Crelant 7G1 (1xAA, XP-G R5) Review: RUNTIMES, BEAMSHOTS, and more!

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
Warning: pic heavy, as usual. :whistle:

7G1011.jpg


Specifications:
  • LED: CREE XP-G R5
  • Function: High - Low - Strobe
  • 1 x AA Battery:
  • High output: 138 Lumen for 108 minutes
  • Low output: 60 Lumen for 3 hours
  • Strobe: 10 Lumen for 36 hours
  • 1 x 14500 Li-ion Battery
  • High output: 228 Lumen for 90 minutes
  • 2. Low output: 80 Lumen for 3 hours
  • 3. Strobe: 10 Lumen for 24 hours
  • Reflector: High efficient smooth reflector with aluminum bezel.
  • Size: Length 100mm, Body Diameter 21mm
  • Type-III hard anodize high quality aerospace grade T6061 aluminium construction
  • Water proof: waterproof to 5m/15ft
  • Tactical type switch: High/Low/Strobe/Off
  • Weight: 50 g / less than 2 ounces excluding the battery.
  • Included in the box: Lanyard, Tail Cap Button, Spare O-Rings
  • Estimated MSRP ~$69
Crelant is a new maker on the scene, and the 7G1 is their first model (1xAA, NiMH/Alkaline/L91 and 14500).

7G1010.jpg

7G1009.jpg


Packaging is fairly basic, clearly designed for a store shelf. Inside the cardboard box with plastic insert is the light, manual, spare o-rings, and extra boot cap.

7G1008.jpg

7G1005.jpg

From left to right: Duracell AA, Crelant 7G1, Fenix LD10-R4, 4Sevens Quark AA, Zebralight SC51, Nitecore D10SP

7G1: Weight: 47.5 g (no batteries), Length 100.8mm x Width 21.1mm (bezel)

7G1012.jpg

7G1018.jpg

7G1017.jpg


Build quality seems high, with a lot of nice touches (e.g. the stainless steel bezel ring).

Light feels reasonably solid for this class. There are a lot of body details to help with grip, including fairly good knurling and a lot of ridge detail

Screw threads are anodized at the tailcap for lock-out. :)

Anodizing is excellent on my sample, no chips in the dark gray natural finish (HA = type III). Lettering is sharp and clear, but not overly bright (which is good, because there are a lot of labels on the head).

Switch is a reverse clicky, which is a bit of a surprise. The light tailstands, but just barely - my sample is rather wobbly. I understand this is supposed to be improved on later builds. If you find it an issue, a bit of adjusting of the tailcap switch may help.

The is no clip or wrist strap included with the light.

7G1014.jpg

7G1002.jpg


The 7G1features the Cree XP-G R5, with a lightly textured (LOP) deep reflector.

Which brings us to the requisite white wall hunting ;). All lights are on Hi on Sanyo Eneloop, about ~0.75 meter from a white wall (with the camera ~1.25 meters back from the wall). Automatic white balance on the camera, to minimize tint differences.

7G1-Beam001.jpg
LD10R4-Beam001.jpg

7G1-Beam001.jpg
MiniAA-Beam001.jpg


7G1-Beam002.jpg
LD10R4-Beam002.jpg

7G1-Beam002.jpg
MiniAA-Beam002.jpg


7G1-Beam003.jpg
LD10R4-Beam003.jpg

7G1-Beam003.jpg
MiniAA-Beam003.jpg


7G1-Beam004.jpg
LD10R4-Beam004.jpg

7G1-Beam004.jpg
MiniAA-Beam004.jpg


From now on, all my beamshots will be taken in this standard configuration, to facilitate comparisons.

As you can see, the 7G1 has a nice and smooth beam. It may not be as high on Max as some of the more recent heavily-driven lights, but is still quite reasonable for this class. Scroll down to my Summary Tables for more specifics.

User Interface

Turn the light on by pressing the tailcap clicky (press for momentary on, click for locked on).

With the head fully tightened, you get Max output.

Loosen the head a quarter turn or more, and you get all the other modes. The default setting is Strobe, and you advance through the various modes by a soft-press of the clicky. Sequence is Strobe > Lo > Med > Hi, in repeating sequence. There is a memory mode, so the light will recall your preference for the head-loosened mode.

Pretty straight-forward. :)

PWM and Strobe

7G1-MedPWM.gif

7G1-LoPWM.gif


The 7G1 uses PWM on its Med and Lo mode, at the visually-undetectable frequencies of 4.86 kHz and 4.95 kHz, respectively.

7G1-Strobe.gif


Strobe is 10 Hz.

Testing Method:

All my output numbers are relative for my home-made light box setup, a la Quickbeam's flashlightreviews.com method. You can directly compare all my relative output values from different reviews - i.e. an output value of "10" in one graph is the same as "10" in another. All runtimes are done under a cooling fan, except for any extended run Lo/Min modes (i.e. >12 hours) which are done without cooling.

I have recently devised a method for converting my lightbox relative output values (ROV) to estimated Lumens. See my How to convert Selfbuilt's Lighbox values to Lumens thread for more info.

