<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Branley:
Proximity has been on average about 4-5 feet. I tried to hit them right between the eyes. In one case of the 4 cases I tried so far, the person knew what I was doing, in the other they were surprised.In 1 case there was overhead flourescent lighting, and in the other 3 there was your typical house lamp lighting. Not dark, but not bright in any case. I never got a blink of the eye, a movement of the head away, a raising of the hands, nothing that would indicate to me even a momentary distraction.
Comments were, "wow that's bright", and, "if I stared at that too long it might hurt."
Brian<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Brian,
I just tried that with a friend this evening around 10PM on a fairly well lit sidewalk in the large city where I live. I didn't feel comfortable using the light in a "surprise attack" so I told him exactly what I was going to do and got his permission. I told him to try not to close his eyes or turn away. I used a TACM III with a good lamp and fresh Surefires at a distance of five feet.
Results: his eyes closed uncontrollably but he kept his head still. I asked if that reaction was a genuine response to the brilliance of the light or a semi-conscious protective reaction. He said he wasn't sure. I repeated the action and told him that no permanent damage would occur with a very short exposure. He was determined to keep his eyes open at least for a second or two. Result: the same. This time he said it was definitely the brilliance of the light that was painful or disturbing enough that his eyes involuntarily closed.
Admittedly, I only had one test subject, and he may have had unusually sensitive eyes. Your test is actually more convincing because of the multiple subjects. OTOH, your subjects eyes were not as dark-adapted as mine. I must say that am very surprised that your "involuntary" subjects had literally no reaction. That is remarkable, unless you were a fair distance from them.
Unfortunately I didn't have my Scorpion with me for comparison, but as I later demonstrated to my friend, a properly functioning TACM III with a good lamp and fresh 123's will cast a surprisingly powerful beam. I aimed it at the top of a twelve story building across the street. The TACM illuminated the 12th Floor wall and window, not brightly but brilliantly. That is a throw of at least 120' and the window was lit up so brightly that a couple next to us exclaimed something like "Jeez, look at the spotlight" or words to that effect.
I think the Scorpion is a fine light, possibly the best buy of all the 2x123's, but it could't even begin to approach this kind of performance, as I have verified several times in the past.
The TACM's beam, aimed at a dark adapted subject from a distance of five feet on a reasonably well lit but still dark city street, has extraordinary power. I believe that if you try the experiment again staying within the above parameters, you might get a different result.
My EDC "mini superlight" is either the ASP Taclite/triad Model 1 (internal focus, carefully "stopped down" to minimum diameter) or thae TACM III. I am always careful to have fresh or barely used batteries (3.10-3.26v), clean contacts and relatively fresh lamps.
Please let me know if you redo the experiment.
Brightnorm