Hmmmmm. :thinking:LED Lights / Heads NOT compatible with 3.6 volt rechargeable batteries:
- All SureFire® Flashlights
Thanks for the feedback. A couple things...
I hadn't really thought of using a 17670 in a light that was not originally designed for it. That would be 3.6V instead of 6V. Wouldn't output be reduced noticably?
Also, near the bottom of Lighthound's Lithium Battery page (here: http://www.lighthound.com/index.asp?PageAction=Custom&ID=4), it states
Hmmmmm. :thinking:
Output is absolutely and noticeably lower when driving the P60L with 1x17670 versus primaries. A simple ceiling test will indicate as much. I would gather that the higher constant voltage of 2xRCR123 after the initial sag would be of detriment to the overall lifespan of the bulb.
Oops, my mistake, sorry! I was just going on what others said. (e.g. here SCblur didn't notice a difference) Mine ought to be here in a few days.
But I'm think that the 2xR123 would be ok; in any case the 'bulb' or more correctly the LED is protected by regulation circuitry. So we are talking about potential harm to the regulator. I saw that with 2 primaries, the draw of the P60L is 390mA and with 3 cells, it draws 260mA. In any case quite a few people use this setup. I don't have measurements but I think that at that level of draw the primaries in a 3 cell setup would sag less than rechargeables in a 2 cell?