Best replacement for EagleTac T20C2 Mk II (+ free review)

rickypanecatyl

Enlightened
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
915
I just got a T20C2 Mk II and loved it. It quickly became my favourite "all around" light. Being the nice guy I am though, I gave it to a friend and am looking for another all around light. I may just get the same one, but was curious what else there was out there to try. Here's my pro's and con's on the Mk II.

Pros:
- I love the efficiency of the light! Nearly 2 hours at 300 lumens and over 100 hours at about 15 lumens. (I know the specs say something like 5 lumens – but I'm sure the low is at least 15 – much, much brighter than my 10 lumen Streamlight Nano.
- I love the 3 light levels. Basically multiples of 5 – 300/60/12. They are far enough apart that you can tell you've dropped a level but the truth is, there isn't a HUGE visible difference between 300 and 60; I could never imagine anyone saying, "You know 300 is just too bright for what I want right now, but 60 just isn't bright enough. I wish there was something in between."
- Durability. I dropped it several times with no bad effects. Threads fill tight and strong. I think it may have to do with the Stainless steel bezel on one end and the rubber tail stand adapter on the other end.
- Rubber tail stand helper. By itself this light can't tail stand, but it comes with a rubber sleeve that allows it to tail stand, and I love that little guy. It really does 3 things:
o Allows it to tail stand
o Probably is very helpful for when/if you drop it giving it some "shock absorbtion."
o I found with that rubber cap on the end it made it real easy to hold the light in my teeth when I needed both hands.

Cons:
- Its real floody. For an "all around" light I don't want a laser beam thrower, but I wouldn't mind it being a bit tighter than it is. I'm too new to this and don't really understand the lux to lumen ratio for beam shape. I'm pretty simple and like those MR16 bulbs you can buy that tell you on the box what the beam angle is. I'm going to guess that the beam angle of the Mark II is about 100 degrees where as from the pics I've seen, the DBS R2 with aspherics looks like about a 5 degree angle. All that to say, that my personal, ideal choice for my "all around" light would have about a 75 degree angle if the Mk II is 100 and the DBS R2 Aspheric was 5.
- The beam of the MK II has a slight "ring within a ring" syndrome. I don't think this would be hard to solve though as I have the smooth reflector and I've hear the OP doesn't lose much throw.
- It's a bit hard to access the low mode. If I could have any UI it would be the selector type technology on the Fenix TA or Jet beam RRT's. You can turn the light on in Medium mode with a loose head, or high mode with a tight head. However to access low you have to go back and forth between medium and high a few times (can't remember but the process is a bit different if you've started in medium vs high). Personally I like several modes but the 2 I like the quickest, easiest access to are the lowest low and highest high. If I need a blinding light, show and awe all of a sudden I want it to come on in high. If I grab it off the nightstand in the dark and don't want to bother my wife/wreck my night vision I want to be able to have it come on in the lowest mode. Medium mode or SOS I don't mind turning it on and having to fart around with it a bit to get that to work.
- I sure wouldn't mind one more low mode. Like I said, I think the low is really 15 lumens and I do like that mode. Enough light to hike in the night and having the confidence of 100 hours of that is really cool. However for reading in bed at night and just keeping the light as low as possible I'd love a 3-5 lumen level as well.

Bottom line, I love the light and wouldn't mind getting another one but was curious if based on my personal likes and dislikes if anyone had any suggestions of something else to try.
 
Get the r2 edition of the t20. Still very bright and the best r2 thrower w a small nonaspheric head.
 
Get the r2 edition of the t20. Still very bright and the best r2 thrower w a small nonaspheric head.

+1
I have the T20C2 MkII and prefer it a little more over the T20C2 I had. But the second version with the revised UI of the original T20 might suit you well. Still plenty of good spill, but an incredible thrower for its size and the spot isn't very narrow IHMO(how did they do that?). Get one with the OP reflector if you decide on one.
 
A silly question, and I can't believe I'm asking it but do any other lights have that rubber tail cap cover like the MK II? Is that a generic piece that would work on any CR123 diameter sized tube?
Until I had it, I didn't realize how often I would hold my light with my teeth and how helpful that is in some situations. Yes I have headlamps, but no on me all the time :p
 
Maybe the Olight M20 Warrior R5?

Ive got the T20C2 Mk II aswell and i prefer the new Olight.
 
CM2010 - I was thinking about that light! Do you have them both? Does the M20 R5 outthrow the MK II? (It certainly advertises big #'s!)
 
Yes it does,not by a huge amount but it does the beam also seems to be alittle bit more cleaner to me if that makes any sense.
 
I've been traveling and haven't had a chance to order one. I was about to go ahead and get another eagletac and then something about the O light stood out to me last night. I was doing a long, night bicycle ride which I sometimes do and my light went out after about 1 1/2-2 hrs and left me in a harry situation. Most of it was my fault - I was climbing up a mountain that took 2 + hours to do and when I really needed high beam it was gone. If I had been smart, I would rode uphill on the 12 hour medium beam (plenty of light for my 8 mph uphill pace) and then would have had plenty of highbeam left for my highspeed downhill.

These are just manufacture specs but the Eagletac claims 380 emitter lumens on high for 1.7 hours and the O light claims 320 emitter lumens for 4 hours. I'm curious if O light is exageratting their run time, or if backing off that little bit makes it run 2X as long. I doubt I'd notice an output difference in the real world between 380 & 320 but that run time difference is HUGE (though I was already blown away and impressed with the eagletacs efficiency). That was all my bad - I should have had back up batteries... - I had a back up quark mini 123 strobbing and hanging from the bottom of my seat that went out too. I did go to a latenight grocery store that had a pack of 2 CR123's for $15.98 :sick2:

I also like the thought on the O light of a bit more focused of a beam.

The thing I can't get away from on the eagletac that I absolutely loved for an all around light was the rubber boot cap on the tail that helped it tail stand. I never realized before how convenient it is when using a flashlight to just be able to put in your mouth and hold it with your teeth :) I know that sounds crazy but I might not be able to buy an "all around" light without that :)
 
I think I'll try it as well but I'm gonna wait a few days or so and see if the "s" version is released... ANYONE KNOW WHERE TO GET A RUBBER TAIL CAP BOOT FOR A WARRIOR! :wave:
 
The run time numbers for the Eagletec are more in line with reality (more in line with the math).
 
Last edited:
I saw the words about the m30( same system m20s) and not good. So bought a m20 warrior. :paypal:;)


I think I'll try it as well but I'm gonna wait a few days or so and see if the "s" version is released... ANYONE KNOW WHERE TO GET A RUBBER TAIL CAP BOOT FOR A WARRIOR! :wave:
 
Top