IWC question

harrydog

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jun 13, 2002
Messages
31
I'm not a watch aficionado by any means, so please excuse these very basic questions.
What is it that makes the IWC Aquatimer (which I'm interested in purchasing) cost twice as much as an Omega Seamaster? Is the movement that much better? Also, how does it compare to a Rolex Submariner which costs about the same?
Thanks
 
Oh no, it's not fair to put Omega in that category as a Mag. Many consider them to be equal or superior in quality to a Rolex at half the price. There was a time when Rolex's were (relatively) fairly priced. Then in the early 80s, they started becoming the yuppie's watch of choice. All of a sudden although the watch models changed very little if at all, Rolex prices began skyrocketing and have stayed that way since.
 
IWC is a very fine watch. The movements on them have much more attention to detail in the assembly and engraving. IWC and leCoultre are sister companies and the movement components (eubach) are much less "mass produced" than an Omega. Omega is owned by the Swatch Group (formerly SMH)and is the largest watch company in the world. The folks who own Omega also own all of the companies that make the components so they have a bit of an inside edge. IWC is a much more hand assembled item than an Omega, hence the price difference
 
As a long time TZer I must disagree.
Both IWC and Omega are on par with Arc or Elektrolumens.
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif
 
IWC has a much more tightly-controlled distribution than Omega, making IWC's slightly more exclusive. Just call around to jewelry and watch shops and see how many are authorized Omega dealers vs. IWC dealers--the ratio is probably somewhere around a low of 7:1, to possibly 10:1.

In the luxury watch pyramid (with Patek Philippe at the top), I'd personally rank IWC very near the top (with the likes of JLC, Audemars Piguet, Franck Muller, etc.). I would put Omega in the mid-to-upper range (with Breitling, Ebel, Raymond Weil, Cartier, Chopard, Corum, etc.). IMO, Rolex would straddle the area between the two. Of course, each manufacture has a range of models up and down the spectrum, so ranking them is an imprecise science--averaging out the entire line.

This is my personal opinion, having handled and inspected a great many of many of these watch models, knowing their lines, and having spoken to many of the manufacturer's representatives. I'm positive there will be those who disagree with me, and that's fine.

Before buying an IWC, one should be aware that IWC's are serviced only by IWC in New York. You will not find parts or anyone else to service them, because IWC does not distribute those parts to anyone. A full overhaul should be performed about every 5 years, and will run about $500 for a mid-range IWC model (MSRP $3000-6000).

The IWC Aquatimer is one awesome watch. It is in use by a number of German combat-swimmer types, and is not just a showy luxury diver's watch. I do not personally own one, but a close cousin just acquired one as a wedding gift from his bride, and it was a beauty.

Bottom line, you will not be disappointed in either an IWC Aquatimer or Omega SMP. But, the reality is that there are simply many more (probably tens of thousands) of SMP's produced each year, while Aquatimer production is probably a fraction of that.

HTH
 
IMHO, as an owner of the 3 first mentioned (Omega, IWC, and Rolex) the Rolex Submariner can't be beat as the best all around choice for a rugged, "waterproof" watch. I've had mine for years, and it has outlasted and outperformed any other watch I've ever worn on land or in the water. Easy to read, accurate, easy to get serviced, holds its value better than any brand except Patek.

Best general advice I've ever gotten on water resistant watches, if it doesn't screw down and have gaskets/o-rings, don't take it in the water. And BTW, I am a diver.
 
Thanks for the replies. I've been researching as much as I can lately and I'm learning more all the time.
I really like the IWC Aquatimer and I like the fact that it would go unnoticed by the vast majority of people. Only those in the know would recognize and appreciate it. I like that. And that's what I really don't like about Rolex. Most non-watch people think there is nothing better than a Rolex. Even the checkout clerk at K-Mart and the kid flipping burgers at McDonalds will drool over it it and that's a turn off to me. Rolex is too much of an attention getter. And based on what I've been reading, their movements, while made in-house, are no better than the modified ETA or Lemania movements used by Omega and others. Not to say that Rolex isn't an excellent watch, of course it is. But at that price point it's not the watch for me.
As to the IWC, the issue of service (they recommend every 3 years) and the lack of dealers (there are none even remotely close to me) has made me think twice about the wisdom of that choice. Maybe someday.
Which brings me to Omega. I think they're impossible to beat for the money. Every bit as good as a Rolex in all practical aspects, though not in prestige, but I care not about that.
So, I think at this point I'm tackling the issue of which Omega to buy.
 
I've had my Sea Dweller (Rolex)for 25 years.
Been too 100ft more than a dozen times and years of sailing,
It has a... Patina.
Been serviced once and is a tank.Keeps excellent time.
I bought my first Rolex when they were $300, about 1974 and that was a stainless Daytona.
Then we got Yuppies
They discovered BMW's too
Want a great watch for a very fair price?
Take a look at Sinn!!!!
I wear my 356 instead of the Rolex.
Mrdi
 
Back
Top