As with any such "News", especially from Fox it can be hard to find the truth.
More accurately, starting with Fox you will find out about issues that are otherwise being hidden or not covered.
A number of reliable polls have established that mainstream news (ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN/PBS/MTV/BBC/most newspapers/Time/Newsweek/etc.) staff are self-avowed liberals, and don't see their own liberal bias in their presentations. This conflicts with the fact that only 20-25% of Americans consider themselves to be a liberal.
You would never have found the source of the August/September public "tea" protests, or understand the depth and intensity of their feelings without Fox News. You would have been totally surprised to hear the correlating oppositional poll numbers to the health care insurance debate.
If you actually read what the new section replaces you find that the replacement does a couple things.
1. It *LIMITS* what can be done and explains under what conditions it can happen.
The old section allowed the governer to do anything he or she thought was needed.
Interesting to note the changes occurred after the news clip gsxrac listed above was aired on Fox. Coincidence? Was it previously publicized in the mainstream?
I wish fewer people did watch Fox "News" or at least compare it with what the rest of the world says.
Oh so there is a spurious Fox News presentation, and then the "truth" of what the rest of the world says? You do realize the difference between the hard news segments on Fox, and the opinionated commentary shows (Beck, Hannity, mostly O'Reilly), right?
I wonder where the undercover videos were presented that exposed Acorn, leading to abrupt massive governmental abandonment?
Please don't assume because some of us watch some portions of Fox News that we are gulping it down mindlessly. While there were plenty of news outlets constantly going after the smallest details of the previous administration, don't you think it is crucial to always have an aggressive and adversarial watchdog relationship from the Constitutionally protected Press?
It is even more important when you have any one group with the majority of power. With rare, filibuster-proof Senatorial control, critical outlets like Fox should be praised, not pilloried. It is the final, last line of defense of a free people. I am not saying that Fox News is perfect. I agree that it leans right slightly with hard news segments, and overtly with opinion shows. There is a segment of the population that it is representing, reflected in its ratings. Giving voices to diverse groups in a representational democracy is the foundation of freedom.