Battery construction details & History of the USL

js

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 2, 2003
Messages
5,793
Location
Upstate New York
Bill gave me permission to reveal the details of my contribution to the USL: battery pack construction and design.

For now, there are no pictures, but I will be taking some over the next few days and will add them to this thread.

OK. So, to start with, for those not familiar with light design in this power range I wanted to mention that building an Aurora class light involves problems not normally at issue in a SuperBulb incan mod. You can get a much more comprehensive understanding of these things by reading Ginseng's Aurora thread and the threads of the people whom he credits in that thread and also the link which can be found in his sig line. But for an overview, here are a few of the more prominent issues:

1. Heat. No plastics need apply. No solder joints too close to the lamp will stay solid. No hot glue will keep its grip on the battery pack. In so many ways, on so many levels, heat considerations dictate the design.

2. Current. 8+ amps is a whopping rush of electrons, and few switches are up to the task, but more importantly, thin resistance welded bands of metal are no longer able to adequately electrically join batteries together. They WILL work, but will also add a non-trivial amount of resistance.

3. Batteries. This sort of goes with no. 2 above. Very few cells that are relatively small in size will deliver 8 or 9 amps and hold a decent voltage. Cells this potent are rare and must be specifically and specially manufactured.

4. Space. This ties in with all of the above. Trying to find batteries that will handle 8 amps and then joining them together all while observing proper safe distance from the heat source is difficult. Many, many factors must be balanced against each other.

5. Cost. Sure, you can have a custom body machined around everything else, but it will drive your costs through the roof unless you are doing a run of hundreds. Plus, chances are the first proto-type will have problems and won't work, which will mean another, and the proto-types are the expensive elements.

And then, of course, there are all the usual issues that go with incan light design, such as matching the battery pack to the lamp, and finding a way to hold the lamp in position, and so on.

To get a feel for the USL pack, and the key idea behind it, grab a Mag D sized light, if you have one, and then remove the switch core and head. Now take four AA alkaline batteries and push them into the back of the light. You will see that they just fit in a square or diamond shape formation. In fact, orient them so that the points of the square are top and bottom and left and right. Now remove the top battery and let the other three slide all the way to the snap ring, directly underneath the round switch opening. If you look in from the front of the light, you will see that there is a good bit of room from the round switch opening to the top of the bottom most battery. Room for a switch of the right design.

This is the essential feature of the USL battery pack design. It is simply four stacks of three AA's with one missing AA in the top stack. That is the positive battery pack terminal. Then at the back of the light there is a jumper to the leftmost stack (looking in from the back of the light). Then there is a jumper from the front end of that stack to the bottom stack, and then a jumper from the back end of the bottom stack to the rightmost stack, and thus the negative pack terminal is at the front of the rightmost stack.

SOME CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

The USL pack is made from 11 www.cheapbatterypacks.com 1650 mAh AA NiMH batteries. In my initial testing these cells held better than 1.1 volts/cell at 8.3 to 8.5 amps, or 12.1 to 12.3 volts or better for the pack. These are the best high-current AA cells available: as good as KAN 1800 4/5A's but with a bit less capacity. These cells are the main reason that the USL is a reality and not just an idea, although the KAN 1300 AA's would have been able to handle this current as well.

Now, unfortunately, the CBP 1650's are just a bit larger than, say, a Duracell or a Ray-O-Vac, and thus the Mag body needs to be bored out a small amount. Not enough to touch the threads, however, and not enough to impair the structural integrity of the light. OK, since that is not my problem, I will move on.

So, since the batteries cannot be resistance welded together for an 8 amp draw, they must be end-to-end soldered. This is a tricky operation and involves a lot of work to prepare the surfaces of the + and - contacts, then tin them, then heat up both solder puddles at once and push them together before they cool, joining them over the entire surface of the smallest contact in a minimally thick layer of solder.

I have covered the details of this operation in my TigerLight Custom Batterypack construction details thread. Anyone who is determined enough can master it, but it is a skill which takes time and practice to develope. And in the case of the USL, it is a skill which is actually necessary for the best battery pack performance. I am not the only person on CPF who can end-to-end solder batteries. Ginseng and Tweek can also do this, and there are probably others. Also, scads of people on www.rcgroups.com end-to-end solder their battery packs because they are asking them to deliver 20 or 30 amps.

