Beamshots of both m25c2vn Turbo versions and my other vn throwers

Alex1234

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
4,003
Location
Bear Delaware
The VN thrower battle is here.


257d6ecc-1549-47f3-a386-62bc515d4438_zpscrrgxkwy.jpg


Beamshot order

1)s200c2vn Xpg2 pdtc
170kcd
2)m25c2vn xpg2 pdtc fiat lux
343kcd
3)m25c2vn Turbo xml2 u3 pdtc
580kcd
4)m25c2vn Turbo xpg2 pdtc fiat lux
775kcd
5)tk61vn50
460kcd



eefec3cd-b967-4e76-a4ad-00c2aadbd508_zpssjplvyo5.jpg
39a81354-4e8d-4efa-8a04-1fe091e25c1c_zpsd2n8fjr9.jpg

831511e6-de19-46ea-b031-d47c478641d2_zpsdcwqdfj1.jpg
81852507-f3d4-4f51-8169-19bdf3129f74_zps6bgaaau8.jpg

ee3b01e6-39ec-4b7c-8f93-6faa19f9d1f1_zps54xv56m1.jpg
 
Last edited:
When you realize 170 ish kcd is the lowest of them all it really sinks in how far led tech has come over the last 6 years or so and how good vinh is a modding
 
Thanks for those Alex. Do you have a favorite yet between xml2 or xpg2 in MX25c2vn Turbo? Or is it too early to tell?
 
Xml2 is more useable but xpg2 is just insane. The tint is much cooler and its like the xml2 beam squeased together about 30% more
 
Nice pictures. Weird how there seems to be a more noticeable difference between the xml2 m25c2vn vs the tk61vn50
which is only a 120kcd difference. But when comparing both versions of the m25c2vn, there's not much difference and that's with a 195 kcd difference
 
Nice pictures. Weird how there seems to be a more noticeable difference between the xml2 m25c2vn vs the tk61vn50
which is only a 120kcd difference. But when comparing both versions of the m25c2vn, there's not much difference and that's with a 195 kcd difference

Trust me in person the difference between both versions is greater then the beamshots indicate.
 
Top