- Joined
- Feb 2, 2006
- Messages
- 1,154
Being a noob in electronics and engineering etc., I've been having difficulties understanding the specificiations of the BBNG board for years:
http://theledguy.chainreactionweb.com/product_info.php?cPath=48_49_61&products_id=730
My questions are:
a. What does it mean by "safe mode?"
b. For NG750/1000 what does it mean by "critical starting voltage?" I understand that BBNG is for primary/NiMH cells only, so in the case of 2xAA config, which of these cells do achieve an initial VIn of ~3.4V?
c. Why can't the BBNG be used with Li-Ions?
d. Under what circumstances does the BBNG achieve better efficiency than the (invincible) GD when used with primaries/NiMHs?
e. Provided that the LE has adequete heatsinking, can an NG1000 drive an SSC P4 effectively in a 2xAA config without overheating (ie. achieving "angry blue" on emitter die)?
f. If NG is the improved BB, then why do the BB and BBNG boards still co-exist?
http://theledguy.chainreactionweb.com/product_info.php?cPath=48_49_61&products_id=730
My questions are:
a. What does it mean by "safe mode?"
b. For NG750/1000 what does it mean by "critical starting voltage?" I understand that BBNG is for primary/NiMH cells only, so in the case of 2xAA config, which of these cells do achieve an initial VIn of ~3.4V?
c. Why can't the BBNG be used with Li-Ions?
d. Under what circumstances does the BBNG achieve better efficiency than the (invincible) GD when used with primaries/NiMHs?
e. Provided that the LE has adequete heatsinking, can an NG1000 drive an SSC P4 effectively in a 2xAA config without overheating (ie. achieving "angry blue" on emitter die)?
f. If NG is the improved BB, then why do the BB and BBNG boards still co-exist?