After end-to-end soldering and taping and/or wrapping, the stacks are glued together using GE RTV 108 silicone adhesive and sealant. Why this and not something else? Why this, which I heard someone laughingly refer to as bathroom caulk? Simple: it is flexible and resilient and very very tenacious and strong, while at the same time being capable of withstanding very high temperatures.

Next the electrical connections are made bewteen stacks with 25 amp tinned copper braid, soldered directly to the battery contacts.

And finally, two high strand count silicone jacketed 20 gauge wires are threaded through the center of the pack and soldered to the + and - contacts at one end of the wires. At the other, a Molex micro-fit connector is attached for the charging connection, and the connector at the end of the pack resides in the space of the tail cap and the end of the mag body, since no mag spring is needed to carry current to a ground return path through the body of the light.

A 16 gauge wire is soldered to the + contact and then to one of the switch leads. Then one of the socket wires is soldered to the other switch lead, while the other socket wire is soldered directly to the - battery contact.

So as you can see, there are negligibly small amounts of resistance in the batteries and wiring and switch, which is important in a high current, high powered light. Thus, almost every bit of juice that the batteries have gets to the lamp. And what a lamp it is--but I'll leave that for someone else to tell.

I hope you guys like your USL's. Thanks, Bill, for taking on this MONUMENTAL task. I have it easy. All I have to do is build (gulp) 60 plus battery packs. hehe.
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

Awesome.

So, if I understand you correctly, all the cells are connected in series? Electrically equivalent to connecting all eleven cells nose to tail? (What cool light that would be. You could call it the Light Saber!)

You make 4 "stacks" of cells, then flip two of the stacks end for end so that you can attach pos-to-neg jumpers on the ends of the stacks?

You mention that these batteries are capable of 20 amps. Does that mean that, theoretically, you could power a 200W bulb off this pack? I'm not suggesting this would be a wise or prudent thing to do, I'm just wondering. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif Would your solder and wiring survive the experiance?

Mmmm, 7000 lumens. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif

-Dave
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

Dave,

Yup. You got it.

And yes, this battery pack would deliver 20 amps, or even more. Past 25 amps continuous the copper braid would start to overheat, but not as fast as the batteries would run out of charge. hehe.

As for 200W (or 250 W *cough* = 10,000 lumens) these lamps in GY6.35 configurations don't require more current, just more voltage. Which means more cells in series. Like 19, for example. Check out the Ken4, for instance.
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

It's a damn shame stuff like this is so far out of my price range. I mean even if I had the light, I couldn't afford a charger.

Lucky for me, I'm not likely to ever encounter one of these in person!

And also luckily for me, I have bulbs and other stuff coming for the poormans handheld sun, the M*gBP85!

Y'all are some lucky mothers to play at this level!
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

[ QUOTE ]
At some point I'd like to see some discussion about the care and feeding of this pack. Stuff like how fast to charge it, how often, storage tips, dangers, stuff like that. I'm sure such knowledge is old hat to many here, but not me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not a problem.

Given that the USL will be sold with a smart charger, there aren't as many provisos and warnings. NiMH don't like to be on continuous slow charge, once they've reached peak, but a peak charger stops at--drum roll please--peak, so no issue there.

I'd say the following for now about the USL w/ Hitec CG-340 charger:

1. Don't charge a pack that was just charged in the last day or so (and has just been sitting idle). Discharge it somewhat before charging again.

2. Charge at least once every couple months.

3. Keep an eye on the pack/light while it is charging, just in case. If the battery pack starts to get HOT (and not just warm), stop the charging.

4. Feel free to charge at the maximum 1.5 amp rate. These batteries will handle that no problem.

5. Don't turn the light on while charging (!)

These are just preliminary points. I'm sure that Bill will provide instructions with the USL, including charging instructions.

But, I almost forgot the most important point:

6. When runnning the light TURN OFF BEFORE THE LIGHT STARTS TO DIM UP RAPIDLY! and never, ever discharge the light unattended. It could start a fire in the worst case, and in the best case, you will ruin the battery pack once it gets drawn down past .4 volts/cell. Never over-discharge a NiMH pack.
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

Hi Jim,

It's great to know you're the "brains" behind the pack construction!!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/bowdown.gif Thank you for sharing the IP and in doing so, for being for being in the original spirit of CPF!

