I was wondering how these two would compare in terms of light ouput. As I understand it, HID is 3-5x more efficient in terms of lumens/watt than incandescent. So Modamag's 10 (or 14?) watt MagHID's would seemingly be approaching some of the ~50 watt spotlights in brightness, but not the 100 watts of the Thor bulb.
In addition, would the supposed tight spot of the MagHID's give comparable throw to some 50-100 watt incadescent spotlights since the lumens are confined to a narrower beam?
The amount of light from the Thor is impressive but not conducive to carrying for say a couple hour night hike, not to mention that the run time on high wouldn't support it.
A (2D/8AA) MagHID on the other hand, is very carryable, with 60-90 minute run time, and it's easy to swap in another set of NiMH AA batteries.
While I wouldn't expect a 2D MagHID to be as bright or have the throw of the Thor, I'm trying to get a grasp of the relative brightnesses before I commit the $ for the MagHID. It's a lot of money for a flashlight, but a bright, handheld HID is very cool. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif
Thanks,
Matt
In addition, would the supposed tight spot of the MagHID's give comparable throw to some 50-100 watt incadescent spotlights since the lumens are confined to a narrower beam?
The amount of light from the Thor is impressive but not conducive to carrying for say a couple hour night hike, not to mention that the run time on high wouldn't support it.
A (2D/8AA) MagHID on the other hand, is very carryable, with 60-90 minute run time, and it's easy to swap in another set of NiMH AA batteries.
While I wouldn't expect a 2D MagHID to be as bright or have the throw of the Thor, I'm trying to get a grasp of the relative brightnesses before I commit the $ for the MagHID. It's a lot of money for a flashlight, but a bright, handheld HID is very cool. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif
Thanks,
Matt