Thanks Subwoofer for the great review! :thumbsup:
Today I received an ArmyTek Predator XP-G2 warm light. This is my very first experience of ArmyTek and I will share my impression. First of all: the non-slip surface is great. Not very much need of knurling here, why don't all flashlight have this?
Very nice to hold. Then I look into the reflector. It's very noticable that it's a deep reflector. And very polished. The whole light just feels reliable and as a quality instrument. After a short reading of the manual I try the light out. The tint is warm and nice. And the spill is the narrowest of all my flashlights, even narrower than Solarforce M3 head which until now was the narrowest. Actually I like it; this is good for a tactical light intended for great distance spotting. Instead of spreading light long way to the sides it results in a brighter spill. This also contributes to making this light not so uncomfortable at short distances, which is typhical for throwers because of the huge difference in lux intensity between hotspot and spill.
I did some lux comparisons by holding the Predator together with other lights at same distance(~2m). The compared lights was Fenix TK15S2, Fenix TK50, Solarforce M3 head(attached on a Surefire 9P with extender and 2x18650) and Nitecore MT40, also Fenix TK20. I didn't determine lux value at a specific distance, but just wanted to read the percentual differences compared to these lights.
When I compared all these lights I got the result that Fenix TK50 still provides the highest lux value in my collection. It's still the king of throw, especially related to the total output. But not with a huge margin. Predator warm provides very similar throw as Nitecore MT40, but slightly outthrows Solarforce M3 head. Predator warm has more than twice the hotspot lux than Fenix TK15S2. At the 190lm level(same OTF output as Fenix TK20) the hotspot lux was around 50% higher. Consequently more than 5 times the lux at the highest output.
That could be surprising that Fenix TK50 outthrows these lights when the stated lux at 1m is 31261. As well MT40 and Predator are procilamed to have at least the same or higher. My experience is that the specs for some Fenix models are underrated, however. For example Fenix E40 has 17500lux according to the specs. But there is no doubt that my Fenix E40 has 20000+ lux(earlier measured 4times of TK20). It's pretty much between TK50 and TK15S2(stated 15900lux).
The conclusion is that ArmyTek Predator XP-G2 warm is a SUPREME thrower for it's size. And the tint is beautiful, pretty similar to former Malkoff M61W(and Neutral of the newer versions sold by Oveready). Actually the beam is nice and pretty artifact free despite the smooth reflector.
One thing which dissapointed me regarding Fenix TK15S2 is that the 400lm level does not work very well with 18650. It soon starts to slowly drop. I prefer a flat output as long as possible and then instant drop to the level below.
ArmyTek Predator is claimed to have flat output until the battery is almost dead. I did a ceiling bounce comparison between Fenix TK15S2 and Armytek Predator: 2 fresh CR123/used 18650. While the both lights had full output with the CR123s(Predator warm is ~20% brighter) the TK15S2 had 80% of initial output with the 18650. Then I placed the same 18650 in the Predator: FULL OUTPUT! (~50% brighter than TK15S2 at that moment) I like that!
Conclusion: this is my first but not the last purchase of an ArmyTek. Great performance for the price. Likely I will order another within a few weeks. Propably a Barracuda XM-L2 warm!
A note: The package didn't include any description of how to make use of all the programmable functions, only a quick guide. But that's enough for me, I want it simple and am so satisfied with the default modes;
first line: of 6, 190 and 670m.
To be honest: when I read your Photobucket pictures of the advanced settings it's just too much...