Larry
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

Larry,

It's great to be able to work with someone like bwaites, and it's great to rub elbows with some REALLY great, such a yourself. I am in awe of your accomplishments, quite frankly.

BTW, what does "IP" stand for in the "Thank you for sharing the IP"? Oh, wait, does that mean "intellectual property"?

Well, if so, heck yeah! I didn't do much in this arena compared to, for example, Ginseng or Kenshiro, and besides, Bill was the one with the active Aurora class light project best able to utilize the battery pack/switch configuration design.
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

Jim,
You said feel free to charge at 1.5 amps, because the batteries will take it. I thought the current (no pun intended) thinking was that batteries would last longer if charged at lower overall rates. Your thoughts please.
Harry
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

Well,

Jim has done a great job explaining the pack construction and power plant of the USL.

Because there have been so many questions and we are close to launch on this, I'll try to give a little historical perspective and insight into the thought processes and development of this light. Along with that I'll give a little personal history also.

About 2 years ago, as my brother in law prepared to ship out to Baghdad, we discussed what he had felt was needed to give him any edge there. Having served in Gulf War I, he mentioned 2 areas that he felt he personally wanted better prep and equipment than what he went with the first go around.

1) A better personal knife. He flat didn't like the available military options and wanted a folder easily opened with one hand and closed with one hand that would stay locked in both positions. The most cost effective answer was the CRKT Blade Lock and it has served him well. Given more time, I found the Benchmade Axis Lock system knives and would probably recommend one of these now.

2. A personal illumination tool that worked, first time, every time.

After lurking on CPF for quite a while, I settled on the red Inova X5T, and the Surefire A2/Streamlight TTL2. As he is a mechanic and electrician, I presented all three and let him choose. He took the Inova and the A2. My sons own TTL2's and they have been perfect lights for juveniles. The A2 and Inova have served perfectly in Iraq, with dozens of batteries used and no lamp replacements in the A2. In addition, I sent him with a Pelican M6 with pressure switch mounted on his A4 M16, since his unit was told that not all forces could be issued weaponlights and it was all that was available before he shipped out. It has been carried extensively and has required only one bulb replacement itself.

After Ed had some experience with the A2, he became even more enthusiastic and I purchased one for myself. I've felt ever since that it is the culmination of a small incandescent light, with the bonus of long runtime, low output LED's.

The introduction of high quality lights led to the awakening of the tinkerer in me that had slumbered since I left RC racing more than a decade ago. Consequently, I began to examine the many lights available and tried to make decisions about the best options.

I soon found high output LED's, and thinking they were "IT", I purchased several LED lights, initially a MrBulk SpaceNeedleII, then an L2, then many others. Currently I have 2 SNII's, 2 SL M6LED's, a MrBulk VIP with options, a MrBulk LiOnHeart, an Inova X5T, multiple sandwich based MiniMags, and I'm waiting on an inquiry about an L4. One of my SNII's has a diffusing lens, making perhaps the most even flood light in flashlight existance.

No one could accuse me of hotwire bias at that point!

However, I noticed then, and continue to be plagued by, the obvious color problems associated with LED's. The poor color rendition of LED's under ambient light conditions leaves a lot to be desired in my view.

As such, I began exploring more incandescent options. Already in love with the perfect incandescent beam of the A2, I began attempting to step up the power, but still get that beautiful, white beam.

I ran across Wilkey's (CPF name Ginseng) experiments with the WelchAllyn lamps and then his development of the Aurora and became intrigued. We conversed, and he initially was going to bring a commercial version of the Aurora to market here on CPF, but that was aborted by his return to school to finish his doctorate.

The Aurora, the first Mega Output (3000+ lumens), incandescent in a Mag style body was, and remains, the inspiration for all of the work I have done. Wilkey had originally agreed to allow me to actually use his Aurora name, but after many changes and abandoning the MagLite host, I decided to leave the Aurora designation as the progenitor to it all and rename my version.

At that point, and after all of his research, I was reluctant to allow the project to die, but personally did not have the experience or knowledge to attempt the project myself.

