many adverse handling conditions outside those experienced by cells in laptop battery packs, for example.

Yeah, I really cringe when I read posts by people who are pulling cells from used battery packs of unknown origin. I don't have much of a problem pulling cells from new packs, and indeed this is the only way to get access to certain manufacturer's cells.

Use of loose Li-Ion cells in flashlights is not an industrial application, as these cells were intended for. Therefore, I would suggest that cells used in this manner, should fall under stricter usage guidelines than cells in commercial packs and would suggest that the 80% rule should be followed. Better safe than sorry.:)

I subscribe to the better safe than sorry rule as well. And I totally agree that they should fall under the stricter usage guidelines. That is why I emphasized that older cells are more prone to self-discharge, and that one needs to keep a closer watch on them.

However, let me say this. The cells harvested from power tool and laptop computer packs are almost certainly manufactured by top tier companies, and have gone through fairly extensive testing prior to being used in that application. When you buy lithium-ion cells online, you often have no idea who the original manufacturer is or what level of quality you are getting. I can tell you from personal experience that many of the Chinese manufacturers screen and grade their cells based on capacity, self-discharge and impedance. The lowest quality cells get sold and rebranded for individual sale to distributors.

So, in a way, harvesting cells from new, unused commercial packs is a pretty good way to insure that you are getting high quality cells since there is a very good chance that those cells and that manufacturing process has been heavily scrutinized by the company whose name is printed on the pack.

I think we are both on the same page here. Hopefully I clarified some of my points.

Cheers!
BG
 
I think we are both on the same page here. Hopefully I clarified some of my points.

Yes, we are, and yes, you did. :)

......However, my interpretation of LL's original post was that he wanted to know about inherent degradation that would occur during normal use and/or storage.
This is correct. The reason I brought this matter up, is that many newcomers to using Li-Ion cells, and there are as of late many of them, may read this thread. I do not want them to get the impression that the use of old, or under performing cells is automatically OK, but rather only if certain conditions have been met. Your last post covered that quite well. :thumbsup:

Dave
 
Top