Through the kind courtesy of 4sevens I have this Limited Edition Fenix LD01 stainless steel to try out.
This stainless steel version should be functionally similar to the regular LD01 version - it's just made out of stainless steel -
Size -
it's only just slightly longer than the older L0D - but feels a lot heavier - it weighs in at 1.67oz (47.4g) with battery - compare this to the aluminum L0D 0.95oz (27.0g) - So the LD01 ss is 0.72oz (20.4g) heavier - doesn't sound much but it is some 76% heavier. The AA sized Fenix L1D weighs about the same without battery at 1.65oz (46.8g).
Anyway it's not a big deal but the weight gain is quite noticable.
Head -
the LD01 uses a Cree Q5 - so it's an upgrade from the Q4 used in the last L0D
It came in very attractive packaging -
Nice looking "desirable" stainless steel - but all this would be not much unless it performs -
vs. Fenix L0D-RB80 both on High/Max NiMH (eneloop)
yes, the LD01 definitely is brighter than the older RB80 L0D.
Tints are reasonable it's cool for a Rebel -
but slightly "warm" for a Cree.......
the LD01 still betrays a faint dark halo -
but hardly worth writing about.
So the LD01 is brighter - comparing Medium with -
vs. Fenix L0D-RB80 high BUT with LD01ss on Medium -
now the Fenix L0D-RB80 on High shows brighter than the LD01 on Medium....
vs. Fenix LD10 Turbo/Max both NiMH
not surprisingly the LD10 is brighter since it is rated at 120 lumens - one can see this sample of the "LD10" is quite a bit "warmer" than the LD01.
vs. Fenix LD10 Medium -
The "LD10" on Medium is not as bright as the LD01 High......
again no surprise.
How about the LD01 on Low?
Low vs. classic Arc-AAA (circa ~2003) NiMH
the LD01 low is noticably brighter than the classic 2003 Arc-AAA.
Low vs. Fenix E01 NiMH
LD01 Low is noticably brighter than the Fenix E01 too.....
I would have liked a lower low on the LD01 - but that's just quibbling - this Stainless Steel Fenix LD01 is a very desirable little flashlight.
(not that I use them - but I kind of miss those strobe and SOS modes - but I do understand that many feel the opposite)
This stainless steel version should be functionally similar to the regular LD01 version - it's just made out of stainless steel -
Size -
it's only just slightly longer than the older L0D - but feels a lot heavier - it weighs in at 1.67oz (47.4g) with battery - compare this to the aluminum L0D 0.95oz (27.0g) - So the LD01 ss is 0.72oz (20.4g) heavier - doesn't sound much but it is some 76% heavier. The AA sized Fenix L1D weighs about the same without battery at 1.65oz (46.8g).
Anyway it's not a big deal but the weight gain is quite noticable.
Head -
the LD01 uses a Cree Q5 - so it's an upgrade from the Q4 used in the last L0D
It came in very attractive packaging -
Nice looking "desirable" stainless steel - but all this would be not much unless it performs -
vs. Fenix L0D-RB80 both on High/Max NiMH (eneloop)
yes, the LD01 definitely is brighter than the older RB80 L0D.
Tints are reasonable it's cool for a Rebel -
but slightly "warm" for a Cree.......
the LD01 still betrays a faint dark halo -
but hardly worth writing about.
So the LD01 is brighter - comparing Medium with -
vs. Fenix L0D-RB80 high BUT with LD01ss on Medium -
now the Fenix L0D-RB80 on High shows brighter than the LD01 on Medium....
vs. Fenix LD10 Turbo/Max both NiMH
not surprisingly the LD10 is brighter since it is rated at 120 lumens - one can see this sample of the "LD10" is quite a bit "warmer" than the LD01.
vs. Fenix LD10 Medium -
The "LD10" on Medium is not as bright as the LD01 High......
again no surprise.
How about the LD01 on Low?
Low vs. classic Arc-AAA (circa ~2003) NiMH
the LD01 low is noticably brighter than the classic 2003 Arc-AAA.
Low vs. Fenix E01 NiMH
LD01 Low is noticably brighter than the Fenix E01 too.....
I would have liked a lower low on the LD01 - but that's just quibbling - this Stainless Steel Fenix LD01 is a very desirable little flashlight.
(not that I use them - but I kind of miss those strobe and SOS modes - but I do understand that many feel the opposite)
Last edited:
