Until I get the call from Henry, or he emails his findings, the only difference I can see for these first 4 are that it will
"go to 11". It's one of the reasons there are so few of the first ones. If there is a chance the CRI would be higher, or the tint may look different... just don't know so have to build em to find out.
It's an experiment, like mixing Liquid Plumber and tinfoil those many many many years ago back in Jr. High School. Don't leave it in a glass soda bottle with the cap on. I still remember my dad's face when he saw what the explosion did to the bathroom. Yep. Kinda like that without the explosion or a month of being grounded. Ahhhh. To be 37 years younger.
Henry didn't think they could be driven higher than the 200, though they should be about 10% more efficient. Won't know the exact CRI and other details until he finishes them on the sphere. I'm hoping for a surprise, but not counting on it with those 4. Still, better efficiency is still a good thing, and if it does turn out they can be brought up to 250 lumens, then, so be it. Again, won't know until later tonight. Henry's a night owl, so...
The 5000k is what I'm very curious to see... not just the beam but the data.
They could probably be driven at 225, but the way lights are calibrated, it would mean having to do a total reprogramming of the calibrator. The current calibrator does 200, 250, 325... so going in to change that doesn't make sense. If the light can't make 250, it is then set at 200.
If you get bored waiting, you can always read this thread, it will let you know just how crazy I am, just in case you didn't already know this:
The Adventures of Longman and Shorty
Update: So I got an email from Henry late last night. He said the lights are built, calibrated, and "look nice". However, he cannot boot into Windows 7 to run the integrating sphere - it has been several months since he last did that. I'll see if I can run over there today to help swear at the computer.