[ATTN: UK Members] High Capacity AAA/AA NiMH Cell Comparison Tests

Are You from the UK?


  • Total voters
    16

TakeTheActive

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 16, 2008
Messages
830
Location
Central NJ, USA
I came across these tests today while doing a GOOGLE SEARCH for the Keywords: NiMH "Internal Resistance" charge discharge

MANY of the brand names are unfamiliar to me, but knowing the GLOBAL community that visits the CPF 'Batteries Included' Forum (at least for those members that take the time to add their LOCATION to their PROFILE :poke:), I thought that the folks from Europe might get a kick out of them :buddies: :wave:.

BTW, seeing the names Energizer and La Crosse near the top of *ANY* list was a SHOCKER for me. :eek:

Brands (in alphabetical order):
AAA: DVD-Recordable.Org: High Capacity (GE 1000mAh) AAA NiMH Cell Comparison

  1. Battech
  2. BB
  3. BTY
  4. Duracell
  5. ENCORE
  6. Energizer
  7. FUJICELL
  8. GP
  9. La Crosse
  10. MAXUSS
  11. palocell
  12. POWERCELL
  13. PROFITEXX
  14. Unbranded POWER
  15. Vapextech
AA: DVD-Recordable.Org: High Capacity (GE 2500mAh) AA NiMH Cell Comparison (results so far)

  1. DURACELL
  2. Energizer
  3. EXTREME
  4. FAMEART
  5. FUJICELL
  6. Intec
  7. La Crosse
  8. MAPLIN
  9. Unbranded BLUE/GREY
  10. UNIROSS
  11. Vapextech
Looking forward to the UK discussion... :popcorn:
 
...MANY of the brand names are unfamiliar to me...Looking forward to the UK discussion... :popcorn:
Nice link...I guess Canada might loosely be termed the UK. I've bought my share of no-name NiMH batteries and for the most part they suffer from poor performance in digital cameras. This is a combination of lower capacity and/or high voltage drops due to internal resistance. This seems to be especially true of high capacity NiMh cells and the UK link backs this up by showing actual capacities often being lower than 50% of the state value...an explanation:

The high leakages lead to the cells discharging below 0.9V and permanently damaging the battery. For the general population with less sophisticated chargers (i.e. no forming/discharge functions), this can only lead to a bad experience.
The newer LSD cells solve the issue by having much longer shelf life and statistically subjecting the battery to much less of the damaging "discharged to less than 0.9V" state than conventional batteries. Witness a test by Stefan on nine LSD batteries which all gave more than 89% (1781 mAh) of their claimed 2000 mAh rating.
 
Top