With Wilkey's encouragement, I spent hours, and then days, reading about hotwires, batteries, lamps, reflectors and previous experiments. Wilkeys, Otokoyamas Perfect Mag Reflector project, Jim Sextons TigerLight mods, and many others were read and then reread as I teased out what had been tried and worked, what had been tried and didn't work, and what had been tried and then set aside for future possibilities.

I decided that in order to use the same A type cells that the Aurora used, a new body must be designed and engineered, since the boring Wilkey had used required a new end cap solution and made the body fairly thin. Two different, rough, prototypes were made, the "MULE" and the "FAT MULE", with several bodies based on the "Mule" actually being built. One of those is actively used by the machinist who built them, 2 I still own, and Wilkey has the 4th.

One of the problems that developed, however, was that the runtime of 15-20 minutes allowed the body to become incredibly hot. Hot enough to burn skin instantly, hot enough to cook eggs, hot enough to almost start fires, which the beam could already do, as I found out one day when I set the light bezel down to insert the battery. Not realizing it was on, I left it sitting while I grabbed my briefcase, only to see smoke curling up from the newspaper under the bezel! It had been sitting for less than 20 seconds, but had burned through 6 pages of newsprint.

The heat issue became a major problem, as I became more and more concerned with the ramifications of a light that could start fires with its beam and burn skin on contact! My wife, brilliant woman that she is, pointed out that in my profession I constantly rail against the burns caused by curling irons, (the number 1 cause of ER visits for burns of children in most studies) and yet I was propagating the possibility of burns from something that most people wouldn't even recognize as a danger!

That was a very sobering thought, and in combination with my two sons football season, and then my oldest son's experiences while being recruited by various college football programs, I slowed down development significantly as I attempted to reconcile the dangers and problems of heat management.

By this time I had about 300 hours of development time over 6 months, and a couple thousand dollars invested into different options, most of which were dead ends. That doesn't begin to count all the time Wilkey and others saved me by telling me about their personal experimental dead ends and problems!

That will do it for Part One!

Part Two a little later!

Bill
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

Starlight,

As far as I know, this is true, but 1.5 amps is still under a 1C charge rate, which is generally accepted as a standard rate for high rate cells according to what I've read.

Everyone else,

Bill will be adding a "History" section to this thread.

And I will be editing the inital post to add pictures and to soften the somewhat overbearing and self-important tone. I posted this all in one go without the benefit of re-writes and revisions, and it shows. Please forgive the arrogance. With some luck I will re-work and improve this thread tomorrow.
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

Bill,

Great post. I look forward to part 2!

I have done some initial editing to *ahem* improve the tone and color of my post, and to stick to the objective: explaining the USL pack for fun and information.

Again, I'm sorry, and I hope it is now a tolerable read. Back with pictures at some point.
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

Part 2

So as I pondered the heat issue, two thoughts came to me and then several people asked about one of them.

What if I used a regulator of some type to shut the light off when it reached a dangerous temp, or at certain time?

I tinkered with the idea for a while, and then recognized that if I could set the timer, someone else could unset it!

That wouldn't work!

I then basically was stumped. I wanted to build the light, but I NEVER wanted to have to talk to a mother whose 2 year old daughter had grabbed the flashlight and burned her hand, or worse yet, had jumped in Daddy's lap to hug daddy and laid her face against the hot bezel and burned her face while he tried to keep it out of the way without burning himself!

And then a good friend and fellow designer, Jim Sexton, who I had talked to about using regulation as he worked on a regulated Surefire M6 pack, approached me with a brilliant idea.

Realizing that the heat idea was really cramping my design, he asked something like, "Why don't you just limit runtime by using a battery that won't allow long enough run time to cause the heat buildup in the body to become an issue?"

The problem was, that cell didn't really exist at the time I began all the MULE prototype work. A sized cells, or either 4/5A or 5/4A cells, were the smallest true high current cells available. In the meantime, though, some new cells had become available, and I had heard of them, but didn't have any experience with them yet.

And then Jim dropped the real bomb, "Why don't you build the light in a 2D Mag body?" I asked him how that would be possible and he said, "Use 11 CBP 1650 AA cells, get rid of the Mag switch core, and use a high current rocker switch like Wilkey did in the Aurora."

Eureka, the game was back on!!!

Jim volunteered to build the packs, and even design a dedicated charger if I would come up with the rest of the package. He also felt that the ring potting scheme he had employed so successfully in the TigerLight mods might be an answer here as well. He even knew of a rocker switch that might work, and found it.

The project was back on, and not just an Aurora clone, or something in a bigger body, but a completely re-engineered and re-thought light.

3000 plus lumens in a 2D sized light! A handheld sun!

Now we are 60 days later and the light is close to manufacture. The bugs are mostly worked out, at least the ones Jim and I can find, and now Modamag is working on the ones he can find!

In 2-3 weeks the field testers will have their say, and them we'll go to work to hammer these out and get them out to all the people anxiously awaiting them.

The ring potting scheme has been abandoned, in favor of a sliding can socket mount, but otherwise the USL is near fruition.

The remaining bugs with the charging system components will be worked out shortly, since we abandoned the dedicated charger idea for a time tried and proven design, but still have to find power supplies for all the worlds divergent power systems.

A larger 3" head which would allow the use of some different bulbs, is being studied by Otokoyama, and may be available at a later date.

End of Part 2

Part 3 "Why did Bill choose these parts?" this weekend!

Bill
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

Coming soon:

"Secrets of the USL - The Definitive Coffee Table Edition", B.Waites, W.Wong, J.Sexton, Et.Al


Seriously that was an awesome read! I've been amazed by the Aurora since I first started showing up around here but never really imagined it would be even possible for me to own one of those fantastic lights. The amount of engineering that has gone into the USL is simply incredible and not something I'd try to duplicate. My initial guess was that the USL used 2/3A GP high rate NiMH cells, but that was just a wild guess and it was off.

More than that, it's a worthy challenger to the Surefire Beast in terms of output, formfactor AND rarity - only 85 available for civilian sale, well, the USL - only 60 available for CPF-only sale.... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif

It will truly be an honor to be the custodian of such an incredible light. Something tells me I made the right call to 'just buy it' /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

KevinL,

Just wait for the pictures, a good coffee table book has to have pictures!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/hahaha.gif

As I have worked on the USL, I have been amazed that so many people have contributed in so many ways. Many haven't done it directly on the USL, but have helped with other of my projects, simplifying them so I could concentrate on the vagaries of the USL or have offered to assist in other ways so I could financially keep the ball rolling on the USL.

No one has said, "I'm not going to help", "You're nuts, figure it out yourself" or really anything negative at all.

Many people, including KevinL, JS Burley, Cue003, and others have extended a hand just for my asking and have helped either with direct help or with allowing me materials to complete other projects while working on the USL.

Thanks to all of you, both the named and unnamed!!

Bill
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

This is fascinating read. I've been taking notes as I read /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

ernest
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

Wow,

This provides me with a lot more perspective than I had previously. Excellent writeup Bill. Thanks for sharing your trials and trevails. We remain behind you in support of this project which has become truly your own, unique contribution to the knowledge base. I'm not shining you on when I say you've made your place in CPF history.

Keep it rocking!

Wilkey
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

Part 3 or "Why did Bill choose THESE parts?"

After several episodes of engineering and then re-engineering the MULE body and it's variations, I was excited that a stock MagLite body might be used as the basis for the USL.

For those of you who haven't designed a flashlight body and tried to have it manufactured, or at least those of you who aren't product development engineers, it is a nightmare of one problem after another!

Just a few: What kind of threading, metric or standard, do you need Orings, where do the Orings go, what are the Oring tolerances, what are the Orings made of? How fine a pitch for the threads, inside or outside tailcap, standard or reverse threads, backwards compatible with a Mag? And so on and so on, ad infinitum!

People criticize Maglite for not changing their products, but after my experience, I am amazed at how well they did it in the first place, because after all these years, their product still works and has had only minimal production driven changes. That is more a testament to their front end engineering than anything else, in my view. As my southern born and bred father taught me, "If it ain't broke son, why are you trying to fix it?"

The 2D MagLite body is perhaps, along with the 3D body, the most widely sold and used light in history. Ask most people today what a flashlight looks like, and they describe a Maglite, and generally a BLACK Maglite! Older people will remember the chrome Ray-o-Vacs, but for the last decade, at least, a flashlight has become almost synonomous with a MagLite.