Throw/Output Summary Chart:

Effective November 2010, I have revised my summary tables to match with the current ANSI FL-1 standard for flashlight testing. Please see http://www.sliderule.ca/FL1.htm for a description of the terms used in these tables.

1AA-FL1-Summary1.gif


1AA-FL1-Summary2.gif


On standard batteries, the 7G1 has reasonably good output and throw – although not as high as some of the recent heavily-driven 1xAA lights. However, the 7G1 fully supports 14500, where output is considerably higher.

Output/Runtime Comparison:

7G1-HiL91.gif


7G1-HiEne.gif

7G1-MedEne.gif


7G1-HiAlka.gif

7G1-MedAlka.gif

7G1-LoAlka.gif


7G1-Hi14500.gif

7G1-Med14500.gif


Output/runtime performance is good overall.

On standard alkalines, it nearly matches the current-controlled Fenix LD10-R4. :eek:oo: On NiMH (Eneloop), performance is ok - not as impressive as the alkaline performance, but still good for a PWM-based light.

On 14500, performance is very good for this class.

Potential Issues

Tailstanding ability is borderline on my sample, despite the use of a reverse clicky. However, this may have been resolved on later builds.

Max output is lower than some of the recent XP-G R4/R5-equipped lights.

Light lacks a "moonlight" mode.

Bundled extras are fairly limited.

Preliminary Observations

The 7G1 is a quality light. As always, design is a matter of personal taste, and the 7G1 has one of the most "rakish" looks out there. But it has excellent grip, and a lot of nice design touches.

Performance-wise, overall circuit efficiency on NiMH or L91 seems reasonable for a PWM-based light (especially one with such a high frequency :thumbsup:). But the light seems to be optimized for standard alkaline cells, where it performs close to the level of a good current-controlled light. :eek:oo: Performance on 14500 (which are officially supported) also seems very good.

One issue for some may be the Max output - it is not as heavily-driven as some of the other recent XP-G R4/R5 AA-sized lights. To give you an idea, max output on the 7G1 is closer to the Fenix Hi mode (which is a bit lower than the Zebralight SC51 secondary Hi mode). But it's still plenty of light for the job, and ensures a reasonable runtime.

Personally, I'm glad to see the return of high frequency PWM. There has been a trend lately to downgrade to visible PWM in order to boost efficiency. For the visibly-undetectable PWM used here, performance is still quite good (remarkably so on alkalines).

One thing I would definitely like to see is a lower Lo mode. After all, that is one of the advantages of a PWM-based light - the ability to run at lower outputs than the current-controlled circuits. And a few extra bundled accessories would be nice (i.e. a clip and holster). But it is a nicely built light as it stands. I'm looking forward to seeing what they come up with next.

----

7G1 provided by Crelant for review.
 
Last edited:

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
Written by RSnatch on 11-30-2010 07:42 PM GMT

Thanks selfbuilt for yet another thorough review. I hope they did end up resolving the slight tailstand issue with the later models.
Written by T45 on 12-01-2010 09:34 PM GMT

Excellent review Selfbuilt! I had seen the ads for Crelant and wondered about their build quality. I have a preference for 1AA lights and this looks like a contender for ownership except for the aspect of no momentary on Forward clicky.
Written by TomH on 12-02-2010 07:21 AM GMT

I wonder why most all of the Chinese makers of this style light insist on using reverse clickys.

Are forward clicky switches that much more expensive to make? I wouldn't think so, but who knows.

Clean up the design a bit, and change the type of switch, Crelant would have a winner.
Written by selfbuilt on 12-02-2010 07:56 AM GMT

T45 said:
I have a preference for 1AA lights and this looks like a contender for ownership except for the aspect of no momentary on Forward clicky.
TomH said:
I wonder why most all of the Chinese makers of this style light insist on using reverse clickys.

Are forward clicky switches that much more expensive to make? I wouldn't think so, but who knows.
There are a couple of reasons to prefer a reverse clicky - they are more reliable that forward clickies, and they have a lower profile (thus facilitating tailstanding). But they do lack momentary on, which seems to be highly prized by flashaholics (I don't imagine the general public cares so much). There are a couple of reasons to prefer a reverse clicky - they are more reliable that forward clickies, and they have a lower profile (thus facilitating tailstanding). But they do lack momentary on, which seems to be highly prized by flashaholics (I don't imagine the general public cares so much).

FYI, Crelant has announced the use of forward clickies on their new 7G2 model. Don't know if they plan to retrofit the 7G1, or change it in the future.
Written by phantom23 on 12-02-2010 12:43 PM GMT

selfbuilt said:
There are a couple of reasons to prefer a reverse clicky - they are more reliable that forward clickies, and they have a lower profile (thus facilitating tailstanding). But they do lack momentary on, which seems to be highly prized by flashaholics (I don't imagine the general public cares so much).
+ forward with clicky modes is a nightmare. + forward with clicky modes is a nightmare.
 

selfbuilt

Flashaholic
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
6,936
Location
Canada
The main review post has been updated with the final review text.

The thread discussions have been fully restored from the search engine cache data (thank you tandem!).

Please carry on! :)
 

Latest posts

Top