The 2D, with a switch almost the same size as a D cell, is a well proportioned light, but that large switch body takes up lots of "engine" room, and if we wanted to install a "Big Block" light engine, it had to go.

Once the 2D was decided on, and the switch discarded, and since we had already settled on the high current CBP AA's, we had to make sure they fit. Initially, we thought that the CBP's might just fit, since only the fat body, longer run time 2200-2500 AA's seemed to have a problem in the 4AA square configuarations. But the 1650 is a HIGH CURRENT AA and they are also a little fat. A very slight boring of the body, to the level of the threads, but not affecting them, allows a 4 square configuration.

So now we had the body and the engine. But how would we handle the power that the "big block" could put out? The Mag Switch, which uses the entire Mag body as the return path, functions reasonably well, and in fact, I had done extensive testing with it in the MULE prototypes and found that it was capable of handling the current of the high power lights, albeit at some loss due to resistance. Since it would no longer fit with the high current 11 pack of cells, though, we needed a high current, stout switch. There were 2 options. The Cherry manufactured switch used by Wilkey in the Aurora and a similar switch that Jim Sexton had located. There was no real advantage of one over the other except that the switch Jim found does have a water resistant boot which may be optional. The "ignition" switch discovered by Jim is a very nice unit rated at 16A at 125 volts. It has a very positive engagement, smooths out even more as it is used, and fits very nicely in a modified Mag body tube. For those concerned with the "square peg/round hole" look of the prototype, I believe that we have resolved that issue at this point and will have a field test unit with the new look available in the next week or so!

With the body, engine, and switch found, the development of the actual lamp portion of the light was next!

It will be covered in Part 4 or "We have light and ************ is it bright!"

Bill
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

Part 4 or "We have light and ************ is it bright!"

With the Body, engine, and ignition path configured, we now had to deal with the lamp/mounting portion of the light.

Wilkey (Ginseng) once again proved himself a true gentleman and stepped up to help with the choice of lamps through his in depth research. The lamps, chosen after extensive testing by Wilkey in the Aurora, and then by myself in the MULE prototypes, are high output specialty lamps produced by Osram of Germany. There is a wide selection of 12 volt lamps, of both transverse and axial filament designs that come in bipin and other configurations available from Osram and some may wish to experiment, especially with the 3 inch head.

The lamp chosen for the USL is a true 12 volt lamp which is very white at 12 volts and tolerates minimal overdrive. However, it is robust at 12 volts and I have managed to pop one only by overdriving. I have 3 lamps with more than 20 hours on each, (that's tough to do when you have only 12-20 minutes of run time on a battery pack, by the way! I connected 2 of them to a power supply and cheated a little!). I have had NO lamp failures under normal use, so I suspect that these lamps will last years under the type of use the USL will get. (Each USL will come with 2 bulbs, however.) This lamp produces 3-4000 lumens at 12 volts and is VERY slightly overdriven, so expect brightness beyond anything you have experienced in a light this size!

It is bright beyond bright, and the axial filament gives a beautiful round hot spot. Depending on which reflector is used, it has some smooth circular ringing, but it is noticable in the white wall test, but not outside.

Initially Jim and I thought that ring potting the lamps, using his ring potting scheme from the Tiger Light on a grander scale, and then placing them into customized Carley reflectors at the point of best focus would work the best.

After further testing once I had the prototype USL, though, I decided that the mounting system used in the MULE protos was simpler and more cost and time efficient. One of the recent changes which has slowed the pricing involves that adjustment.

The socket used is a high output 240 volt/20 amp ceramic socket capable of enduring the incredible heat manufactured by these lamps. It is mounted to an aluminum heat sink, mounted within the neck of the body, and will be connected thermally to the body with thermal grease.

The final pieces then are the custom ordered and designed Carley reflectors, and the heat resistant lenses from Flashlightlens.com. The Carley's will be custom ordered with appropriate neck sizing to allow passage of the stock bulb, but may have to be opened up a little if another optional bulb is used.

I do have concerns about Carley being able to deliver on time, and so the first parts ordered will be the Carleys and the batteries, which must arrive by surface ship from the Far East.

So there it is, the history and trials of the USL!!

Bill
 
Re: Construction secrets of the USL: why it\'s so g

Wow!

Wilkey
 
Top